Review Hamish 2021

Remove this Banner Ad

Ours got worse ?? Our decline can be traced to our development dropping and the whole club has imploded.
That's all true but blind Freddy can see our recruiting has been woeful too. Nicks would agree I'm sure.
 
I get it at long last. Every first round pick, no matter where taken must play round 1 every season or they are busts. Yay! Got it finally!
This comment totally misses the point!
Even after several years on our list these guys are showing nothing.
THAT is why they are busts.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

There is definitely a problem with selecting or developing midfielders. The fact is that we haven't found a half-decent one in the 8 years since Matt Crouch.

They've drafted plenty, but they either drafted the wrong ines, or screwed up their development something awful, because all we have to show for it is a field of potatoes.

I don't subscribe to Scorpus' theory about giving games to players we then sack. All Scorpus is achieving there is demonstrating a lack of understanding as to the difference between weekly team selections (which are all about short-term success) and list management (which is all about the future).

I look at the list and see it very differently. Crouch and Lever are both very good players, but they are both at other clubs now. That's not a failure of selection or development, though I will point out that neither was being developed in the last 5 years when our development problems really became chronic.
Milera & Doedee are successes. Milera is perpetually injured, but that's not a development or selection issue.
Thilthorpe, Pedlar and Cook are 1st year draftees. It's waaaaay too early to make any calls about them.

That leaves Jones, Fogarty, Gallucci, and McAsey...

All signs so far point to Fogarty being a dud selection. He was a man child, who used his size to dominate the junior ranks. That hasn't translated to the senior level, where he has no identifiable position, and still lacks the fitness and drive to impact games on a consistent basis.

Jones, i think is a failure of development. Our coaches have completely confused him, messed up his mind, and destroyed his confidence.

Gallucci, I think, was a bad selection. At least Jones showed talent before the coaches destroyed him. Gallucci never showed anything.

That leaves McAsey. I don't think that he was a selection failure. His problems are complex. Partly it's poor coaching and development. Partly it's him being forced to play at the top level before he was anywhere near ready. Partly it's Coronavirus, which played merry hell with all of our youngsters last year, with the 1st year draftees the worst affected.

So, of the 7 players who have been around long enough to make meaningful comment, only 2 appear to be draft selection failures.
 
Or our development has been rubbish, for at least the last 5 years.

How much is making the wrong selections, and how much is failing to develop them, is anyone's guess.

I lean towards development failure.

but you support developing our kids in the SANFL for 2-3 years, no matter how high they were drafted. Could it be this is a part of the problem?
 
Or our development has been rubbish, for at least the last 5 years.

How much is making the wrong selections, and how much is failing to develop them, is anyone's guess.

I lean towards development failure.

Selection is plainly a part of development, but you're right its also broader.

But you've long been an advocate of fixed immovable player rankings prioritising senior players?
 
I don't subscribe to Scorpus' theory about giving games to players we then sack. All Scorpus is achieving there is demonstrating a lack of understanding as to the difference between weekly team selections (which are all about short-term success) and list management (which is all about the future).

But that's exactly the problem. We prioritised short term success with no eye for the future and now we're paying the price
 
but you support developing our kids in the SANFL for 2-3 years, no matter how high they were drafted. Could it be this is a part of the problem?

And even now, when those players are hindered by it he just freestyles meritless excuses like it's their fault for being lazy, or they don't have a position.
 
I don't subscribe to Scorpus' theory about giving games to players we then sack. All Scorpus is achieving there is demonstrating a lack of understanding as to the difference between weekly team selections (which are all about short-term success) and list management (which is all about the future).

Fancy being this smug about making such an inane assertion.

Weekly selection has nothing to do with the playing lists future you reckon? And you're bragging about this view?
 
but you support developing our kids in the SANFL for 2-3 years, no matter how high they were drafted. Could it be this is a part of the problem?
The crux of the problem is list management which then dictates what type of player we take in the draft and the fact that we have always targetted underdeveloped players that are not ready for AFL. They targetted the underdeveloped "project" player as they have mismanaged our cap through an overvaluing of senior players and therefore feel pressure to play the aging overpaid player on the decline over a kid to justify their mismanagement. We haven't used the draft for its intended purpose and by extension haven't treated it with any respect. In saying that Ogivie's selections have been pitiful. Until our attitude on younger players changes our problems will continue.

Fix the culture by fixing list management and players won't leverage our poor culture against us in contract negotiations. Once we start to pay people their true value then we will be able to entice players to our club.
 
Last edited:
Its nonsense that we always draft players inherently less ready than other clubs.

We just demand a higher state of 'readiness' to play, which in translation just means that there are no senior players that want the spot instead. You literally have to wait through an entire generation of footballer to get in there, because we will never move these guys on or not prioritise them.

