- Thread starter
- #651
..............
Classic Seppos
They did the same thing to Carl Lewis so he couldn't look like Ben Johnson
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
..............
Maybe I should have looked at the form closer.. MJ only a 3 week break. shes a moral. #imadumbarse
ugh typo. 4Honestly mate I would go and see a doctor
ugh typo. 4
there are statistics that show that horses win more in a certain time frame from when the date they raced before. Thats fact and has held up for decades. You ignore those facts and you will lose in the long run.So at 4 she's a moral but 5 she'd be too unfit - seems about as legit a theory as the 10k Cup rule discussion
there are statistics that show that horses win more in a certain time frame from when the date they raced before. Thats fact and has held up for decades. You ignore those facts and you will lose in the long run.
this is Australia. Could not give a rats rear end about European racing, its actually rubbish racing except for the big meetings and jumping.What if she raced next Wednesday would that be ok? Or do horses drop off a cliff if they haven't raced within 28 days?
I think you need to watch some European racing to see how made up this myth is.
this is Australia. Could not give a rats rear end about European racing, its actually rubbish racing except for the big meetings and jumping.
Anyway keep doing what your doing. i am sure it works for you....
this is Australia. Could not give a rats rear end about European racing, its actually rubbish racing except for the big meetings and jumping.
Anyway keep doing what your doing. i am sure it works for you....
This is the kind of intellect I'd expect to see from someone who paid off their house on the punt
Question avoiding Liefzy would be proud of though - if she is a moral off a 4 week break but a lay off a 5 week lay off where does this magical fitness cliff kick in? Can't you see why this seems a little bit questionable?
You don't think it's horse dependantthere are statistics that show that horses win more in a certain time frame from when the date they raced before. Thats fact and has held up for decades. You ignore those facts and you will lose in the long run.
seems to be about 29 days from what i see which is effectively 5 weeks or significant change in grade as saturday to saturday is 28 days.
You don't think it's horse dependant
What about 28 v 35, all horses, Saturday grade?
SR% drops after 28 days. POT goes up but more indication of the robot's laying them because drop in SR
14 days: 31%/-9.8%
21 days: 31%/-9.0%
28 days: 31%/+4.8%
35 days: 27%/-0.1%
42 days: 21%/-59.0%
My intellect follows racing statistics in Australia because European statistics for Australian racing are 100 percent irrelevant.This is the kind of intellect I'd expect to see from someone who paid off their house on the punt
Question avoiding Liefzy would be proud of though - if she is a moral off a 4 week break but a lay off a 5 week lay off where does this magical fitness cliff kick in? Can't you see why this seems a little bit questionable?
Good stats - suggests to me old Heathsy has gone a week or so to early with his cliff theory
there are exceptions for sure. I actually think its trainer dependent. Back in the day i would back houlihan stayers and John leek stayers who did this because they consistently train winners like this.You don't think it's horse dependant
sort of.
the same horse at the same price still says 28 days better. It's just the SP indicates "they" lay them incorrectly when they are only slightly inferior at 35 days.
Vot? its price dependent not winning dependent.....Good stats - suggests to me old Heathsy has gone a week or so to early with his cliff theory
the only horses i lay are short priced Godolphin horses who keep losing yet keep starting short ....And if you'd layed Mystic Journey using this strategy so far her in career you'd already be bankrupt.