-
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
The on topic thread 2.0
- Thread starter jod23
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Wow, huge. Not over though I reckon, City have got the cash to fight this all the way.
moomba
TheBrownDog
I expected it, and aren't going to get too worked up about it. If the worst that happens is we miss a few years of champions League, I already went through that the first twenty years I supported the club.You should love every minute of it. Because you probably don’t care.
The worst thing for me would have been a negotiated settlement.
No real choice but to fight, and I'm sure that's what we'll do.
I'm looking forward to it.
moomba
TheBrownDog
RPCB
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #7,305
City’s transfer dealings will be interesting without European football. Players want CL football but not enough that extra money as compensation for not playing CL can’t fix. I think ultimately City will be fine in the transfer market. What might happen is this will quicken Pep’s exit from the club, though.
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Pep will walk surely if the ban holds. It has far more ramifications than just missing 2 years of CL football. Could see Poch going to City if that happens
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Really though this had to happen, most people on here said it all along (Zidane and myself being the most vocal), City were breaking the rules with the sponsorships they were receiving. It didn’t make sense to anyone with half a brain that this relatively small club could receive spinsorships that were dwarfing the likes of Madrid, Barcelona and United. It’s a good day for football imo
moomba
TheBrownDog
Our sponsorships were never bigger than United, Madrid, Barca etc.
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Still in denial. I’m not listening to you on this anymore because you are completely unable to accept the reality of the situation
- Moderator
- #7,311
moomba
TheBrownDog
- Moderator
- #7,313
It's not about the sponsors being big or small it's more that they are paying for that incoming money themselves. And the dodgy stuff about their players wages too.
Yeah, surely it's appealed and the ban is overturned.
City have too many good players and it's all about money. UEFA want the best players to play in the CL and City have a heap of them.
City have too many good players and it's all about money. UEFA want the best players to play in the CL and City have a heap of them.
00Stinger
100 - 7
if this was a Spanish team no ban would be implemented
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I know that, sorry if I didn’t make clear. They’ve inflated their sponsorship because essentially they’re paying the club money themselves. It’s a complete con
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Lol what a ridiculous post
Cool.
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
It’s why I have you up there with Jod as the most biased poster on here. Your denial is off the scale on this
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
You are a City fan aren’t you? Come clean ffs
moomba
TheBrownDog
If you say so.
Posted my opinion.
Stop walking around with a pitchfork trying to poke anyone with it whose views you don't agree with.
- Moderator
- #7,323
Why would UEFA ban them in the first place then?
I think they'll go to CAS and it'll be reduced to 1.
When has whatever UEFA done made any sense?
They hate English clubs and always look to make an example of them.
As someone said, if it was a Spanish club it would never have happened. Could you imagine them banning Barca or Real from the CL? Didn't think so.
- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Stop chatting s**t and I’ll leave you alone
- Status
