- Aug 18, 2018
- 38,852
- 69,333
- AFL Club
- Geelong
That defensive clusterf$#% is a defined strategy so why are we doing it? My half arsed theory is that CS thinks sides are going to look at the reduced time and burn themselves out trying to maintain full intensity the whole match. So the strategy is to absorb pressure and then try and push them in the second half.
If this is something we're choosing to do then 0/2 success rate is not looking good. But is this the first choice strategy? Surely not. I think it's highky likely that we have come back from lockdown in worse shape than much of the comp and the Hawks dropping their collective bundle hid it. Coaching group may be attempting to come up with something that keeps us in games late. This also goes a way to explaining why the kids aren't being played as the older players will benefit from their higher endurance base and the residual fitness this gives. The kids that are in are ones that have good endurance bases already like miers and Henry
That's my best shot at an explanation for this snoozefest. If I'm right then a few more matches should be all it takes to get to a more attacking strategy so I guess we're going to find out soon enough.
To focus on positives:
I really liked what parfitt did. Henry was better. Fort was beaten but it wasn't embarrassing. Guthrie and Menegola were good I thought, MOC the odd mistake but by and large did well after Stewart went down. Steven was better i guess but still not great and I probably wouldn't play him next week.
Changes are required however.
Obvious ones:
Atkins out for Fogarty surely has to happen now.
Stewart out Taylor in a straight swap.
Up for discussion:
Bews out for Clark. We're looking to do one of two things at all times right now. 90% of the time we're playing keepings off and 10% of the time we're attacking. Both require effective foot skills and Clark is the man for that playing off half back.
If this is something we're choosing to do then 0/2 success rate is not looking good. But is this the first choice strategy? Surely not. I think it's highky likely that we have come back from lockdown in worse shape than much of the comp and the Hawks dropping their collective bundle hid it. Coaching group may be attempting to come up with something that keeps us in games late. This also goes a way to explaining why the kids aren't being played as the older players will benefit from their higher endurance base and the residual fitness this gives. The kids that are in are ones that have good endurance bases already like miers and Henry
That's my best shot at an explanation for this snoozefest. If I'm right then a few more matches should be all it takes to get to a more attacking strategy so I guess we're going to find out soon enough.
To focus on positives:
I really liked what parfitt did. Henry was better. Fort was beaten but it wasn't embarrassing. Guthrie and Menegola were good I thought, MOC the odd mistake but by and large did well after Stewart went down. Steven was better i guess but still not great and I probably wouldn't play him next week.
Changes are required however.
Obvious ones:
Atkins out for Fogarty surely has to happen now.
Stewart out Taylor in a straight swap.
Up for discussion:
Bews out for Clark. We're looking to do one of two things at all times right now. 90% of the time we're playing keepings off and 10% of the time we're attacking. Both require effective foot skills and Clark is the man for that playing off half back.




