I realise you hate existence itself so I'll clarify.
I was being satirical or joking for those hard right people who think sarcasm is for communists
Sorry, my bad. I wooshed on that one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I realise you hate existence itself so I'll clarify.
I was being satirical or joking for those hard right people who think sarcasm is for communists
We all have room for improvement, clearly my attempts at humour aren't workingSorry, my bad. I wooshed on that one.
That InDaily article mentions Stephen Trigg was asked about his interest in Chairman. Wow if true.
On SM-A205YN using BigFooty.com mobile app
I have no doubt that would be true, the AFC Board/Chapman are so out of touch, they all think they are doing a such wonderful job.
And Stephen was such a trooper during a difficult time.
I can’t escape the feeling that Hazel was a bit of a puppet master.
I can’t escape the feeling that Hazel was a bit of a puppet master.
Olsen to review Crows' non-football ventures - and immediately begin hunt for city home - InDaily
John Olsen last Friday took charge of the Adelaide Football Club as its fifth chairman since inception in 1990.<strong> Michelangelo Rucci</strong> spoke to the man who wants the Crows measured by their football.indaily.co
Bit too soon to use past tense as I'm pretty sure he's sticking around.
well that’s Fagan done for
Hazel will disappear, either early 2021 or 2021/2, the Board has change over the last couple of years he does not have the power he once did.Bit too soon to use past tense as I'm pretty sure he's sticking around.
Conflict of interest is not the right way to put it, how about "where his heart lies".
Olsen should he pushing us to join the new AFL reserves structure instead of paying $400k per year for the "privilege" of playing in the SANFL.
This $400k would be better spend paying for our seconds to travel as part of the whole squad when we head east for matches. They can play the reserves at the same venue as the seniors.
So many more benefits than playing in a comp where we are so compromised on who can play in OUR own team, playing matches to different rules and interpretations, what jumper we can wear, how we promote ourselves etc.
Olsen won't push for the betterment of the AFC as he's still got one foot in the SANFL old boys club.
I think we'd need to subsidise our opponents travel to us as well. 30 extra people x $200 each way by 20 games is only $240k. Would think the seconds could travel and return on game day most weeks as we did to the hub this year. Even if you got caught with 1 might accom, 2 person share room at $200/night is only $60k across the season. Reckon there'd be change from $400k.
So cost is not the barrier.
Surely it is better for our reserves to get into the routine of travelling and playing under the same rules and interpretations as the seniors.
What is the downside?
Leaving a 1/2 million dollar hole in the SANFL budget.
Anything else?
That got floated out there months ago and seemed to die instantly when they say the amount of negative backlash it generated.That InDaily article mentions Stephen Trigg was asked about his interest in Chairman. Wow if true.
On SM-A205YN using BigFooty.com mobile app
I'd go further than that.Conflict of interest is not the right way to put it, how about "where his heart lies".
Olsen should he pushing us to join the new AFL reserves structure instead of paying $400k per year for the "privilege" of playing in the SANFL.
This $400k would be better spend paying for our seconds to travel as part of the whole squad when we head east for matches. They can play the reserves at the same venue as the seniors.
So many more benefits than playing in a comp where we are so compromised on who can play in OUR own team, playing matches to different rules and interpretations, what jumper we can wear, how we promote ourselves etc.
Olsen won't push for the betterment of the AFC as he's still got one foot in the SANFL old boys club.
Can I clarify, as I have come in late on this, are you suggesting that the 3 above mentioned clubs form a breakaway league with our reserves?I'd go further than that.
I'd offer to subsidise for 3 years, Norwood, Centrals and South into the new league in lieu of the $400k to the SANFL. All three will then have time to get their marketing up to scratch
We need competition here to save some travel weeks.
And unlike 1980s SA we need to be on the front foot in a national perspective.
Nope, join the Eastern AFL reserves lite.Can I clarify, as I have come in late on this, are you suggesting that the 3 above mentioned clubs form a breakaway league with our reserves?
As a Crows supporter, yes, it is a great outcome for the club.Nope, join the Eastern AFL reserves lite.
Its their choice, be in an ever weaker SANFL comp or try to be the best you can.As a Crows supporter, yes, it is a great outcome for the club.
As a Norwood supporter, absolutely not. I am not that invested in the SANFL, but I am invested in being able to watch the Legs every week, which I normally do, work permitting. If they joined this league, as you have proposed, that would be taken away. A lot of the guys that I watch them with every week have no interest in the AFL at all. Why should they have their club taken away from them to help us out?
Personally, I would rather Norwood be in a "weaker" SANFL comp and have have our club maintain its soul.Its their choice, be in an ever weaker SANFL comp or try to be the best you can.
Certainly no gun to their head.