Relegate a couple of the vic teams to the vfl and give them the right to win into the pool of the vic based afl teams.
Worst vic based team can be relegated or something
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
This. There is no incentive for the crap Vic teams to get any better as they just get priority picks handed out, along with ridiculous free agent compo (e.g. Melbourne getting Pick #3 for James Frawley
PLAYERCARDSTART
24
James Frawley
- Age
- 35
- Ht
- 193cm
- Wt
- 96kg
- Pos.
- Def
Career
Season
Last 5
- D
- 14.2
- 4star
- K
- 9.2
- 4star
- HB
- 5.1
- 4star
- M
- 5.1
- 5star
- T
- 1.9
- 4star
- MG
- 135.4
- 2star
- D
- 8.7
- 2star
- K
- 6.0
- 2star
- HB
- 2.7
- 2star
- M
- 3.0
- 3star
- T
- 0.9
- 2star
- MG
- 135.4
- 2star
- D
- 9.0
- 3star
- K
- 4.0
- 2star
- HB
- 5.0
- 4star
- M
- 1.8
- 2star
- T
- 1.2
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
AFL should use some of their cash to invest in the VFL and make it more attractive as a TV product for those clubs' fans (replacing lost income from the current 9 games a week AFL media deal) and close the quality gap between the worst AFL teams and best VFL teams.
At present, the perennially crap Vic clubs essentially operate as propped-up second tier clubs already, with no hope of challenging for a flag any time soon, existing as minnows in an over-saturated market and dragging down the standard of the supposedly elite league. Does anyone seriously think any of North, St Kilda or Melbourne will win a flag in the next 20 years?