Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Port Forum 'General AFL Talk' Thread Part 15

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sainters position I see as being similar to what we did when we brought in Mots, Watts and Rocky. We brought them in to take our shot in 2018 & 2019 because we thought that was our time.

They brought in Hill, Ryder, Jones, Butler, to compete in the next year or two.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

'The young Port team' a bigger myth than Atlantis and so obvious that even Blighty highlights it correctly in his old nutter ramblings.
I happen to
'The young Port team' a bigger myth than Atlantis and so obvious that even Blighty highlights it correctly in his old nutter ramblings.
I happen to see it differently. What I recognise is that we can build a successful team around the quality of our younger group. Sure we have a few players in their twilight no doubt. But this constant banging on about this ageing group is crap. You can have a whole heap of young players, but are they any good. The focus purely on age is a load of bullshit as it also comes down to talent. The way the afl is these days, success is a whole lot more that constantly getting first round draft picks. If we can replace some of our ageing players with decent free agents etc over the next couple of years, then with the quality of our younger players we can challenge. But to suggest we will fall off a cliff is total bs.
 
Yeah, I assume this was directed at me? I do try to deal in fact and not the mythological narrative the club has been peddling for the past couple of years that would have dullards and simps believe we’re a team overflowing with raw children, and not one that up until recently was running with the third oldest lineup behind Hawthorn and Geelong.
Me too. See my post above.
 
This is not an opinion though, you can't say 'each to their own' when it's fact. We're not a young list or a young squad. Our 22 with kids is hilariously offset by a bunch of blokes above 28 years old and 150 games.

Just yikes.
No one is suggesting that we are an ultra young group. But we do have a lot of young talent that we can build a decent team around going forward.
 
No one is suggesting that we are an ultra young group. But we do have a lot of young talent that we can build a decent team around going forward.
Do we? We have a lot of young players, but are they any good? We don't know because Ken aint picking them over the geriatric brigade.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

oouch Bennell missed a sitter with Melbourne coming hard at Brisbane .And Cameron showed him how it's done at the other end of the ground.
 
Port 2004 tribey neither of you are wrong. We can be an old team on average while still fielding a number of young players. Both of those things can be true at the same time.

We played Rozee, Butters, Duursma, Marshall, Ladhams, Georgiades, Houston, Powell-Pepper, Farrell last night, we would've played Burton if he wasn't injured. Plenty of clubs would kill to have 10 U23 players of that quality. But our average age and experience gets dragged up by the fact that we also have a lot of guys at the other end of their careers, and very little in between.
 
But to suggest we will fall off a cliff is total bs.

Ages as of Round 1, 2021

Westhoff: 34
Gray: 33
Boak: 32
Ebert: 31
Rockliff: 31
Hartlett: 30
Dixon: 30
Jonas: 30
Motlop: 30
Watts: 30
McKenzie: 29

But hey, because we’re playing around 6-8 guys who are Under 23 each week (just like everyone else) we’ll not only be fine, but be even better than the past 5 years?
 
Port 2004 tribey neither of you are wrong. We can be an old team on average while still fielding a number of young players. Both of those things can be true at the same time.

We played Rozee, Butters, Duursma, Marshall, Ladhams, Georgiades, Houston, Powell-Pepper, Farrell last night, we would've played Burton if he wasn't injured. Plenty of clubs would kill to have 10 U23 players of that quality. But our average age and experience gets dragged up by the fact that we also have a lot of guys at the other end of their careers, and very little in between.
Spot on. Great post
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Doesn't seem to bother Brisbane much, they'e smashing the clearances despite their ruck getting pantsed.
Melbourne are a very frustrating side but.Weiderman has missed 4 shots 35 m out from goal.Bennell Gawn himself and a few others.The Dees have had more than enough quality footy fwd but have just blew it.
 
Port 2004 tribey neither of you are wrong. We can be an old team on average while still fielding a number of young players. Both of those things can be true at the same time.

We played Rozee, Butters, Duursma, Marshall, Ladhams, Georgiades, Houston, Powell-Pepper, Farrell last night, we would've played Burton if he wasn't injured. Plenty of clubs would kill to have 10 U23 players of that quality. But our average age and experience gets dragged up by the fact that we also have a lot of guys at the other end of their careers, and very little in between.

We basically have the same team age profile as Brisbane.
 
Ages as of Round 1, 2021

Westhoff: 34
Gray: 33
Boak: 32
Ebert: 31
Rockliff: 31
Hartlett: 30
Dixon: 30
Jonas: 30
Motlop: 30
Watts: 30
McKenzie: 29

But hey, because we’re playing around 6-8 guys who are Under 23 each week (just like everyone else) we’ll not only be fine, but be even better than the past 5 years?
Very selective posting just to support your argument. Schulzenfest post is more reflective of the true position of our list.
 
I also think age is a better measure than experience. The Saints have a ton of mature age pickups like Marshall, Butler, Wilkie, Hind, Parker who are already in their mid 20's but who were late starters at AFL level, so still sneak into the under 50 games category.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top