I had a print out once upon a time all kinds of seedinessAre you thinking of Wakefield?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I had a print out once upon a time all kinds of seedinessAre you thinking of Wakefield?
I had a print out once upon a time all kinds of seediness
Are you going to the SANFL GF?
I am, haven't given much of a s**t all year though.
I'll answer the last point....BECAUSE BY BEING 'FOOTBALLING WOMEN' THEY ARE LITERALLY A SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP! Their rights and opportunities to play are only now being addressed. It is totally as much about womens (and other group such as LGBTI+, how often have the women footballers of the past been dismissed as a 'bunch of dykes') rights and acceptance in the game as it is about football!
It ain't going away. When I started the side I coach we had 4 girls who could barely kick a ball. Now the first team squad contains 40 and there are more and more juniors coming through. If you want to know how much this all means to their perception of themselves and their opportunities, I suggest you volunteer for a junior girls team, you'll soon see the right of it.
I mean she clearly is - she’s got one. QED.huh? She can be a kids hero but she's not a champion worthy of a statue.
Yes very important, mmm. That standard that doesn’t exist must be enforced.I'm talking about the standard for immortalising people in statues around the place..
Janus joined 2007.. would of been funny if janus had joined a day or two after he became coach of port.I am now certain you are Ken - "we have a long way to go to be anything like the Richmond Football Club"
To be fair, everyone was dodgy back then.
I'm not saying it should go away, I'm saying it's not what it's sold as. That's great you have a girls team, I've been around sports that involved women for a long time, one of the most insulting things is for people to pretend womens sports somehow didn't seemingly exist before they had football teams which is what you've done here. I have no issue with them playing but you wouldn't make a statue out the side of the ground of one of your players after 22 non descript games right?
The entire argument is so flimsy I’m surprised you’re humoring the idea that it might be anything other than the reflex of ingrained misogynyWhy can't you understand that the statue isn't only of the player, it is of the moment and the reaction to it? The whole reason why the AFLW is bigger than the people on the Oval.
AgreeI mean she clearly is - she’s got one. QED.
Yes very important, mmm. That standard that doesn’t exist must be enforced.
I’ve mentioned this a few times previously, but since the Suns went up there and got out and about in the community, Queensland’s participation levels have overtaken South Australia’s.
Like the Swans, this is a 30-50+ year project to unlock the northern market and win hearts and minds, which is all the more crucial given how wobbly Rugby Union is at the moment.
Chuck in the multimedia potential of Queensland and the AFL will continue to wear financial losses and poor onfield performance for a long time to come.
I mean she clearly is - she’s got one. QED.
Yes very important, mmm. That standard that doesn’t exist must be enforced.
Alice in Wonderland is ******* awesome. To even use Alice as an example is straight up jabberwocky.Agree
There's a statue of Alice in wonderland in the parklands and she's only a figment of the fevered yearnings of a sexually repressed middle aged academic/cleric.
Societies have always made statues of whatever they want to. If it's important to someone and they've got the money to stump up for it they'll put one up.
No I haven't I have been a girls soccer coach for years.
The opportunity to play football hasn't really existed, that's a simple fact.
Why can't you understand that the statue isn't only of the player, it is of the moment and the reaction to it? The whole reason why the AFLW is bigger than the people on the Oval.
Agree AiW is great but my point is simply people put up statues because of what inspires them rather than following some existing qualification criteriaAlice in Wonderland is ******* awesome. To even use Alice as an example is straight up jabberwocky.
Having a statue made of you passes the non existent threshold of whether you can have a statue made of youNot sure your sponsor making you one counts as being selected as a champion.
Its really not. Companies commission art all the time.It's a unique marketing move though.
They might think it was coolSo if we stuck a statue up of a womens soccer player from the initial few years who'd played 22 games, how many of the girls you coached would be like wow that was worthy? None.
They might think it was cool
You may not realise this but most people don’t look at art and judge it ‘worthy’ or not
Having a statue made of you passes the non existent threshold of whether you can have a statue made of you
Its really not. Companies commission art all the time.
There was a whole thing about Brave Girl standing in front of the bull in Wall Street, and that was a corporate commission.How many public bronze statues of people have you seen from companies lately?
How many followers of AFLW do you reckon don’t know who Tayla Harris is. How about of people who just follow AFL.Of relative nobodies at that?
NAB sponsors the league. Same as they pay kids to dress up as AFL footballers for their ads (are we judging player worthiness for that?) Its marketing.I can't think of one? Maybe an iconic animal or something but not of a person a company sponsors so I think it's pretty unique.
There's a statue of Boof Lehman at Adelaide Oval. Fruchoctopian hero but a relative nobody in the history of international cricketHow many public bronze statues of people have you seen from companies lately? Of relative nobodies at that? I can't think of one? Maybe an iconic animal or something but not of a person a company sponsors so I think it's pretty unique.
Agree
There's a statue of Alice in wonderland in the parklands and she's only a figment of the fevered yearnings of a sexually repressed middle aged academic/cleric.
Societies have always made statues of whatever they want to. If it's important to someone and they've got the money to stump up for it they'll put one up.