That is what they do...
Point out the holes in Taylor's arguments?
You're right, I do do that quite often
Seems my concerns were valid.
By all means mate, explain to us plebs the point being made.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is what they do...
Seems my concerns were valid.
I did but I assume you'd drop that in the Biden or aftermath thread. Also sounds like some sort of Fox News torturing of the truth.Did anyone care to notice the part where I told you about the person third in line to the presidency using her position to profit multiple times just this year?
To me, it is a massive problem with their political class. It was a problem when Purdue and the other Georgia lady did it, it's a problem when Pelosi did it.I did but I assume you'd drop that in the Biden or aftermath thread. Also sounds like some sort of Fox News torturing of the truth.
Did anyone care to notice the part where I told you about the person third in line to the presidency using her position to profit multiple times just this year?
It's the result of years of *******tery from Trumpies. Happy to read about it in the appropriate thread.
Ultimately if the politicians don't have integrity then it doesn't really matter if the election does, does it?
Can you appreciate the link between the stuff I was posting about the NRA influencing elections with direct interactions, political corruptions and this subject?
Back to those armies of political operators electioneering and giving out gifts in polling lines, please.
Can you appreciate the link between the stuff I was posting about the NRA influencing elections with direct interactions, political corruptions and this subject?
Or do I need to slow down?
You didn't post that. You posted a Salon link about MAGA enthusiasts strutting round with guns and intimidating voters, while making vague unreferenced claims about the NRA.
Post a link on the NRA stuff and I'll read it. I look forward to the part where people were happy to flip their vote for a bottle of water and mars bar, its about all the NRA can afford these days I guess.
Found it.
The NRA Has Paid Millions to a Firm Tied to Shady Election Practices
A consulting operation that's been tied to allegedly illegal campaign tactics by the RNC in Nevada and Montana is running the gun group's get-out-the-vote effort in at least 16 states.www.thetrace.org
This is scraping the surface of groups who directly influence elections.
Except this is already illegal, and nobody has said it shouldn't be illegal.Found it.
The NRA Has Paid Millions to a Firm Tied to Shady Election Practices
A consulting operation that's been tied to allegedly illegal campaign tactics by the RNC in Nevada and Montana is running the gun group's get-out-the-vote effort in at least 16 states.www.thetrace.org
This is scraping the surface of groups who directly influence elections.
Outside of the Dems wanting to make it easier to vote, what "vehicle" are the Dems pushing with this?I don't think so. It's a vehicle for the issue. In all respects.
I went and looked into this, and it appears that this is misleading. Microsoft has been going up generally and lots of people have got on. The share price didn't jump in response to the government contract, which although a big number is less than 2% of annual revenue for Microsoft. So the market didn't move in react to this news.Did anyone care to notice the part where I told you about the person third in line to the presidency using her position to profit multiple times just this year?
The share price has gone up 10% in the two weeks since the deal was announced, I'm assuming the speaker of the house is briefed on government spending.I went and looked into this, and it appears that this is misleading. Microsoft has been going up generally and lots of people have got on. The share price didn't jump in response to the government contract, which although a big number is less than 2% of annual revenue for Microsoft. So the market didn't move in react to this news.
So unless you can show that they somehow benefited from inside knowledge, this appears to be false/fake outrage. Not at all the same as what happened with the Republican senators.
The share price has been going up all year. You're trying to claim that 2 weeks of improvement were down to a single announcement shows a significant lack of understanding of what happens. If the deal was a major event, the share price would have jumped.The share price has gone up 10% in the two weeks since the deal was announced, I'm assuming the speaker of the house is briefed on government spending.
Take a look at her buying of Tesla before the US government issued a directive to go electric too.
Is +10% higher or lower than the rest of the market between 30th March and 16th April?The share price has been going up all year. You're trying to claim that 2 weeks of improvement were down to a single announcement shows a significant lack of understanding of what happens. If the deal was a major event, the share price would have jumped.
The NASDAQ has gone up 8% since 30 March.Is +10% higher or lower than the rest of the market between 30th March and 16th April?
Correlation or causation?So this contract that is worth 2% of the yearly has boosted them 2% above the average of the rest of the market.
Interesting.
Are we looking for a reason that a person in a position of influence and privileged information buying into a company about to benefit from government decisions is not a big deal?Correlation or causation?
What their competitors do in that time? How much did Google grow in that time? Apple? Amazon? IBM? Cisco? Oracle? VMWare?
I don't know any of this, but it's probably a broader view of the market than just a big government contract.