Effectively it means we currently are in line to get the 11th best rated player not f/s or academy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Effectively it means we currently are in line to get the 11th best rated player not f/s or academy.
fixed as in its not tied to their finishing position...That’s what I thought too Pure but if you listen to the draft podcast Troy Selwood says twice that part of the attraction of the trade was that pick 11 was fixed and it’s position cannot change??
.To the Final Bell: Draft Special
A special draft edition of the official Geelong Cats podcast has landed!www.geelongcats.com.au
I think we will be a great position with all these academy picks to do small trades like Freo and GCS did to turn those 3 picks into 4 or 5. I mean two clubs already go in with deficits.
We know clubs go mental to move up 2 spots just so they can take an extra player. Trades like 11 for 15 + 20
Just need clubs to bloody bid on these kids!!!
Yeah I get all that and that was my original belief too...but what I don’t understand is his emphasis on that it’s different to other picks because it’s fixed. If it moves back with matched bids, which is what I think you guys are saying, doesn’t that make it the same as other picks???
Yes in position to have options ... how ever we will need to assess what our lists need.. at the moment do we need more youth or do we need 1 or 2 young stars... how many will be retiring ..do we have that covered etc etc. As it stood this year we had to delist players with contracts to bring in 4 players... if we have even better picks .. I dont doubt we would be willing to do the same again if required.
ThisWith GWS required to trade back in for points just to cover their deficit we are in prime position to exploit that. I’d offer one of our firsts for Caldwell. Use the other two on the best kids we can get.
With GWS required to trade back in for points just to cover their deficit we are in prime position to exploit that. I’d offer one of our firsts for Caldwell. Use the other two on the best kids we can get.
With GWS required to trade back in for points just to cover their deficit we are in prime position to exploit that. I’d offer one of our firsts for Caldwell. Use the other two on the best kids we can get.
They aren't required to trade back in for points it just hits their existing picks even though they traded out their future 1st before the draft, that might be a loophole that needs to be closed.
Furthermore points aren't deducted from picks they trade in.
I reckon GWS would be crazy not to consider an offer of Caldwell for a first. I'd go in asking for Caldwell and Hately for WCE 1stIn think YOTC may have expressed slightly off par ... what is the facts atm.... do GWS have a draft deficit for 2020? And if , as predicted the have another group of academy players , Greens brother ec ... one would think they would be interested in trading out an under used asset like Caldwell and XOH to thicken their picks and points .
They aren't required to trade back in for points it just hits their existing picks even though they traded out their future 1st before the draft, that might be a loophole that needs to be closed.
Furthermore points aren't deducted from picks they trade in.
I reckon GWS would be crazy not to consider an offer of Caldwell for a first. I'd go in asking for Caldwell and Hately for WCE 1st
My understanding was that the picks they have for 2020 doesn’t cover the deficit. Is that right?
Doubt we’d get that. In any case I’d say that Adel will come hard for Hately. But we should be targeting one of them. XOH another to consider with a 2nd rounder perhaps?
Yeah they'd probably say no but I'd start the conversation somewhere similar. XOH might be the better sweetner. Having so many list spots invested in similar players makes little sense and XOH/Hately have to know they're a long shot at seniors for a while. Caldwell more likely but he'd have higher expectations than that.Doubt we’d get that. In any case I’d say that Adel will come hard for Hately. But we should be targeting one of them. XOH another to consider with a 2nd rounder perhaps?
Taranto would be nice but I think GWS would clean us out for himWould also consider n offer for Taranto but yes we are in a prime position to get 1 or 2 young players from them if we want
And still keep a 1st rounder for the draft
Would also consider n offer for Taranto but yes we are in a prime position to get 1 or 2 young players from them if we want
And still keep a 1st rounder for the draft
Taranto would be nice but I think GWS would clean us out for him
Exactly. I think the two clubs would be in polar opposites for list management in that GWS will have specific list needs they'll want to draft or trade for whereas the cats will be seeing so much list churn that we'd be in a much better position to go best available. The best available for one of our late firsts is unlikely to be better than Caldwell but could be a player suiting a need for GWS. Win winThey wont trade best 22 players like taranto nor would he want to leave. They will trade their 23-28 types which is your caldwell hately cumming xoh etc types depending on who wants to leave and what other clubs can attract them.
Taranto would be nice but I think GWS would clean us out for him
Finlayson, XOH and Caldwell I would be happy to chase...I think Cameron will sign next year to stay sadlyIf you are talking OOC players at GWS for 2020 the main ones are Whitfield (FA) Cameron (FA) Williams Finlayson Caldwell Hately Cumming XOH Corr Langdon Perryman and Lloyd. I doubt the first three are going anywhere but i imagine most of the rest are gettable for the right price.