Game Day Round 4 Matchday Discussion

[Raveneyes]

6/521 (or 6/645 if I take Ridley C)
Lloyd
Ridley (VC)
Cox
Warner
Gulden
Campbell

4/6 rookies played, just Jordon and Berry remaining.

 

[hoddo]

Merrett scaled down 9 points and Lloyd scaled down 6 point. Not happy!

 

[Scythe94]

Bring Lloyd in for the first time in two years, has only his third sub-100 in that time. To be expected

 

[OnlyPowerForever]

4/303
Lloyd Warner Gulden Campbell
Have to put it in context of 1 premo 3 rookies, pretty decent.
Campbell I had on field over Jones and Brockman so that's fine.

Context is something those SC projected scores don't have.

SC forecast tonight had my H2H at 6/585 vs 3/318.
My H2H forecast was at 6/504 (D1, D2, M6, M7, R2, F5) vs 3/263.
Actual scores: 6/507 v 3/273.

 

[Hai_Newman]

Happy I left Campbell on the pine. Jordon to beat 49... should be okay.

Very happy with Heppell. Good hold. Reckon he averages high 80s.

Paddy Wow and Shampells most hyped rooks for the season so far.

Impey pick over him for 20k looking the goods.

Nice to see new rook Waterman out score him for a fraction of the coin.

 

[rocker_oz33]

No love for the gull from CD flogs

 

[mochacinolatte]

No love for the gull from CD flogs

They better put all these points into the Great Texan.

 

[pulpdriver]

They better put all these points into the Great Texan.

They will all go to Bont.

 

[Sherman41]

Happy enough with the night.

cox (looped, got to hope Highmore or Kosi don’t play, worst case hold young to get it.)

Gulden could of went 80+ easily

Warner faded But delivering every week.

Campbell ( looped, can either field Rowe or Dow hmmm)

 

[Raveneyes]

They better put all these points into the Great Texan.

They will all go to Bont.

Dusty is owed, and is calling it in. Expect some big KOTD action tomorrow night.

 

[Nelso]

Context is something those SC projected scores don't have.

SC forecast tonight had my H2H at 6/585 vs 3/318.
My H2H forecast was at 6/504 (D1, D2, M6, M7, R2, F5) vs 3/263.
Actual scores: 6/507 v 3/273.

When are people going to learn not to take notice of projected scores

 

[pulpdriver]

Dusty is owed, and is calling it in. Expect some big KOTD action tomorrow night.

Yeah, that'll be fine by me.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

You know that's not how the scoring system works though.

Yes but thats the arguement.

Mills mattered more than Lloyd to their win and definitly more than Ridley to his teams loss but gets less recognition because he did all his work in the first three quarters before a mathematical equasion could work its way past counting to 2?
Weighting/scaling is all wrong this year and has only been getting worse.

Best example is Gawn.
Best ruck to ever play the game of AFL. NO
Best ruck to ever play SC. Yep.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

I still wanna know how the fu** Watermelon went from 70 to 56

Algorithinmfhjsdfg sbro

 

[OnlyPowerForever]

That's probably true. There's been a few games where we've known the total has reached 3300 with a few minutes to go and we've seen points taken from players who aren't touching the ball to get points for the ones who are.

It's crap, because it impacts players purely on the time, not on the effectiveness.

I'd personally change scaling in these situations by changing the weightings based on their importance on the game.
So high-scoring games, drop the weighting for goals only incrementally through the game.
Wet, high tackling grind? Drop the weighting for tackles only.

Similarly, for games with low stats where 3300 isn't going to be reached, increase weightings accordingly.
Low-scoring game, increase weighting per goal only

 

[mochacinolatte]

They will all go to Bont.

 

[pulpdriver]

I understand he's on the losing side but being stripped of 10 points is pretty ******* galling. That's just not right.

 

[OnlyPowerForever]

When are people going to learn not to take notice of projected scores

I take notice of my model - just pointing out SC's joke.

 

[Vacuous Space]

Best ruck to ever play SC. Yep.

Dean Cox invented Max Gawn.

 

[Raveneyes]

Yes but thats the arguement.

Mills mattered more than Lloyd to their win and definitly more than Ridley to his teams loss but gets less recognition because he did all his work in the first three quarters before a mathematical equasion could work its way past counting to 2?
Weighting/scaling is all wrong this year and has only been getting worse.

Best example is Gawn.
Best ruck to ever play the game of AFL. NO
Best ruck to ever play SC. Yep.

Ziebell was the BOG last week for Norf. He stopped the Doggies from flogging them by 186 points, holding them to only a paltry 128 point win.

 

[ivabiggin]

who is or was a better player alan jackovich or buddy

 

[mochacinolatte]

When are people going to learn not to take notice of projected scores

Yeah Tex projected 101 is pretty conservative. Should be 202 imo.

 

[THECHIEFTON]

Yes but thats the arguement.

Mills mattered more than Lloyd to their win and definitly more than Ridley to his teams loss but gets less recognition because he did all his work in the first three quarters before a mathematical equasion could work its way past counting to 2?
Weighting/scaling is all wrong this year and has only been getting worse.

Best example is Gawn.
Best ruck to ever play the game of AFL. NO
Best ruck to ever play SC. Yep.

Don't disagree it gives me the shits to. Even more considering this year I started 5 600k plus mids and bugger all chip scabs!

 

[TheRednWhite]

3/258 - Zerrett, Gulden, Warner

Zerrett very poor, expect more from my uber premo. Horrible starting pick in SC, his scores are just not cutting the mustard for me.

Gulden poor but forgive.

Warner great

Not going to take Campbell (E) score, he was atrocious tonight. Expect him to get "rested" next week.

Very under par start to the round. Not having Riddles in my team is torture, need to get him ASAP even before I get Lloyd

 

[mochacinolatte]

They need to nerf this kick-in points. Give more points to Goal Kickers I say!