Politics Meghan Markle and Prince Harry - Racially Villified or Royally Unpopular?

[Roylion]

Revealed: police barred from searching Queen's estates for looted artefacts

Exclusive: palace and government refuse to say why exemption from 2017 law was deemed necessary

www.theguardian.com

Wonder why? Possibly a dynasty built on dispossesion and racism might have a thing or two that they're not entitled to have.

Maybe these.

That they refuse to even consider doing the right thing or being accountable speaks volumes on how out of touch they are.

Yep. What looted artefacts are we looking for again?

 

[Chief]

Maybe these.

View attachment 1086206View attachment 1086207View attachment 1086208



Yep. What looted artefacts are we looking for again?

They only have to look at the British Museum for those.

Leave Brenda alone!

 

[Bareth Garry]

On one hand I can't believe they actually poll this family over in Britain but on the other hand just looking at the numbers it is very obvious the monarchy is in for a deep reckoning. The generational gap between pro-Harry/Meghan and anti-Harry/Meghan is stark and once this Queen passes they're in real trouble because the next in line are more unpopular across the board than her.

 

[Leeda]

They only have to look at the British Museum for those.

Leave Brenda alone!

no .. shortly and shorty and hag we alll swipe.. left..

 

[Roylion]

On one hand I can't believe they actually poll this family over in Britain but on the other hand just looking at the numbers it is very obvious the monarchy is in for a deep reckoning.

How so? Republic?

The generational gap between pro-Harry/Meghan and anti-Harry/Meghan is stark and once this Queen passes they're in real trouble

In real trouble in terms of what?

because the next in line are more unpopular across the board than her.

So? What does this mean exactly?

Yet the next Duke of Cornwall and Prince of Wales is supposed to be the most 'popular' royal.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1394935/prince-william-news-most-popular-royal-family-poll-meghan-markle-harry-andrew-queen

 

[Pessimistic]

I’m well aware of that. However if you offer those opinions on a public discussion forum do you not expect to be questioned by people who might hold a different opinion?

saying Charles brand is damaged is like saying the sky is blue. Do you want me to explain that too? (I’m aware the sky may not be blue)

 

[Roylion]

saying Charles brand is damaged is like saying the sky is blue. Do you want me to explain that too?

Please do. I await your explanation.

 

[Pessimistic]

Please do. I await your explanation.

‘nothing says I have to. But it’s only blue (sky) in our eyes, the sky has no colour. A bit like your rose coloured perception of charles

yes we can participate in discussion, but you can’t badger someone to discuss to your ‘rules.

any way I won’t, surprised you haven’t twigged that

 

[Roylion]

‘nothing says I have to.

Please yourself. You offered. Didn't you say "Do you want me to explain that too?"

I said "Please do. I await your explanation."

any way I won’t, surprised you haven’t twigged that

Of course you won't.

You mean, you can't. Up to you.

 

[Pessimistic]

Please yourself. You offered. Didn't you say "Do you want me to explain that too?"

I said "Please do. I await your explanation."




Of course you won't.

You mean, you can't. Please yourself.

i did, you removed that bit from the quoted bit, but of course you always do. I perceive you are pretty pleased with yourself on the whole.

 

[Roylion]

i did

Sure you did. Explain it again how Charles is "damaged."

 

[Pessimistic]

Sure you did. Explain it again how Charles is "damaged."

I explained why the sky ain’t necessarily blue. You picked that bit and said I offered to explain, so I did.(explain)

 

[Roylion]

I explained why the sky ain’t necessarily blue. You picked that bit and said I offered to explain, so I did.(explain)

Explain it again how Charles is "damaged."

 

[Pessimistic]

Please yourself. You offered. Didn't you say "Do you want me to explain that too?"

I said "Please do. I await your explanation."




Of course you won't.

You mean, you can't. Up to you.

‘in case your attention span is waning

 

[Pessimistic]

saying Charles brand is damaged is like saying the sky is blue. Do you want me to explain that too? (I’m aware the sky may not be blue)

‘the bit you picked on. It’s pretty clear

 

[Pessimistic]

Anyway, sorry to be annoying to you RoYlion. This happy snap might help

 

[Roylion]

Anyway, sorry to be annoying to you RoYlion. This happy snap might helpView attachment 1086760

So tell me again how Charles is 'damaged' and 'toxic'.

 

[Pessimistic]

So tell me again how Charles is 'damaged' and 'toxic'.

youve actually post it several times more than me

 

[Roylion]

youve actually post it several times more than me

That's what happens when you don't provide an answer to a repeated question.

 

[Pessimistic]

That's what happens when you don't provide an answer to a repeated question.

be my guest

 

[Leeda]

So tell me again how Charles is 'damaged' and 'toxic'.

am liking your stand... no need to vilify anyone .. but got some wracking great ideas of the current nut job...

 

[Chief]

NFI why it posts sideways. Oh well.

 

[The Cryptkeeper]

Would it have hurt Markle just this once to keep her self-serving mouth shut and not issue a press release explaining her absence from the Duke of Edinburgh's funeral?

If there is one person that nobody wants to hear from right now it is this ruthless, opportunistic social climber.

I can't cop Piers Morgan but on this one he is 150% correct. The Oprah interview was nothing more than a publicity stunt full of outright lies and half-truths.

 

[owen87]

View attachment 1102372
NFI why it posts sideways. Oh well.

This is literally your website. I refuse to turn my head if you won't make it upright!

 

[Leeda]

View attachment 1102372
NFI why it posts sideways. Oh well.

dude... sideways is always a bad ways...