Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought Dunkley's role looked ok in round 1, and that the Bulldogs just had a rubbish game. Whitfield I'm less confident in, since he won't get to junk it up, and with Taranto likely back for R2. Sauce to Grundy is swapping cash generation for points. Do you have another underperformer to upgrade?In theory if we get 3 trades I can do:
Dunkley/Whitfield/Jacobs -> Viney/Wingard/Grundy.
But then I feel sick just looking at that. There's a reason I picked the left hand side and not right.
I still think left options should ourscore the right 99 times out of 100 and yet they got absolutely pantsed in R1.
As Benny boy would say, such is life.
In theory if we get 3 trades I can do:
Dunkley/Whitfield/Jacobs -> Viney/Wingard/Grundy.
But then I feel sick just looking at that. There's a reason I picked the left hand side and not right.
I still think left options should ourscore the right 99 times out of 100 and yet they got absolutely pantsed in R1.
As Benny boy would say, such is life.
I thought Dunkley's role looked ok in round 1, and that the Bulldogs just had a rubbish game. Whitfield I'm less confident in, since he won't get to junk it up, and with Taranto likely back for R2. Sauce to Grundy is swapping cash generation for points. Do you have another underperformer to upgrade?
FWIW, I'm planning to keep Dunkley and Sauce, and am thinking about trading Whitfield to Wingard or Bewley.
(Also, I reckon that returning best 22 players are going to force a stack of the common rookies out - so R2 trades might end up being about patching holes rather than upgrades.)
What are our thoughts on Jeremy Howe lads? Just had a quick geez then and he went 127 (20 min quarters) from the one Marsh match and then 110 in rd1. Currently priced around 75 so would have to avg around 90 to justify the pick.
I agree, not because I may need it, but because of the principle. What has it been, about 9 weeks since they played?I am so clueless with what to do in terms of trades! I had a decent Round 1 score, but i look at my team and think Id change so much about my team now!!! Heres hoping we get a few more trades to fix up the teams before Round 2. I think 5 would be a good number. Supercoach has given 5, so lets hope Fantasy can follow. Cause 3 aint enough ahah.
I had a pretty good score Round 1 even with Birchall late out... kind of meh on thinking about it further until teams come out though. If i had perfect rookies there are a few moves i'd make, but i doubt i'm going to have perfect rookies this season.I am so clueless with what to do in terms of trades! I had a decent Round 1 score, but i look at my team and think Id change so much about my team now!!! Heres hoping we get a few more trades to fix up the teams before Round 2. I think 5 would be a good number. Supercoach has given 5, so lets hope Fantasy can follow. Cause 3 aint enough ahah.
I really rate this decision, benefits those who had good teams going into Round 2, means they have the chance to luxury trade while others claw back a starting side. But equally, it means by Round 3 or 4 people should start to have full bences again and we'll be back to normal. You're rolling format isn't a bad idea but would lead to a lot of the top teams looking very similar as they ship off underperformers for the lowest BE breakout candidates, while it might feel like giving 5 trades would help struggling teams, it would give the top teams so much of an advantage they'd push the gap out even further.Would have preferred a rolling reduced trade format (5 this week, 4 next week, 3 the next week then 2 ) but I guess this will have to do.