Remove this Banner Ad

Scott Morrison - How Long? Part 3

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
He has form.


This stood out to me:
“Other allegations go back to when he was a champion debater in his university days”

Was wondering if there'd be something to link either him or Tudge to Sydney. Total sleazebags
 
This is an extremely tricky situation. So a Cabinet minister allegedly r*ped a teenage girl over thirty years ago. No one has yet revealed who the accused rapist is. The alleged victim is dead, so the allegation will never see a courtroom and will never be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. What is the government supposed to do about this? A member of the team is accused of a horrific crime but it can never be proven. Should that man be named without the chance to ever clear his name if it's not true? Should an alleged rapist be allowed to serve as a Minister of the Crown running the country and get away with a rape just because it happened a while ago and the victim is dead?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Never thought i'd be bagging a PM for heading to the beach but here we are.


Wonder what the women of Australia thought of that decision.

Exposed,is the reason why women dont report rape or abuse.
Sad, but our polititians are supposed to be leading our country,with Sco the top dog.

Instead, we see,insipid little mutts, caught in a pissing contest.

So, caught up in their slippery little bubble, they fail to understand consent and common decency,let alone integrity.

and Sco Mo ffs, cover yourself up.
 
Exposed,is the reason why women dont report rape or abuse of any said.
Sad, but our polititians are supposed to be leading our country,with Sco the top dpg.

Instead, we see,insipid little mutts, caught in a pissing contest.

So, caught up in their slippery little bubble, they fail to understand consent and common decency,let alone integrity.

and Sco Mo ffs, cover yourself up.
I'm not even talking about his physical appearance , i'm no Adonis.

At best it was TONE DEAF, at worst........
 
I'm not even talking about his physical appearance , i'm no Adonis.

At best it was TONE DEAF, at worst........
I dont give a flying fig what he or anyone else looks like.
I do care, that in one of the worst weeks in parliment, this man is flippant, he sneers when talking.

This is serious, this is not a time for a jovial family snap.

and, the only way the media were there to capture this shot, was his office leaking it.
So so not appropriate.

Friggen clueless jerk.
 
Things like this really stink when they do this but only raise jobseeker by about $3.50 a day. There are people that are 60 with no hope of being employed in today's market stuck below the poverty line.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

This is an extremely tricky situation. So a Cabinet minister allegedly r*ped a teenage girl over thirty years ago. No one has yet revealed who the accused rapist is. The alleged victim is dead, so the allegation will never see a courtroom and will never be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. What is the government supposed to do about this? A member of the team is accused of a horrific crime but it can never be proven. Should that man be named without the chance to ever clear his name if it's not true? Should an alleged rapist be allowed to serve as a Minister of the Crown running the country and get away with a rape just because it happened a while ago and the victim is dead?
I don’t think the answers to some of those questions are all that hard. People just don’t like the answers.

Whereas Shorten had the benefit of a police investigation which resulted in no charges being laid, which he said exonerated him (not strictly accurate, but it’s certainly fair to give him the benefit of the doubt), this person will never have that.

There will never be a positive finding with any credibility, whether in a Court or otherwise, that he r*ped the accuser. It just isn’t possible now. Why would he be stood down? There’s no way we will ever know whether the allegations are true and keeping in mind they are 33 years old, they have no bearing at all on the performance of his role.

You can’t require someone to stand down just because they are accused of historical wrongdoing. Once you set a standard so low, you can rest assured it will be abused. It would be one thing if there was a prospect of imminent criminal charges, but there’s no possibility of that here.

That said, I have a sneaking suspicion, given it seems to be that the accused rapist is a little bit of a lightning rod for accusations of sleazy behaviour, when the dust settles he’ll quietly be removed from his current position. Doubt it will happen right now as it will look like an acknowledgment of guilt.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Or they could do what they did and wait for an investigation. Imagine if Shorten was sacked before being found to have no case to answer?
No, the moron in chief set the standard demanding Christine Holgate step down over 4 watches before any investigation was performed.
 
Phil Coorey is to journalism what a reception with a recorder is to music.

An abomination.

Lanai Scarr is almost as bad and was clearly on deflection duty, you're there to discuss the issues, not just say on repeat its a matter for police. Meanwhile Rosie Lewis is well on her way to being your standard Murdoch drone.

Just awful all round.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top