Recommitted Cameron Rayner [re-signed until 2023]

Remove this Banner Ad

When they win flags we allow our reserves players to look for teams where they may get games
North should be looking at Higgins. He would be in your best 10 players
Yeah all clubs do the same Constable wright Brodie Higgins like you said GWS been fantastic at it. So not just a Tiger thing.
 
Facts don't care about your feelings.

Rayner's record is no better than a player who's not best 22 at a non-finalist club.

Rayner on the left and Hannan on the right.

It is what it is despite your umbrage.



[TD valign="top"]

[TD valign="top"]
CareerStats for SeasonCareer
63Games50
5.9Kicks6.5
5.1Handballs4.6
11.0Disposals11.1
3.0Marks2.8
0.9Goals1.1
0.7Behinds0.6
2.5Tackles2.3
0Hitouts0
2.1Inside 50s2.6
0.4Goal Assists0.5
0.9Frees For0.8
0.7Frees Against0.7
4.9Contested Possessions4.8
6.3Uncontested Possessions6.6
7.5Effective Disposals7.4
68.2%Disposal Efficiency %66.7%
1.9Clangers2.0
0.5Contested Marks0.5
0.8Marks Inside 500.8
1.2Clearances0.7
0.5Rebound 50s0.1
0.9One Percenters0.9
0.2Bounces0.1
77.9Time On Ground %76.8
0.4Centre Clearances0.3
0.7Stoppage Clearances0.4
4.2Score Involvements4.5
187.5Metres Gained195.1
2.3Turnovers2.5
1.2Intercepts1.3
0.7Tackles Inside 501.0

[TD valign="top"][/TD]
[/TD]
[/TD]

The difference is that Rayner is at an age where he's still years away from even entering what should be his prime years (ages 25-29), and has the scope and pedigree (being a star junior and former #1 draft pick) to still improve much further. When Hannan was Rayner's age, he was still a VAFA player.

Hannan is in the middle of what should be his prime years, appears to be going backwards and has struggled to be a first choice player in a MOR side over the past couple of seasons (15 of a possible 39 games in 2019-2020). He's probably as good as he'll ever be, and unlikely to improve much going forward. What Hannan may have done in 2017-2018 as a 23-24 year old isn't really relevant to 2021 and beyond. He's perfect delisting fodder. NFI why the Bulldogs feel he's worthy of targeting for a multi-year deal, beyond the "romance" of having played for their VFL side once upon a time. Really isn't going to add much.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The difference is that Rayner is at an age where he's still years away from even entering what should be his prime years (ages 25-29), and has the scope and pedigree (being a star junior and former #1 draft pick) to still improve much further. When Hannan was Rayner's age, he was still a VAFA player.

Hannan is in the middle of what should be his prime years, appears to be going backwards and has struggled to be a first choice player in a MOR side over the past couple of seasons (15 of a possible 39 games in 2019-2020). He's probably as good as he'll ever be, and unlikely to improve much going forward. What Hannan may have done in 2017-2018 as a 23-24 year old isn't really relevant to 2021 and beyond. He's perfect delisting fodder. NFI why the Bulldogs feel he's worthy of targeting for a multi-year deal, beyond the "romance" of having played for their VFL side once upon a time. Really isn't going to add much.
I agree with every word.
 
I just provided facts, not an opinion on the future, or why the facts have played out the way they have.

Sorry to hurt your feelings.

Where exactly did you pick up the fact that you hurt my feelings?
I agreed with you !
 
Brisbane are going to start paying other young guns their dues in coming years so rainer could comman much more money elsewhere
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top