In fairness to Powerage, I posted these stats. He then decided other stats were more important like contested marks, marks inside 50 and shots at goal.
Obviously Todd plays a higher role as a lead up player and if we're doing everything right, he shouldn't need to take contested marks because he should be in space or dragging a defender away from another forward in space.
He doesn't take more lead up marks either.
Look I'm tired of the vitriol I am getting from you both. The stats I posted are indisputable. The fact that philthy05 would take stats posted by you to show that Marshall is good and, thinking they were posted by me, then make fun of them and say I was using them to say Marshall was bad just shows what is going on here. I could post that Marshall has flat feet and you would jump down my throat even if I produced a doctor's certificate.
The stats I posted are correct and to any sane person they indicate that Marshall has got flaws in his game and that his win ratio has as much to do with luck as it does to do with his incredible decoy skills. No matter what I say there are always other excuses, other stats which you produce that prove to you that Marshall is the man.
You have not been able to admit that one of the statistics I have produced has been relevant or correct. They are all wrong, they are all only laughworthy, even when I didn't actually post the stats. That is what is really worth a laugh.
Grow up.
Last edited: