Many dickheads do but despite this you mustn't "judge a book by its cover"...No great loss.
Be much easier if the dickheads wore a sign on their forehead before draft day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Many dickheads do but despite this you mustn't "judge a book by its cover"...No great loss.
Be much easier if the dickheads wore a sign on their forehead before draft day.
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned so here it is:Yep. The automatic stand down rule in the NRL sets a pretty high bar. Im also not sure how it works given each state sets their own penalties so there will be differences.
GBH in QLD stood down, GBH in VIC free to play. Etc.
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned so here it is:
The NRL’s CEO can use his discretion to stand down players charged with less serious criminal offences, particularly where the offence involves women and children.
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned so here it is:
The NRL’s CEO can use his discretion to stand down players charged with less serious criminal offences, particularly where the offence involves women and children.
Broad unregulated powers. Just the way the AFL wants it. I wonder how long til the AFL does the same.
Been stood down from all club commitments.
AFL: No-fault stand-down policy is not for us, says Gillon McLachlan
NoCookies | The Australian
www.theaustralian.com.au
That's a good statement from the club and definitely the right decision. I'm glad we've done it.
Been stood down from all club commitments.
It is a good decision. Just hope the lass has the appropriate supports as this will escalate his behaviour. Police should have remanded him after the second incident
stood down meaning delisted?
That's a good statement from the club and definitely the right decision. I'm glad we've done it.
He's been charged, not convicted. Sacking him now without due process would open them up to a massive claim later if he turns out to be acquitted.Just wanted to come in here and see how many of you conflated the earlier accusations made by his girlfriend and the separate incident leading to this arrest into the single incident.
You did not disappoint bigfooty.
Swans decision seems at ends with recent announcements from the AFL. Not a surprise that another sensitive issue is going to be handled on the hop by club and league. (to be clear, im not taking a position as to whether Sydneys decision is right or wrong)
He's been charged, not convicted. Sacking him now without due process would open them up to a massive claim later if he turns out to be acquitted.
They clearly went to the detail of mentioning his inability to 'follow instructions on a number of occasions previously' or words to that effect, to give themselves breathing room on even that point.
Standing him down is the only possible course of action. I'm sure if he records a conviction for this he will be officially sacked.
Just wanted to come in here and see how many of you just came here to make yourself feel better about your own club by throwing digs at the swans and other clubs that have had similar issues.
You did not disappoint bigfooty.
Swans decision seems completely logical and reasonable given this little thing in Australian criminal law called 'the presumption of innocence'. Not a surprise that another sensitive issue is going to be used to score points against opposition clubs and their supporters and/or to propose their own manifestly more sensible and intelligent ways of handling crisis situations at national sporting teams on this wonderful forum that is BigFooty
If you genuinely believe they could have feasibly maintained the 'innocent until proven guilty' position and continued on with him as an active member of the club until his trial, I have some money tied up in my late father's estate back in Nigeria you might be able to help me with.Firstly, I don't need to be told how to suck eggs regarding drawing the distinction between charged and convicted.
Secondly, the premise that it was the "only possible course of action" is incorrect. He is innocent until proven guilty. They could have equally maintained that position and continued on without standing him down. Again not discussing the merits of either choice just pointing out that there was more than one course of action.
If you genuinely believe they could have feasibly maintained the 'innocent until proven guilty' position and continued on with him as an active member of the club until his trial, I have some money tied up in my late father's estate back in Nigeria you might be able to help me with.
Again not discussing the merits of either choice just pointing out that there was more than one course of action.
to be clear, im not taking a position as to whether Sydneys decision is right or wrong
Are you even reading yours before you hit post?You don't like reading entire posts, do you?
What happened in the end with Andrew Lovett? He was charged with rape, then the charge was dropped. He was sacked the next day?He's been charged, not convicted. Sacking him now without due process would open them up to a massive claim later if he turns out to be acquitted.
They clearly went to the detail of mentioning his inability to 'follow instructions on a number of occasions previously' or words to that effect, to give themselves breathing room on even that point.
Standing him down is the only possible course of action. I'm sure if he records a conviction for this he will be officially sacked.