Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I'm not saying he is doing the defensive work well. He is doing it to free up Jaegar though & you can see that working on that end but we are getting burnt the other way.No he is not. The last game we went man on man. He was assigned to Guthrie in the last and couldn't impact. The game against Richmond Worps was found out defensively quite a few times especially when taking the center bounce. JOM and shiels and the rest of our defensive structure were buggered chasing tail and filling holes. Worps is struggling. He is trying really hard to have an impact but his kicking has also gone to sh*t. I am not suggesting we trade him btw
If an opposition coach or list manager chewed on a piece of chewy for an hour and then offered it to us for TOB, I'd say take it.
Considering Worpels game has gone down dramatically since Mitchell came back into the team would it be stupid to suggest you trade Mitchell and get good currency and have a younger inside mid like Worpel for the next 10 years?
I’m not here for bait and if you don’t want an outsiders opinion just delete
Market price is never going to be right for those on that listThe question is, who do we consider are our untouchables?
Put that list together.
Anyone not on it is tradeable.
Just a matter of if there is a market and if the price is right.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The question is, who do we consider are our untouchables?
Put that list together.
Anyone not on it is tradeable.
Just a matter of if there is a market and if the price is right.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actual list of untouchables under the age of 30?
- W.Day
- B.Hardwick
- J.Sicily
- J.Impey
- C.Jiath
- J.Scrimshaw
- C.Wingard
- M.Lewis
Those who are young or still have something to prove but could be on the list above by the end of the year/unlikely to be considered for trade this year:
- All 2020 draftees (D.Grainger-Barass, C.Downie, etc)
- F.Maginess
- E.Jeka
- J.Koshitske
- N.Reeves
- D.Greaves
- D.Moore
- H.Morrison
I think everyone else is fair game.
Whatever the list of untouchables is, it probably includes all the players who are actually worth trading.
Ceglar
Brisbane (fragile ruck division)Definitely. But doubt anyone would take him.
Brisbane (fragile ruck division)
Dogs (Martin might have another year, they like the 2 ruck dynamic with English)
Gold Coast (they have 1 ruck outside of Witts)
St Kilda (Ryder last year, Hunter not AFL Standard, Marshall more ruck/fwd)
If anyone of those teams would do it for a third/fourth rounder then I'll drive him over myself.
No but part of a list rebuilding is also identifying list spots that provide greater value depending on who takes the spot, and having Ceglar on the list rather then a player like Walsh or Heath who have genuine future promise and youth on their side, and Ceglar is also taking up cap spaceWhat would be the point, though? If the club doesn't like the way he plays, they can just drop him, which they've shown very little interest in doing thus far. Even then, he'd still likely be more useful as a back-up option who at least knows the game plan already.
If you want to trade your way to a better list in the medium term, you need to make actual sacrifices. And a lot supporters - and maybe even some players - are just not going to be able to cope with the kind of names that would need to be given up to get they kinds of players the club needs.
No but part of a list rebuilding is also identifying list spots that provide greater value depending on who takes the spot, and having Ceglar on the list rather then a player like Walsh or Heath who have genuine future promise and youth on their side, and Ceglar is also taking up cap space