Transfer discussion thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
kaiserchief13 said:
Both Goetze and Lewandowski would have left BL if Bayrrn didn't sign them. Why should bayern not try and improve their teams with low risk players (already in Germany, speak language, culture etc).

If you're complaining about free transfers don't let players run down contract and sell them before end of contract
Click to expand...

It’s not that easy when they’ve had KHR in their ear promising a big sign on fee if they leave at the end of their contrast.

The whole thing with Sane was disgusting. You had a Bayern player talking to the media about him every week. There’s a reason every single German apart from Bayern and VFL Bochum fans hate Bayern - and it ain’t because they’re successful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
wadistance said:
It’s not that easy when they’ve had KHR in their ear promising a big sign on fee if they leave at the end of their contrast.

The whole thing with Sane was disgusting. You had a Bayern player talking to the media about him every week. There’s a reason every single German apart from Bayern and VFL Bochum fans hate Bayern - and it ain’t because they’re successful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
So ungrateful Dortmund would be where without donations from Bayern??
 
wadistance said:
Actually, Götze and Lewandowski were purchased/tapped up right after Dortmund had upset the status quo of German power rankings

Suele was signed along with Rudy(free) and Sandro Wagner, the year they finished 3rd and looked to begin challenging.

It’s never the what with Bayern. It’s the how. And the free transfers are what the rest of the league ******* hate. Bayern have twice as much money as the next club, and then complain that there’s no competition. At least pay other teams what their players are worth


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

4 of Dortmund's starting XI in the 2013 Champions League final were free transfers from "smaller clubs". So is it ok for you guys to do it to others but if someone does it to you then they are out of line?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

chef said:
Go CAS.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty comfortable that we've had a fair hearing and a decision will be based on the facts. Not one credible leak so far (as opposed to when UEFA is in charge), as a result I wouldn't have a clue which way it will go tomorrow.
 
moomba said:
I'm pretty comfortable that we've had a fair hearing and a decision will be based on the facts. Not one credible leak so far (as opposed to when UEFA is in charge), as a result I wouldn't have a clue which way it will go tomorrow.
Click to expand...

UEFA stating that there would be a problem if the allegations were proven true is not a leak and CAS dismissed your claims in any case about that. Very similar to awaiting the UEFA outcome last time, nobody knew what it would be with no leaks and many were surprised when the ban was announced.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Zidane98 said:
UEFA stating that there would be a problem if the allegations were proven true is not a leak and CAS dismissed your claims in any case about that. Very similar to awaiting the UEFA outcome last time, nobody knew what it would be with no leaks and many were surprised when the ban was announced.
Click to expand...

I know you've got selective blindness on this case but CAS called the leaks very worrisome and referred to three articles in particular iirc.

Those articles specifically referred to things that must only have been known by someone involved in the case, and in their judgement CAS said that they can't understand how UEFA can say with any confidence that the leaks didn't come from them.

Tony Evans (Rick Parry) and Tariq Panja (David Gill) called the actual penalty days before the outcome was publicised. Perhaps they got lucky, and their close relationship to two people closely involved in the process was a coincidence.
 
moomba said:
I know you've got selective blindness on this case but CAS called the leaks very worrisome and referred to three articles in particular iirc.

Those articles specifically referred to things that must only have been known by someone involved in the case, and in their judgement CAS said that they can't understand how UEFA can say with any confidence that the leaks didn't come from them.

Tony Evans (Rick Parry) and Tariq Panja (David Gill) called the actual penalty days before the outcome was publicised. Perhaps they got lucky, and their close relationship to two people closely involved in the process was a coincidence.
Click to expand...

There were plenty also calling that City would not be banned, its simply a case of journalists speculating, just like some of your sources now are claiming that City are innocent.


As for the CAS judgement reading through it they dismissed your claims as frivolous, awarded costs against you and stated that your concerns should be directed to a UEFA tribunal and that your claims were inadmissable at CAS. They also stated any suggested leaks did not materially affect the investigation in any manner so were irrelevant in any case.

Just like last time there is speculation from both sides with no leaks.
 
Zidane98 said:
There were plenty also calling that City would not be banned, its simply a case of journalists speculating, just like some of your sources now are claiming that City are innocent.


As for the CAS judgement reading through it they dismissed your claims as frivolous, awarded costs against you and stated that your concerns should be directed to a UEFA tribunal and that your claims were inadmissable at CAS. They also stated any suggested leaks did not materially affect the investigation in any manner so were irrelevant in any case.

Just like last time there is speculation from both sides with no leaks.
Click to expand...
How would City leak that we weren't going to be banned?

We didn't make the decision, UEFA did.


The Athletic wrote that we were going to escape a ban, that came from Ceferin offering us a deal. But we said no. I can't recall another article, and when CAS said the leaks were very worrisome they were referring to UEFA, not us.
 
Zidane98 said:
Reus poached for peanuts also.
Click to expand...
He was an academy player who left and came back when he was 18 years old.

That's hardly the same thing as encouraging someone in the senior national team set up to run down their contract so you can sign them on a free
 
Bradesmaen said:
www.bbc.com

Liverpool's Lovren close to Zenit move

Liverpool defender Dejan Lovren is close to joining Russian club Zenit St Petersburg for a fee near to £11m.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

Premier League Champion, so of course they want him to stay.
Click to expand...
Zenit want to sign him on a free, we are bluffing to trigger a 1 year extension if they don't give us a fee (I'm guessing 5-10mil).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

RossFC
Transfer Discussion Thread
192 193 194 195 196
Replies
5K
Views
118K
SM
SM
Bojan KantKick
  • Locked
Transfer discussion thread
396 397 398 399 400
Replies
10K
Views
229K
RossFC
RossFC
Bostonian
The Sportswashing mega thread.
5 6 7 8 9
Replies
224
Views
9K
Zidane98
Zidane98
chef
2023/24 Predictions Thread
2 3
Replies
66
Views
3K
Frank Bunn
F
JeffreyCC
Celtic FC - Follow the Bhoys Thread
Replies
9
Views
664
JeffreyCC
JeffreyCC
giggler99
Auckland FC Thread
Replies
14
Views
873
acm21
acm21
Zidane98
Official 2023/2024 Uber Eats Ligue 1 / French football thread (On Bein Sports)
2 3
Replies
69
Views
4K
Upstart Swan
Upstart Swan

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top