Burton89onegoal
Team Captain
- Jan 1, 2019
- 468
- 1,072
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
His Granny's name is duurs, and she's lovelyWtf is a granny duurs is lovely
That username doesn't make a lick of sense
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
His Granny's name is duurs, and she's lovelyWtf is a granny duurs is lovely
That username doesn't make a lick of sense
I find this argument that we should keep Hinkley but just surround him with more competent assistants quite bizarre. Assistant coaches should compliment the head coach not cover for their inadequacies.While Ken definitely has his flaws and there are better head coaches out there, I think he can potentially be managed by the right assistants ....
It is quite bizarre isn't it. The CEO of a company would not just be given a better executive assistant and advisors if he or she was s**t at their job. So why do we insist on paying large sums of money and publicly backing in the guy who has 7 years to stand for something but has shown that he is only as good or bad as those around him. That is not a leader that is a chameleon.I find this argument that we should keep Hinkley but just surround him with more competent assistants quite bizarre. Assistant coaches should compliment the head coach not cover for their inadequacies.
The problem with this approach at Ports, other than the fact that it only treats the symptoms and not the root cause, is that Hinkley has the final say and is stubborn and clueless.
As I've suggested previously, the better solution would be to get rid of Hinkley altogether and replace him with one of these "assistants".
Yep so would I but Hinkley is here to stay.I’d prefer we identify our next coach now, for 2020, and give him time to build the team of assistants he wants.
Building coaching teams takes time
I find this argument that we should keep Hinkley but just surround him with more competent assistants quite bizarre. Assistant coaches should compliment the head coach not cover for their inadequacies.
The problem with this approach at Ports, other than the fact that it only treats the symptoms and not the root cause, is that Hinkley has the final say and is stubborn and clueless.
As I've suggested previously, the better solution would be to get rid of Hinkley altogether and replace him with one of these "assistants".
I find this argument that we should keep Hinkley but just surround him with more competent assistants quite bizarre. Assistant coaches should compliment the head coach not cover for their inadequacies.
The problem with this approach at Ports, other than the fact that it only treats the symptoms and not the root cause, is that Hinkley has the final say and is stubborn and clueless.
As I've suggested previously, the better solution would be to get rid of Hinkley altogether and replace him with one of these "assistants".
So that's why Hinkley still has a job?Someone who is wrong 99% of the time should still be listened to so that you can decipher the 99 wrong from the 1 right.
Especially when everyone says he doesn't listen to his assistants anyway.
It's grossWtf is a granny duurs is lovely
That username doesn't make a lick of sense
Wtf is a granny duurs is lovely
That username doesn't make a lick of sense
*slips out the back door *I ask the same thing about yourself Mr. Sob Rave!
It's gross
I ask the same thing about yourself Mr. Sob Rave!
I'm sure she isn't but it's an unfortunate combination of words that conjures up a heavy breathing Granny stalker.Duursmas granny isn't gross, she's a really nice woman. Used to be a Collingwood supporter, but she's seen the light.