Fog has been forced to wait for Walker to decide he's pulling up stumps for four ******* years now, and it has nothing to do with performance: he's performed comparably to the elite forwards for his age and experience. Walker has only declined. We're just not willing to involve him in our game plan, or you know, play him. If he was a 50 game player by now, which he should be...
 
Selection is plainly a part of development, but you're right its also broader.

But you've long been an advocate of fixed immovable player rankings prioritising senior players?
Under normal circumstances, in years where we were contending, they would always pick the strongest possible team. That meant picking the best players, hence the concept of the pecking order. Yes, the pecking order is heavily weighted towards the more experienced players.

I have never said that it was fixed or immovable.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Under normal circumstances, in years where we were contending, they would always pick the strongest possible team. That meant picking the best players, hence the concept of the pecking order. Yes, the pecking order is heavily weighted towards the more experienced players.

I have never said that it was fixed or immovable.

Can you really not work out the problem with your claim?

You support a selection policy that skews towards experience, but claim this isnt fixed. How do you think less experienced players can overtake more experienced players if we use experience as the selection criterion?
 
Its nonsense that we always draft players inherently less ready than other clubs.

We just demand a higher state of 'readiness' to play, which in translation just means that there are no senior players that want the spot instead. You literally have to wait through an entire generation of footballer to get in there, because we will never move these guys on or not prioritise them.

Fog has been forced to wait for Walker to decide he's pulling up stumps for four ******* years now, and it has nothing to do with performance: he's performed comparably to the elite forwards for his age and experience. Walker has only declined. We're just not willing to involve him in our game plan, or you know, play him. If he was a 50 game player by now, which he should be...
Fog just isn't good enough, and probably won't win the position if/when Walker does pull up stumps.

Berg & TT appear to be easily our best tall forward options for the future.

Fog was a Hamish blunder. He's just not an AFL footballer.
 
Its nonsense that we always draft players inherently less ready than other clubs.

We just demand a higher state of 'readiness' to play, which in translation just means that there are no senior players that want the spot instead. You literally have to wait through an entire generation of footballer to get in there, because we will never move these guys on or not prioritise them.

Fog has been forced to wait for Walker to decide he's pulling up stumps for four ******* years now, and it has nothing to do with performance: he's performed comparably to the elite forwards for his age and experience. Walker has only declined. We're just not willing to involve him in our game plan, or you know, play him. If he was a 50 game player by now, which he should be...
My argument is that we don't really want the drafted player to replace the contracted experienced declining player. Because they have overextended our cap this means that there is no place for the drafted player as it makes the decision-makers look bad having the highly paid experienced player sitting in the two's. The problem is that we can't move experienced declining players on to save ourselves and the younger players are the one's who suffer. Therefore the club subconsciously believes there is less urgency in nailing the pick for a player who is ready to play and is ready to impact instantly. All comes down to an overvaluing of our list and an undervaluing of what we can get out of the draft. The other thing the club doesn't understand is that by moving players out with value you attract players in. Our attitude is completely wrong.

Our problems aren't going to be solved solely through the draft. We must start to attract decent players in through the trade.
 
Last edited:
Fog just isn't good enough, and probably won't win the position if/when Walker does pull up stumps.

Berg & TT appear to be easily our best tall forward options for the future.

Fog was a Hamish blunder. He's just not an AFL footballer.

Oh ok, well if you say so

We'll wipe the footage of him performing at AFL level.
 
I'm concerned about Fog. But let's be honest we aren't playing him enough in the spot he is likely to make it

His size isn't that different to other successful KP forwards

And more particularly, giving him the role and the game plan status necessary. He needs to be a leading forward, and he needs to be targeted.

Picking a guy with his skill set and making him an undefined role third tall who has to stay out of the way and who doesnt get anywhere near the targets of other players is never putting him in a position to succeed.
 
We have 4 players on the list with between 50-150 games experience.
Seed Kelly Milera & Crouch, how many A graders to build a list around there?

8 players with between 50-200 games.
Lynch Laird Brown Smith added to the above 4.

The stability selection policy has screwed the club over.
 
Fog just isn't good enough, and probably won't win the position if/when Walker does pull up stumps.

Berg & TT appear to be easily our best tall forward options for the future.

Fog was a Hamish blunder. He's just not an AFL footballer.

We don't seem to be in a hurry to pick them either.

Frampton and Lynch were preferred.
 
Excluding players in their first or second years, we have a max of 6 players we could choose from.

Milera
Doedee
Jones
McHenry
Gallucci
Fog

Milera's injured leaving a max of 5. We're playing two. Wouldnt mind betting we end up with 4 before long.

Is our issue drafting or development? I'd place more blame on development than selection over the last few years.

Also, our gameplan places too much pressure on our players. Its s**t. It screws their development.
 
None of our first round picks in the last ten years were particularly good

even the ones people mark down as wins aren’t, they’re moderately par at best

not one of our first round picks should have gone higher than they did

Exactly

Yet we persist with the same drafting and developing team during the most important times for their respective roles - a rebuild.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top