I really hope the AFL do provide list sizes ASAP.
It's really poor that they haven't sorted this out yet.
The coaches obviously aren't happy about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I really hope the AFL do provide list sizes ASAP.
Tim Kelly was 23 when he played his first game.
If they do reduce sizes then I think they also have to reduce the 3 pick minimum (inc rookie upgrade). Maybe it goes to 2 required picks, we upgrade Gibbons to the senior list and take 1 pick.
3 - Dow
4 - LDu
5- Cerra
6 - Stephenson
7 - Hunter Clark
8 - Coffield
9 - Naughton
10 - Lachie O'brien
I remember this draft, and being super keen on LDU who is probably ended up a bigger bust than Dow.. With the exception of Naughton, none of these players are setting the world on fire.. and with McKay & Charlie Curnow its understandable why we didnt take Naughton.. I just think this is a pretty ordinary draft year and Paddy is being unfairly judged based on draft position.
FWIW i would give him a role to play in the midfield every game for the rest of the year, and if he comes on excellent and if he doesnt we cut our losses and look for another opportunity for him, we should be able to get an early second round pick, or potentially say Geelongs first for a swap of our 2nd, which might help us land Papley or Williams.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It's really poor that they haven't sorted this out yet.
The coaches obviously aren't happy about it.
I am thinking the rumours will be true and its down 5 so around 8 changes total required at a minimum.
He has shown glimpses, but so has Paddy.. Is probably more advanced and been given more opportunity. Cerra has played 13 more games than Paddy and is averaging 15.1 disposals & 0.2 goals a game v Pady 13.9 & 0.4.Cerra!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Totally agree but they are the exception to the rule. Dow for instance isn’t a problem in isolation, the thing I worry about is that we are probably hoping for half a dozen to be that exception to the rule.Some players take until 23-25 before showing anything
Some players take until 23-25 before showing anything
Tim Kelly was 23 when he played his first game.
WHo are definite outs at the end of the year?
Lang, Goddard - are there any other true cloggers on the list still?
Well that's three then, not taking into account retirements. If this were an ordinary year we'd get there on that alone.Finbar
WHo are definite outs at the end of the year?
Lang, Goddard - are there any other true cloggers on the list still?
3 - Dow
4 - LDu
5- Cerra
6 - Stephenson
7 - Hunter Clark
8 - Coffield
9 - Naughton
10 - Lachie O'brien
I remember this draft, and being super keen on LDU who is probably ended up a bigger bust than Dow.. With the exception of Naughton, none of these players are setting the world on fire.. and with McKay & Charlie Curnow its understandable why we didnt take Naughton.. I just think this is a pretty ordinary draft year and Paddy is being unfairly judged based on draft position.
FWIW i would give him a role to play in the midfield every game for the rest of the year, and if he comes on excellent and if he doesnt we cut our losses and look for another opportunity for him, we should be able to get an early second round pick, or potentially say Geelongs first for a swap of our 2nd, which might help us land Papley or Williams.
The point is that it could be a shit draft and there's no point comparing him to Walsh's draft etcI would say why does it matter that the rest of his cohort aren't playing well? Obviously your point is...we could have drafted someone else and they still wouldn't be playing very well, but that's a poor way of evaluating performance.
The question is why hasn't Dow developed to expectations and how do we get him there?
I would say why does it matter that the rest of his cohort aren't playing well? Obviously your point is...we could have drafted someone else and they still wouldn't be playing very well, but that's a poor way of evaluating performance.
The question is why hasn't Dow developed to expectations and how do we get him there?
He has shown glimpses, but so has Paddy.. Is probably more advanced and been given more opportunity. Cerra has played 13 more games than Paddy and is averaging 15.1 disposals & 0.2 goals a game v Pady 13.9 & 0.4.
Clark will be a beast. Wish we took him3 - Dow
4 - LDu
5- Cerra
6 - Stephenson
7 - Hunter Clark
8 - Coffield
9 - Naughton
10 - Lachie O'brien
I remember this draft, and being super keen on LDU who is probably ended up a bigger bust than Dow.. With the exception of Naughton, none of these players are setting the world on fire.. and with McKay & Charlie Curnow its understandable why we didnt take Naughton.. I just think this is a pretty ordinary draft year and Paddy is being unfairly judged based on draft position.
FWIW i would give him a role to play in the midfield every game for the rest of the year, and if he comes on excellent and if he doesnt we cut our losses and look for another opportunity for him, we should be able to get an early second round pick, or potentially say Geelongs first for a swap of our 2nd, which might help us land Papley or Williams.
I'm not holding my breath.
Schumacher too was a young developing kid. The only thing stopping Dow following in his footsteps is our investment in him.He's a 20 year old kid who has played some good senior footy already, but who has recently been shuffled around on the field and struggled through a few injuries.
He may not make it but at this stage he is absolutely not a bust. He's a young developing kid.
Schumacher too was a young developing kid. The only thing stopping Dow following in his footsteps is our investment in him.
Dow doesn't have the tank to play midfield, and his defensive efforts are a liability wherever we try to hide him on field.
The Lions copped the loss in value and turned Schache into Bailey, who is contributing weekly for them. We need to do the same with Dow.
Simpson, Betts, Lang, Moore, Goddard I would say are 100% gone.
50/50 would be Kruezar, Odwyer, BSOS, Polson, Owies, Kennedy - If list sizes drop i would expect all of these to go.
if not 5 definite, and I would say 3 of the others will go probably Owies, Kennedy & Polson most likely. So 8 changes, gives us a fair amount of room to use both trade and draft.
I doubt Polson will go due to a list need and BSOS I'd a long term project who the club seem bullish on. Kennedy wouldn't be delisted I don't think.
Wouldn't be surprised to see Levi go before those three if list cuts are a fact. He wouldn't be delisted or traded otherwise but with Curnow waiting in the wings might be a casualty of list cuts?
Moore would go. Simpson, Kruzer and Betts retire. Finbar, Goddard, Lang and possibly someone like McCreadie sadly.
7 changes right there.
Schumacher too was a young developing kid. The only thing stopping Dow following in his footsteps is our investment in him.
The Lions copped the loss in value and turned Schache into Bailey, who is contributing weekly for them. We need to do the same with Dow.