He hurt himself just where I was sitting, didn't look much in it
Yeah, didn't look like much but I read somewhere that they were looking at a crack in the jaw
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He hurt himself just where I was sitting, didn't look much in it
Awfulthe music between the goals at Marvel... what do we all think about that?
Melbourne had some important players out also, can't use injuries as an excuse for this one.So it seems most people reckon we played very poorly, yet we only lost by 3 goals.
Even playing half decently AND with same team I reckon would have beaten Melbourne.
Add a ruckman, another key forward and Crouch and we thrash team.
Chin up maties!!!!
View attachment 1088694Melbourne’s efficiency numbers. That’s an astronomical number, hopefully finally this sets off alarm bells and we get our defence sorted. This wasn’t as close as the score suggested.
No one mentioning it, but I wonder if our defence is missing Gears. Just his organisation and leadership. And his example and desperation. We seemed to lack structure and I’m sure he helps us with his experience and knowledge.
He may not be our best player, and he cops some stick in here. But his voice on the field seems missed.
100 point loss . If you are going to go for ridiculous hypertheticals why not say a 1000 point loss?
We were flattered by the scoreboard no doubt. I reckon we should have been beaten by twice the amount, but 100 point?
So we play a team with a better forward setup. So what? Another hypothetical, a different game, and we play better and dont let their forwards dominate.
You could do hypothicals about any team. Fact is we lost by 3 goals and probably should of been more, but you reckon 15 more?
Having a laugh surely.
If you’re referring to the Gresham goal in the last with ten minutes left I wouldn’t call that a junk time goal. We were still in it at that point.They had our measure across the ground except in front of goal. Petracca and Fritsch missed a heap of easy conversions. Those two alone missed 6 goals and 12.19 to 11.7 suggests that had they could have won 19.12.126 to 7.11.53 without to much imagination....that's only 73 points but it's not hard to imagine that had they converted a bit more accurately they would have snuffed us and gained more momentum. We kicked a few junk time goals when the game was already over too. The way we played didn't look anywhere near them.
They had our measure across the ground except in front of goal. Petracca and Fritsch missed a heap of easy conversions. Those two alone missed 6 goals and 12.19 to 11.7 suggests that had they could have won 19.12.126 to 7.11.53 without to much imagination....that's only 73 points but it's not hard to imagine that had they converted a bit more accurately they would have snuffed us and gained more momentum. We kicked a few junk time goals when the game was already over too. The way we played didn't look anywhere near them.
I actually wish the dees had have kicked straighter to put the loss in perspective. I wouldn't say 100 points... but 50-70 easily. We were a shambles.
To play so badly and get beaten by only three goals tells me our backline stood up.
It tells me Melbourne missed shots on goal.
So what, every team missed shots at goals. you actively wanted the Saints to lose by ten goals. Nice type of supporter. Goodbye
You wish our percentage was worse? Serious?I actually wish the dees had have kicked straighter to put the loss in perspective. I wouldn't say 100 points... but 50-70 easily. We were a shambles.
It tells me Melbourne missed shots on goal.
You wish our percentage was worse? Serious?