Politics Wuhan Coronavirus (COVID-19): The politics thread

Remove this Banner Ad



Germany’s Extra-parliamentary Inquiry on COVID-19



an internal report of the Federal Ministry of the Interior has determined that 90% of all necessary operations in Germany were not carried out, which affected 2.5 million people. And also in this report it is written that 5,000 to 125,000 patients have died as a result of the government measures.


the only thing that comes from the government is the constant call for vaccination for a disease of which we now know very well, through many international studies, that it is very comparable with flu diseases, that the mortality rates are no higher than with strong flu waves

It is a frightening ignorance on the part of recognized international studies and experts from all fields, whether they be virologists, bacteriologists, epidemiologists or even economists, who are simply not being heard or are being ignored. Worse still, they are called liars, charlatans, or conspiracy theorists,
 
PCR Tests Debacle
Walter Lippmann once declared,

“Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”


The RNA samples taken from in vitro trials for which PCR tests are calibrated cannot conclusively be said to belong to a specific virus, COVID-19, nor is there proof that those RNA sequences are the causative agent for this allegedly dire scourge, in a particular instance.


The Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences conceded that PCR tests are only “30 to 50 per cent accurate.”

Just as an instance, the health authority in China’s Guandong province reported in the Journal of Medical Virology that 29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had three to six test results that flipped between “negative,” “positive” and “dubious.”

Another example is from a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back to “positive” at least once and up to 5 times in one patient. These are not outlier findings by any stretch of the reported or published medical literature.


The Norwegian Health Authority, adding an unsentimental Scandinavian perspective to this, now declares that 14 out of 15 tests for COVID-19 might be false positives.

CDC Real-Time Diagnostic Panel: “Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.” It goes on to say, “This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.” Surely, a devastating critique, absurdly overlooked and bypassed.

And not to be outdone, the FDA declares “…positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.” A blare of trumpets should surely be forthcoming.

And indeed, instruction manuals of PCR tests admit they are not intended “as” a diagnostic test but to “aid” diagnosis. In a passing outbreak of candor, one of the leading test manuals declares, “For research only, not for purposes of diagnosis.”



the scam continues unabated

lockdown, lockdown, no school, keep your kids inside!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Another fear mongering scam from the hysterical ninnies put to bed.


“The sources that claimed that the coronavirus would infect during the incubation period lack scientific support for this analysis in their articles,” says a document with frequently asked questions the agency posted on its website yesterday. “This applies, among other things, to an article in [NEJM] that has subsequently proven to contain major flaws and errors.” Even if the patient’s symptoms were unspecific, it wasn’t an asymptomatic infection, says Isaac Bogoch, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Toronto. “Asymptomatic means no symptoms, zero. It means you feel fine. We have to be careful with our words.”
 
One of the big points of lockdown is around asymptomatic spread which is an out and out lie or falsehood - take your pick.

The other big point is the mortality rate which is shown repeatedly to be flu like mortality rates

yet, we have the same losers calling for lockdwns and ignoring both points, ignoring the facts with the MSM complicit.
 
The anti-science crusade continues:



The Trump administration has ordered hospitals to bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and send all Covid-19 patient information to a central database in Washington beginning on Wednesday. The move has alarmed health experts who fear the data will be politicized or withheld from the public.

The new instructions were posted recently in a little-noticed document on the Department of Health and Human Services website. From now on, the department — not the C.D.C. — will collect daily reports about the patients that each hospital is treating, the number of available beds and ventilators, and other information vital to tracking the pandemic.
 
The anti-science crusade continues:



The Trump administration has ordered hospitals to bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and send all Covid-19 patient information to a central database in Washington beginning on Wednesday. The move has alarmed health experts who fear the data will be politicized or withheld from the public.

The new instructions were posted recently in a little-noticed document on the Department of Health and Human Services website. From now on, the department — not the C.D.C. — will collect daily reports about the patients that each hospital is treating, the number of available beds and ventilators, and other information vital to tracking the pandemic.

Good, we may get some truth and reliable stats.
 
Politics of protests. The Oz wants the protests to have caused SOMETHING seeing as they hung their hat on that idea.

But there seems to be cognitive dissonance in that the Hansonite/Sky/Oz reader wants Covid to be nothing to worry about... but also the oldies don't want to die... it's almost like making stuff up to pander to an audience has painted them into a corner.


It appears to boil down to this: a couple of people had coronavirus before, at or just after the rally. Unsure if they contracted it there or beforehand. One of those people went to work at H&M Northland, and gave it to others. Then, a month later, some other people who'd been to the rally tested positive.

Oh, and also, state health experts do not advise that these clusters stemmed from the Melbourne protest.

And that's... about it! To recap: one possible transmission, a spread at an H&M shop, and some other people who got the virus a month on. A virus with an average 7-14 day incubation period.

What a bomb drop.





" knee-humping DV chihuahua Avi Yemini "

HAHAHAHAAA.
 
Last edited:
No one is surprised really https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic, has been exposing this on twitter for some time, this twitter user has much info on it.



Data reported by the CDC indicates that the China coronavirus reached its peak in mortality in April. The number deaths reported this past week included thousands of deaths from April. The CDC doesn’t share that the deaths reported in a given week include deaths from months ago.
 
Harald

@HaraldofW



23 patients in Stockholm ICU as of today due to #covid19. How many times during that downward slope have people been saying ‘just wait two weeks’?



1594797987079.png

no masks, no lockdown, no shops closed, no schools closed, no sporting facilities closed, no business closed, work from home if you want, no bars or restaurants closed ..... just wait 2 weeks i suppose.
 

The COVID-19 death rate is higher in European countries with a low flu intensity since 2018, says a working paper by Chris Hope of Cambridge Judge Business School.

