That’s too simplistic for ScottWCE have tall KF's. We will need Blic in defence, rain or not. Also 2 rucks. Stanley will be fresh and motivated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s too simplistic for ScottWCE have tall KF's. We will need Blic in defence, rain or not. Also 2 rucks. Stanley will be fresh and motivated.
The fence to fence is 173.5m long I think.I took mine off the Optus Oval fact sheet - I'm blaming them if it's wrong
Unless the 171m by 146m is the dimensions to the fence, and the dimensions on the fact sheet is referring to the in bounds playing area - does that make sense?
AFL Fact Sheet
The multi-purpose Optus Stadium is a world-class venue capable of hosting a range of events, including Australian Football League (AFL) matches.optusstadium.com.au
We had 4 AA's and a few others who were close. Average list, indeed.Not how i see it.
They get us to overachieve with a very average list, apart from the recognised superstars.
No issue with our top end talent, have said that several times; just our bottom 6-8 are not up to the standard of the good top 6 teams. Your issue with Scott fails when we actually do win finals, like v Hawthorn, Swans.We had 4 AA's and a few others who were close. Average list, indeed.
I disagree. The facts support Scott as a home and away specialist coach who does not have the coaching acumen to get his team to play finals level football. He cannot develop a coaching plan to take on finals pressure.
An average coach is Scott. A corporate coach who plays the media well and knows how to massage the board. He is the opposite of a Clarkson or Thompson. More like a Ross Lyon.
Hawthorn and Swans were easy targets. Like the Bulldogs to WCE today. A win is a win, I suppose.No issue with our top end talent, have said that several times; just our bottom 6-8 are not up to the standard of the good top 6 teams. Your issue with Scott fails when we actually do win finals, like v Hawthorn, Swans.
I said it would happen on Thursday, and if it had been pouring, wet , windy, stormy as predicted, it might have made sense.Hawthorn and Swans were easy targets. Like the Bulldogs to WCE today. A win is a win, I suppose.
I would rate our top 12 against any team. If the coach can't get 6-8 good ordinary players to play a role week in week out, then he is not much of a coach. The bottom six aren't supposed to carry the team, you know.
I watched the first quarter again today (masochist, I know). The game plan is definite. Hold the ball up, go around the boundary line, slowly does it. Control the tempo. Don't take risks. You can do this against weaker teams like Carlton and North. But a decent side will break out and slap you down. Like what happened.
Scott is murdering our big marking forwards. He killed our midfield leaving out Stanley. I'm interested to hear you defend him leaving out a ruckman.
Tigers/ west coast v woods granny. Woods soft side of draw. Cats butchered it!
The issue here isn’t that they aren’t going to change the game plan after last night.
The issue is we have now had 3 years and going into a 4th of this not working, you can’t rip up a game plan now but it should have been changed 6 months ago.
I hope I am proven wrong and the next 3 weeks are the best 3 weeks we will experience since 2011, but how many more times do we serve up last nights quarter 1 before we realize it needs to change?
I am not in the sack Scott club, he proved earlier this year he can change things with more attacking football, and I don’t think there is much more out there.
But what changes, if we don’t win the next three what does Chris Scott do to stop the same movie playing over and over again?
Star Wars episode 1: 16PF
Episode 2: 17QF
Episode 3: 17PF
Episode 4: 18EF
Episode 5: 19QF
I don’t need to see this movie again.
Tigers/ west coast v woods granny. Woods soft side of draw. Cats butchered it!
Collingwood have so many injuries
If Moore goes down (high possibility) they're stuffed.
Another soft flag to Richmond awaits.
It reminded me of the Hawthorn game last year - Blicavs started the game in the middle of the ground, sometimes on Mitchell and other times in the ruck. Once the ruck contest was over he would then work hard to get back into defence to take Roughead - and we all remember what happened to young Zac Guthrie late in the match
Wish we wouldn't get too smart with Blicavs and just leave him in one role - unless we need to switch things up during the match such as the Adelaide game
gamble was another parsons.We've been pretty good over that time, without finals success, better than the majority of teams in our predicament. Gamble was worthwhile from my pov. Tuohy and Hendo have dropped off and Stanley will always be Stanley.
WCE have tall KF's. We will need Blic in defence, rain or not. Also 2 rucks. Stanley will be fresh and motivated.
So can someone explain something to me... How is this game plan supposed to work. Like... if executed properly, what's supposed to happen?
I can't for the life of me work out how continually taking clean possession, holding it up and then turning that into a 50/50 down the line is meant to achieve anything at all?
And why do we literally never switch? How can it ever be statistically better to get stuck on the same wing all night than to try to find a way to break the lines?
Genuine questions. I realise this morning that I straight up don't see how our game plan is even meant to work if executed perfectly.
C,mon CATS whip wce. Remember rely on the CATS instincts. If it breaths we can kill it.
C,mon CATS whip wce. Remember rely on the CATS instincts. If it breaths we can kill it.
I heard Glen Jackovich on the radio this afternoon - and he said ( not in a nasty way ) that after last night that both Joel Selwood and Gary Ablett are finished and done - he actually said it twice
And he ought to know - because as good as he was - he had to pull the pin half way through a season - said the end can come very quick
The few commentators i have listened to re the game - theve all said the same thing - Geelong look horribly slow - thats the constant
We're not breathing.
Not sure if you're completely taking the piss or not. I mean your own club said a variation of those words a long time ago.
That's nice and all, but i wouldn't waste your breath on that one. Scott won't learn a thing from the loss to Collingwood, why should he, he hasn't learned from all the teams in the last eight weeks that beat us using those same tactics. I bet the WCE will learn something though, and that's what you need to do to stop the Cats. But Chris Scott, no he doesn't learn, doesn't change, just keeps hoping for the best. He's happy with mediocrity. hey, the cats were minor premiers, Chris Scott thinks that's just great. Well done everyone.No not taking the piss i have a soft spot for CATS . I really want you guys to win. The clubs i hate are WCE ,and really hate collingwood and richmond , Carlton.And yes i will be yelling my guts out for you guys to win.i will watch it.