Remove this Banner Ad

Bluemour Melting Pot XX - Snark Free Zone

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
poor blossoms, if it isn't big bad anti-carlton commentators, it's big bad anti-carlton sports writers or big bad anti-carlton umpires - grow up you stooges.....
You missed one, pathetically inept and biased umpires

tenor.gif
 
!!!TIN FOIL HAT TIME!!!

Gil and AFL House want the Suns and Swans up and about as quickly as possible and are happy to stiff us over to do so. As such, they have instructed Swans to hold firm on Papley. They've also instructed Gold Coast demand our pick 9 for Martin to help accelerate their rebuild.

Swans - keep Papley, get Daniher, lose pick 5

Suns - lose Martin, get pick 9

Blues - lose pick 9, get Martin

Essendon - loae Daniher, get pick 5

lol wut?

Carlton won't do Martin for 9.
Bombers won't do Daniher for only 1 pick.

Would rather take 2019 and 2020 1sts and try for Yeo.
If Gaff, I'd want to swap maybe this year's first rounders and get Martin with it.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If Papley’s is going to be too hard, just get Martin done with Betts and Butler.
Martin will be a better player than Papley IMO.
If we could then get Wines for pick 9 and maybe something else.
I also like the idea of Knight. Could come cheap, 7/10 player. Jared Lyons type.
Also, I’ll say it again: Cedric Cox
 
Intriguing...

Gonna spitball a few names for discussion's sake. These are guys I think would entertain leaving their current club for the right deal. Have ignored those who have recently re-signed and those who seem firmly entrenched, as well as those who you'd be too hard-pressed to describe as "elite" currently (ie. Cerra).

Out of contract in 2020 - Petracca, De Goey, Crouch
Get-out clause in contract - Gaff
Out of contract in 2021 - other Crouch, Hopper, Oliver
How does this player set us up for 2021? (according to OP) That's the bit I'm stumped on.
Now 7 years bad luck could refer to a ladder so with this player we can go for the cup then?
Or a black cat crossing our path or...
bare with me,
I'm thinking
Witchy Woman
Which is the eagles...

Yeah. Need a good cup of tea.
 
More detailed article on Pask giving Carlton a serve on the Ellis situation:


Some pretty strong language where he's quite strong in painting Carlton as the party in the wrong, like we were the ones that backed out last minute.

TCP said it was because Ellis asked for more money once we missed out on Cogs. Another previous rumour in this thread that we lowered our offer to Ellis to try to get Cogs. Timing wise it also seems possible that when Teague was made official and given more control, he made it clear he's not interested in Ellis.

Not sure we'll ever really know for sure.
 
WTF that is wild
Truth.

More detailed article on Pask giving Carlton a serve on the Ellis situation:


Some pretty strong language where he's quite strong in painting Carlton as the party in the wrong, like we were the ones that backed out last minute.

TCP said it was because Ellis asked for more money once we missed out on Cogs. Another previous rumour in this thread that we lowered our offer to Ellis to try to get Cogs. Timing wise it also seems possible that when Teague was made official and given more control, he made it clear he's not interested in Ellis.

Not sure we'll ever really know for sure.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Old news. Will never happen. Sydney ripped off hardcore if that was ever to happen.


AFL must be really torn between “making sure they make up for slapping Essendon with a wet lettuce leaf over their illegal drug taking” and “keeping their interstate love children strong” - and trying to ensure we get reamed all at the same time.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

lol wut?

Carlton won't do Martin for 9.
Bombers won't do Daniher for only 1 pick.

Would rather take 2019 and 2020 1sts and try for Yeo.
If Gaff, I'd want to swap maybe this year's first rounders and get Martin with it.
It wasn't a proposal. It was a theory about AFL interference.
 
AFL.com suggesting three team trade “looms”.

Essendon - picks 5 and 9

Sydney - Daniher

Blues - Papley

Apparently we are asking for something back too.


I'd expect Essendon would need to give something else up in that deal.

Slight tweak:

Essendon - picks 5 and 9 (for Daniher and Pick 31)

Sydney - Daniher and pick 31 (for Papley, Pick 5 and Pick 51)

Blues - Papley and pick 51 (for Pick 9)

Maybe Essendon substitute in their future second instead. Maybe Sydney substitute in their future first and keep either 5 or 9.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top