Way to miss the point.This is a shocking post. So because of where a player was rated when he was 18, that means they're no good? If you did a redraft of Laird's draft do you think he goes closer to the top 10 or does he stay as a rookie? Who cares where they were taken, this just shows how well we've drafted/traded for these players.
We lost due to bombing it long I50 to players who can't take contested marks to save their life (with Tex injured today) compared to their I50 entries which were hitting up open players all over the zone. Our mids didn't play well today and their mids did, but I think it's a stretch to say that it's because our players were drafted with late picks.
The point is that we have not invested enough of our top end resources into the most important part of the ground.
Laird makes the point well. He's ok as a mid but his kicking is trash. Hence all the long bombing F50 entries you complain about. We don't have any mids with really good skills.