Hately doesn't make what happened with crouch better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Hately doesn't make what happened with crouch better.
How ******* weird by the giants. What point are they trying to prove by not taking pick 40?
I'm not convinced. I hope we get him via the PSD but I wouldn't be surprised to see him play for GWS next year.
They offered Hately a 3 year deal
Yep didnt rate him lol
Wow there is some BS on this site
On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app



Log in to remove this Banner Ad
YesExcuse my ignorance, but do players nominate separately for the National Draft and the PreSeason Draft? I only ask because if he has to be in teh National Draft pool, someone (ie Port) might nab him for a junk pick!
Not sure how you work that out. They had zero leverage.They clearly weren't too fussed either way
Bulldogs gave up their first for Treloar.
I don't need to work it out. His management straight out said they couldn't be bothered.Not sure how you work that out. They had zero leverage.
Lol, thats from the "laird is practically a first rounder" train of thought.
No .. we received pick 23 for CrouchHately doesn't make what happened with crouch better.
Yes this .....but also after getting the 3 x first round picks for Cameron, they really didn't need #40They would have run out of time. Everything being done in the last minute or so and Hately wasn't their priority
Surely they could trade it for something next year, even if it’s peanuts.Yes this .....but also after getting the 3 x first round picks for Cameron, they really didn't need #40
You'd think soSurely they could trade it for something next year, even if it’s peanuts.
I doubt it will have that effect at all, most would be aware they had no need for pick 40 especially in this year with it holding virtually no value and nobody is going to trade it for a 2021 pick of any real value.And GWS have only foregone pick 40 to tell the league that unless you'll need to pay up or risk missing your man. Ok for us this year, but the at pick 40 might return dividends for the next few trade periods.
Because we haven't actually signed him yet......Amazed that people are complaining about this, we’re getting a 1st round mid for nothing. Give this kid a spot in our starting midfield rotation and let him do what he does best.
Hately for free is a better outcome than Brad CrouchHarley for nothing makes our trade period slightly better.
I'd still have it an overall negative after the Crouch situation
Because we haven't actually signed him yet......
It's not over yet mate.
The could have got Tom PhillipsI doubt it will have that effect at all, most would be aware they had no need for pick 40 especially in this year with it holding virtually no value and nobody is going to trade it for a 2021 pick of any real value.
Peanuts being the operative word, a lot of clubs will be out of this year's draft before round 3.You'd think so
Maybe GWS let him go for nothing if we threatened to take Cameron into the PSD?? They may have used is to get their 3 picks
On Pixel 3 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Because we haven't actually signed him yet......