- Nov 6, 2014
- 60,859
- 74,855
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont know enough to have my own board.
I am genuinely curious about this one.
I have seen a number of posters rating this pick in hindsight which is encouraging.
Just wondering why noone seemed to rate him prior.
On SM-G960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
With Dixon, Marshall and a resting ruck (with Buzza as break glass) a mid-sized forward is ok.
Really need height down back though.
We CAN just use pic k#18
If this fella actually leads at the footy then going to Port games might be fun again. We haven't had someone make a lead since Sarge.Which is exactly the type of key forward we've been screaming out for for a decade
Despite Robertson being so highly rated, I notice his highlights vid hardly ever shows him kicking. Hmmm...
Not an easy decision about who to grab with that next pick.
Probably a player that will play 10-15 games next year, make an average impact and get some hype by the media but stagnate for the following years to follow..Robertson is an ordinary kick, is fairly slow and probably has minimal scope for improvement. Not that he was ever really rated a top 10 pick, i'm not really surprised he's slipped a bit.
If this fella actually leads at the footy then going to Port games might be fun again. We haven't had someone make a lead since Sarge.
According to the AFL we still have picks 22, 55, 60, 61. We will not cover a bid in the 20's for Mead with those numbers so...
We are probably going to need between 432 and 618 discounted points to match a bid depending where it comes. Adelaide have picks 24 and 25 so no prizes for guessing when the bid for Mead is most likely to come.
At the moment we have 465 points and for a bid at 24 or 25 we would need to cover 588 or 559 points.
I think we will be attempting to trade the 22 pick for a couple of picks to avoid a large deficit on Mead. If we could get someone to trade up for the 22 we could cover Mead and still have a couple of picks in the 60's.
It’s a bloody governance issue within the club.We’ll go a tall defender tomorrow (Worrell or Gould) or Bianco or Rivers.
Honestly, just pick Robertson and we can overlook the other nonsense.
We could have had Kemp and Robertson tonight.
I had him top 6 coming into this year. He fell for me because its hard to rate someone who plays zero games in their draft year.
Some midfield scope, but finally we have a strong, fast, leadup forward with a great kick and strong hands.
Its a good pick.
According to the AFL we still have picks 22, 55, 60, 61. We will not cover a bid in the 20's for Mead with those numbers so...
We are probably going to need between 432 and 618 discounted points to match a bid depending where it comes. Adelaide have picks 24 and 25 so no prizes for guessing when the bid for Mead is most likely to come.
At the moment we have 465 points and for a bid at 24 or 25 we would need to cover 588 or 559 points.
I think we will be attempting to trade the 22 pick for a couple of picks to avoid a large deficit on Mead. If we could get someone to trade up for the 22 we could cover Mead and still have a couple of picks in the 60's.
According to the AFL we still have picks 22, 55, 60, 61. We will not cover a bid in the 20's for Mead with those numbers so...
We are probably going to need between 432 and 618 discounted points to match a bid depending where it comes. Adelaide have picks 24 and 25 so no prizes for guessing when the bid for Mead is most likely to come.
At the moment we have 465 points and for a bid at 24 or 25 we would need to cover 588 or 559 points.
I think we will be attempting to trade the 22 pick for a couple of picks to avoid a large deficit on Mead. If we could get someone to trade up for the 22 we could cover Mead and still have a couple of picks in the 60's.