It was all half arsedWell the rebuild has been a complete and utter failure then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was all half arsedWell the rebuild has been a complete and utter failure then.
Probs, but we've got rid of a lot of staff too.Well the rebuild has been a complete and utter failure then.
I am interested in these comments.It was all half arsed
I am interested in these comments.
What does a successful rebuild look like?
The best clubs don't seem to rebuild these days.
Successful clubs are always building for the future. Draft picks are irrelevant and they have a good enough culture to back their development in even though they may not recruit high draft picks. We currently don’t have this.I am interested in these comments.
What does a successful rebuild look like? Who has performed one over the last 20 years? What were its characteristics?
We definitely messed up with the Hogan trade and it has cost us, but I don't know if that means we did the rebuild wrong.
The best clubs don't seem to rebuild these days.
So out of interest, how do we approach this years draft? Desperate for another forward and another ruck. Preferably with some agility.
So 3 skinny flankers it isA KPF, then a KPF, and when in doubt a KPF
Look we tell the AFL he’s had severe concussion problems, and threaten future legal action for ongoing post-concussion syndrome and we’re good to go.We could give it a go but not sure the umps would allow the helmet
So out of interest, how do we approach this years draft? Desperate for another forward and another ruck. Preferably with some agility.
Not under pressure it isn't. Gws were witches hats. Carlton hadn't played for 10 days and were jumping out of their skins and saw a young inexperienced midfield and squashed us.The thing that worries me is Lachie Schultz in the pre season games said that we were miles ahead of where we were last year in implementing the game plan and yet here we are. Is the game plan already irrelevant because this is of great concern.
West coast were desperate to get O’Driscoll. The Age reported a few days later that they called Collingwood at pick 26 offering next years second rounder for their pick 27 to get him. That was the reason why we had to pay pick 30 and next years third rounder to jump to 27 for Noddy.Wish we just took Neale in the draft instead of trading up for O’Driscoll
Well when we played against a no-pressure GWS the ball movement looked good.The thing that worries me is Lachie Schultz in the pre season games said that we were miles ahead of where we were last year in implementing the game plan and yet here we are. Is the game plan already irrelevant because this is of great concern.
Im pretty sure they were the 4th oldest team this round and we were the 4th youngestWe're certainly jumpy.
Besides the fact that rebuild's not an actual thing, I'd not be writing anything off yet. I didn't see the average age difference yesterday, but we're looking at young players to drive some very key positions. Collectively it can misfire and consistency is less likely.
Also I've not seen as much scrutiny and advice thrown at one side 2 games in, it was a lot of fuel for the cartoon coaching group.
For me it's a small sample size as far as this year goes.
The onus was on Cerra to stop Walsh or at least demand more of the ball, he failed and moving Conca out of defense wouldn't have helped the result.I understand your reasoning about Blakely and I agree about the kids versus bigger bodies being a key fundamental point in yesterdays loss but I think one of the things is that looking again at the team and I thought we had the right mix of players available in the team - I disagree there was nothing we could have done on the day.
One of the things I struggle with is (regardless of Blakely in or out) we already had/have Acres (and to a lesser extent Aish and Conca, although he is just an experienced body not large) in the side; why was he not able to use his relative position of experience and significant size (comparable to Cripps) to address that issue as it arose? surely that has to be one of the key strengths he brings to the team? And I don't think it is just a case of him not performing but also not being played in the best position for the game situation; why would we not have moved him into the centre square if a guy like Cripps is bashing up our younger midfielders in that area of the ground? I get that he is not talent-wise in the best four or five midfielders, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be played in the centre when the game situation calls for it.
The same goes for the use of Conca; I reckon he could have done something about Walsh; I understand that compromises the defence of Betts but that is surely a risk worth taking in that situation?
Treacy should’ve came in, and Blakely staying to take Fyfe’s spot. Colyer out. But we went with speed and got bullied inside. That’s why JLo needs to win at the selection table. What’s the use of Blakely for Peel?Umm, they are kids and Carlton are big bodies... Nothing we can do about that. Doesn't mean Brayshaw/Cerra/Serong won't be good, we are just seeing the ups and downs. Unfortunately we need another veteran mid (Tucker) in there and why I actually wanted Blakely to stay in the side, he would have bashed and crashed in there.
More likely he got ahead of himself and thought the team were ahead of where they actually are.The thing that worries me is Lachie Schultz in the pre season games said that we were miles ahead of where we were last year in implementing the game plan and yet here we are. Is the game plan already irrelevant because this is of great concern.
That’s a worry in it selfMore likely he got ahead of himself and thought the team were ahead of where they actually are.