The death rate from COVID-19 (coronavirus) in Europe appears to be linked to low-intensity flu seasons in the past two years as the same people are vulnerable, says a working paper by Dr Chris Hope, Emeritus Reader in Policy Modelling at Cambridge Judge Business School.

In the UK, for example, there are about 20,000 excess deaths from influenza in a typical year according to Public Health England, however, there were only about 1,700 excess flu deaths in 2018-2019 and there is anecdotal and statistical evidence that the 2019-2020 flu season was also very mild in the UK, the paper says.

“This implies that there were over 30,000 people alive in the UK at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic who would have been expected to die in the previous two flu seasons. These people are likely to have been predominantly elderly and in poor health,”



..................

experts have noticed the ink for some time, you wont see it any time soon on the news, the hysterical ninnies on the other hand haven't been able to put 2 and 2 together, how can they-huddled in fear in the basement with a mask on ...

the lilting tones of Ivor Cummins explains


 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Th scam continues ......


One reason for this due is a statistical flaw in the way that PHE compiles ‘out of hospital’ deaths data, rather than any genuine difference between the regions of the UK:


Here, it seems that PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not. PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the COVID test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community. Anyone who has tested COVID positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE COVID death figures.

By this PHE definition, no one with COVID in England is allowed to ever recover from their illness. A patient who has tested positive, but successfully treated and discharged from hospital, will still be counted as a COVID death even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a bus three months later.
 
Th scam continues ......


One reason for this due is a statistical flaw in the way that PHE compiles ‘out of hospital’ deaths data, rather than any genuine difference between the regions of the UK:


Here, it seems that PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not. PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the COVID test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community. Anyone who has tested COVID positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE COVID death figures.

By this PHE definition, no one with COVID in England is allowed to ever recover from their illness. A patient who has tested positive, but successfully treated and discharged from hospital, will still be counted as a COVID death even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a bus three months later.

I was quite shocked at that authority figure - claiming months back

If a person terminally ill, projected to die very soon of a condition, gets corona it still qualified as a corona death
.
 
I was quite shocked at that authority figure - claiming months back

If a person terminally ill, projected to die very soon of a condition, gets corona it still qualified as a corona death
.

Same thing would have happened with the Spanish flu, plague etc. So for historical context this is probably a good thing.

Not that they had actual test kits back then, but's that's a completely different argument.
 
I was quite shocked at that authority figure - claiming months back

If a person terminally ill, projected to die very soon of a condition, gets corona it still qualified as a corona death
.

That was in America, this scam is running in the UK after the UK Governements debasement of normal death registration procedures in England and Wales, under the 2020 Coronavirus Act, it has become virtually impossible to identify cause of death within the resulting statistics.

if you ever get covid in the UK eventually it seems you will die of it, even if you dont.

This is the one you are thinking of ....




that makes George Floyd a covid death.
 
Same thing would have happened with the Spanish flu, plague etc. So for historical context this is probably a good thing.

Not that they had actual test kits back then, but's that's a completely different argument.


i doubt if someone died of a clear alternate cause that they would have said spanish flu, but believe what you want
 
And more of the same, every day all day ....




ORLANDO, Fla. - A person who died in a motorcycle accident was added to Florida’s COVID-19 death count, according to a state health official.

FOX 35 News found this out after asking Orange County Health Officer Dr. Raul Pino whether two coronavirus victims who were in their 20s had any underlying conditions. One of his answers surprised us.


“The first one didn’t have any. He died in a motorcycle accident,” Pino said.

Dr. Pino was asked if the man’s data was removed.


“I don’t think so. I have to double-check,” Pino said. “We were arguing, discussing, or trying to argue with the state. Not because of the numbers -- it’s 100…it doesn’t make any difference if it's 99 -- but the fact that the individual didn’t die from COVID-19…died in the crash. But you could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash. I don’t know the conclusion of that one.”
 
More anti science from the anti science government of Victoria

1595128839882.png

1595128862002.png
1595128885957.png

Also considering WHO has done its best backflip over its last scare mongering tactic of asymptomatic spread, if you are not coughing or spluttering why wear a mask, the drool, spit and wetness makes these masks more permeable and who knows what germs can be created in that little cesspool, by the by covid is one micron and masks let in 3 microns.

typical insanity as per usual around this from the hysterical weak left
 

Here is a clue. On July 12, Deborah Cohen, the medical correspondent of BBC2’s Newsnight, revealed an astonishing thing. The World Health Organisation (WHO) had reversed its advice on face masks, from ‘don’t wear them’ to ‘do wear them’.
But the key fact was that it had not done so because of scientific information – the evidence had not backed the wearing of face coverings – but because of political lobbying.


In March, the WHO had said: ‘There is currently no evidence that wearing a mask (whether medical or other types) by healthy persons in the wider community setting, including universal community masking, can protect them from infection with respiratory viruses, including Covid-19.’

The American TV news channel CNN reported on March 31 that Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO health emergencies programme, had said at a briefing in Geneva: ‘There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit.
‘In fact, there’s some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly.’



Earlier that same month, England’s chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, had said that wearing face masks would do little to combat the outbreak.
While noting that if someone was infected, they might reduce the danger of spreading the disease by covering their faces, Prof Whitty said wearing a face mask had almost no effect on reducing the risk of contracting the illness.

He stated: ‘In terms of wearing a mask, our advice is clear: that wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all. So we do not advise that.’
 
1595201188785.png

WHO advises asymptomatic spread is about as scarce as hens teeth, although they have yet to prove it has even happened.

political pathetic anti science lockdown and now muzzles, what a sad weak sorry lot we are
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top