Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mloody mope soDoes his name rhyme with Modie Mundy?
He was quoted, by pretty much every single talent scout out there, as being the best KPP prospect across the board - skills, ability overhead or off the ground, ballwinning, leadership, in front of or behind the ball - in the last 15 years, or being the best talent available in the draft across that time. I'm not exaggerating at all.Luko is growing in stature with each successive post!
Here's my rejoinder, seeing as there are a fair few people disagreeing with me here.He has elite talent but I don't recall him ever being profiled as the 'leader of men' type you're making him out to be. If those who know make the call that he's leaving next year then it's in the club's interests to look at all their options to extract the best possible return.
Yep.I think you spell his name C R I P P S
Does his name rhyme with Modie Mundy?
We trade them two first rounders? Doens't gut our team and that's about as much as anyone has ever given up before. They couldn't ask for much more.Okay, let's say a man with the initials BG who plays for Collingwood and his name rhymes with Modie Mundy requests a trade to us, what the fu** do we even give up for him? Two firsts wouldn't even begin to be enough.
EDIT: The point I am trying to make is we couldn't get it done unless we pretty much gut our team.
All good things come to those who wait
We trade them two first rounders? Doens't gut our team and that's about as much as anyone has ever given up before. They couldn't ask for much more.
I'd imagine a little like this:i’d hate to see what arrows pms look like right now...
You’ll be running into a couple of dead ends with that trade.Oooooh which one? Or all three??!
View attachment 753053
Okay, I'll break the news
Papley today informed the club, well officially atleast (andswans) that he wants Carlton
Can we just take a minute to remember that the "BG" comment didn't come from Arrow or one of the ITK posters...
Billy Gowers or deathThere are only three BG's in the whole comp.
Brodie Grundy
Bryce Gibbs
Billy Gowers
Hey Arr0w is this the news??Okay, I'll break the news
Papley today informed the club, well officially anyway (and swans) that he wants Carlton
I'd imagine a little like this:
Navara79 was your BG comment a known info thing or wishful thinking?
He was quoted, by pretty much every single talent scout out there, as being the best KPP prospect across the board - skills, ability overhead or off the ground, ballwinning, leadership, in front of or behind the ball - in the last 15 years, or being the best talent available in the draft across that time. I'm not exaggerating at all.
Here's my rejoinder, seeing as there are a fair few people disagreeing with me here.
You're GC. You have a significant series of problems; your team has no traditional club pull, you're in a non-football state with the double issue of being in a bit of a party town (with all the influence that can have over a group of young men) and the first attempts at building this club failed because the officials in place completely misread both what they needed and how to treat their players. This has lead to a significant amount of the best players leaving for better pastures, and their quality being replaced by good honest triers.
Now, they've got something of a template for their success (provided they can follow it) in GWS. They got in massive amounts of first round draft picks; they surrounded that youth with mature talent in Mumford and Shaw (and Johnson, albeit a few years later) but they also supplemented their early draft stocks with quality players who were also leaders for their current clubs, in Ward, Scully and Davis. Now, that older tier of players has begun to drop off, the next tier of leaders (Coniglio, Greene) has begun to step up and take on onfield leadership roles, ensuring that while Johnson/Mumford/Shaw are retiring or their input is decreasing in quality the next rung down has standards to maintain, that when one player leaves another steps up; basically, the Hawthorn model during their premiership years. If you take it in minutiae, this is also a similar path laid out by Brisbane, albeit staggered; Brisbane lost a s**tload of players, got in KPP talent across multiple drafts, obtained players who have formed significant boons for them onfield as leaders in Beams, Robbo, and now Hodge, before adding midfield talent and leadership via the draft.
You also have both Brisbane and GWS losing players, but having those leaving changing; they go from players wanting out to players wanting opportunities, and going from players you cannot afford to lose to players you haven't tagged as essential.
So, GC recruits the best KPP prospect in recent history, coupled with his potentially equally talented offsider in Rankine; they supplement these draft picks with good honest hard working triers, mature bodies to ensure that they aren't getting pulverised on the field (merely the scoreboard). They ensure that they can continue this influx of talent by working with AFL HQ to obtain a beginning of first round PP, ensuring that the get two midfield prospects both earmarked as potential captains in Anderson and Rowell. You're working to turn the club around off-field, you removing the rumoured schism in the playing list left over by Ablett and you're making players accountable on gameday; baby steps. You surprised a few teams early in the season, because unlike previous years your work ethic is not subpar.
Suddenly, you're hearing in the media - and from player managers - that one of the keystones of your team is slated to receive multi million dollar offers from a number of other clubs.
How do you react to that, given your history with players leaving, with the template for success entailing that you cannot lose players unless you either have them in surplus (as is not the case for Lukosius) or you can afford to lose them (again, not the case). So, what do you do?
You could do precisely what you're suggesting (Crouch and 4) but this completely undermines what you're trying to accomplish. He's your future CHF or CHB (or tall winger, or ruckman; you name it, he can do it) and a potential captain. Who are you going to draft in this draft to compensate for his lack, not next year, but over the next 10?
The AFL would not allow him to leave any more than they would allow Coniglio (or any of the others receiving 'marketing' payments) to leave GWS. He would be offered a subpar contract at salary cap level, but would receive just crazy money outside of it. And, realistically, the AFL rather needs to shove their foot up the Adelaide club's arses anyway, because while the Vic clubs try to lure young players home we at least have to compete with each other to do it, and the kids we target generally are niche. Adelaide had their sight on Gibbs from the moment he was drafted, as they have Rankine and Lukosius, and you simply cannot have clubs behaving in such a parasitic manner towards other clubs. It isn't compatible with a sustainable competition.
Therefore, GC can and should completely dig their heels in and force titanic, colossal overs for him; I'm talking picks 4, their future first and second, and Crouch. Make them bleed, and offer them a kickstart to their rebuild over the next few years to compensate for taking what is a monumental risk in leaving what we have observed as a template for success.
SaluteOkay, I'll break the news
Papley today informed the club, well officially anyway (and swans) that he wants Carlton