Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is still an insane waste of money. Building a massive stadium and then taking most of it a part is a massive waste of money. Do people understand how much it costs to build stadiums? It costs serious money to tear them down too. And brisbane has no need for a 25 thousand capacity athletics track. none. our current Athletics track is fine for year to year activities. It never suffers crowd lockouts. If we ever got another one off special athletics event we could just use the gabba or metricon again. Even a 25 thousand capacity athletics track is a white elephant thst would sit empty all the time.Not if they follow the original London Olympic Stadium model.
That stadium was designed to be taken apart and reduced from 3 or 4 tiered 80k stadium, to a permanent 1 tier /base tier 25k stadium and become the national home of UK Athletics / British Athletics.
But several organisations wanted to keep it as a major stadium and West Ham United took out a long term lease and made it the club's new 60k home base moving from their 36k Upton Park home after it was redeveloped but before London hosted the 2017 IAAF World Championships. Seats are moved back and forth to use the athletics track and for seats to be close to the soccer pitch at ground level.
There are 2 stadium in Qatar that will be dismantled after the world cup and parts of each ones will be donated to African nations.
So Brisbane could build a 60k-70k stadium near the airport, and bid for the 2027, or 2029, or 2031, or 2033, or 2035 IAAF World championships build a new athletics stadium, that can be reduced to 20k ie keep the lower tier seating/stand, after it has hosted the Olympics and athletics world championship.
It then becomes a legacy building and facilities for athletics and other sports just like the old 1982 Commonwealth Games site at Mt Gravatt which became the Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre in 2003 and regularly hosts the national athletic championships. They still have about 35,000 or so temporary aluminium seat stands as well as 2 grandstands with about 15,000 seats.
Sell that land to help fund part of the new stadium and all the sports out at Mt Gravatt get new facilities after the stadium is reduced to 20k.
What if the money for new stadium and demolishing costs was picked up by the IOC?! Ie consider it part of their money with govt money being considered to be built on legacy stuff like upgrades to transport and other facilities?That is still an insane waste of money. Building a massive stadium and then taking most of it a part is a massive waste of money. Do people understand how much it costs to build stadiums? It costs serious money to tear them down too. And brisbane has no need for a 25 thousand capacity athletics track. none. our current Athletics track is fine for year to year activities. It never suffers crowd lockouts. If we ever got another one off special athletics event we could just use the gabba or metricon again. Even a 25 thousand capacity athletics track is a white elephant thst would sit empty all the time.
the gabba is in the best location. Its due for an upgrade over the next decade anyway. this should happen regardless of their being an olympics. Just increase its capacity to 65 thousand. You only have to build half a stadium that way. By the 2030s brisbane will have the population to fill this stadium for big footy events, cricket and concerts. So no need to waste money reducing its capacity either.
the olympics transport infrastructure requirements will also be greatly reduced if the main stadium is the gabba. Many people can just walk from southbank and the city. Plus the city tunnel will have just been completed linking the gabba to the city. You will need to build all this again if the stadium is in a suburb near the airport and it wont be used anywhere near capacity after the olympics are gone. More white elephants.
stadiums built in outer suburbs or near airports always fail. Stadiums built for one or two special events and then have no real purpose always fail. The queensland olympic committe has claimed they dont want white elephants but are planning on building exactly that.
Have you been to the Gabba?That is still an insane waste of money. Building a massive stadium and then taking most of it a part is a massive waste of money. Do people understand how much it costs to build stadiums? It costs serious money to tear them down too. And brisbane has no need for a 25 thousand capacity athletics track. none. our current Athletics track is fine for year to year activities. It never suffers crowd lockouts. If we ever got another one off special athletics event we could just use the gabba or metricon again. Even a 25 thousand capacity athletics track is a white elephant thst would sit empty all the time.
the gabba is in the best location. Its due for an upgrade over the next decade anyway. this should happen regardless of their being an olympics. Just increase its capacity to 65 thousand. You only have to build half a stadium that way. By the 2030s brisbane will have the population to fill this stadium for big footy events, cricket and concerts. So no need to waste money reducing its capacity either.
the olympics transport infrastructure requirements will also be greatly reduced if the main stadium is the gabba. Many people can just walk from southbank and the city. Plus the city tunnel will have just been completed linking the gabba to the city. You will need to build all this again if the stadium is in a suburb near the airport and it wont be used anywhere near capacity after the olympics are gone. More white elephants.
stadiums built in outer suburbs or near airports always fail. Stadiums built for one or two special events and then have no real purpose always fail. The queensland olympic committe has claimed they dont want white elephants but are planning on building exactly that.
You say the Gabba is the best location but it is in a very tricky location that restricts redevelopment.That is still an insane waste of money. Building a massive stadium and then taking most of it a part is a massive waste of money. Do people understand how much it costs to build stadiums? It costs serious money to tear them down too. And brisbane has no need for a 25 thousand capacity athletics track. none. our current Athletics track is fine for year to year activities. It never suffers crowd lockouts. If we ever got another one off special athletics event we could just use the gabba or metricon again. Even a 25 thousand capacity athletics track is a white elephant thst would sit empty all the time.
the gabba is in the best location. Its due for an upgrade over the next decade anyway. this should happen regardless of their being an olympics. Just increase its capacity to 65 thousand. You only have to build half a stadium that way. By the 2030s brisbane will have the population to fill this stadium for big footy events, cricket and concerts. So no need to waste money reducing its capacity either.
the olympics transport infrastructure requirements will also be greatly reduced if the main stadium is the gabba. Many people can just walk from southbank and the city. Plus the city tunnel will have just been completed linking the gabba to the city. You will need to build all this again if the stadium is in a suburb near the airport and it wont be used anywhere near capacity after the olympics are gone. More white elephants.
stadiums built in outer suburbs or near airports always fail. Stadiums built for one or two special events and then have no real purpose always fail. The queensland olympic committe has claimed they dont want white elephants but are planning on building exactly that.
It would still be money wasted just not ours. Im fine from that as a queenslander. Although as a queenslander it wouod still be a wasted opportunity to not have the stadium built in a prime location.What if the money for new stadium and demolishing costs was picked up by the IOC?! Ie consider it part of their money with govt money being considered to be built on legacy stuff like upgrades to transport and other facilities?
Thats now. But not in 2030. Its going to become the central train hub along with city once cross river rail is completed. This will also involve huge public spaces just outside the gabba along with restaurants and pubs. Plus its also walking distance from southbank. Its almost like cross river rail was planned for an olympic bid.You say the Gabba is the best location but it is in a very tricky location that restricts redevelopment.
There is a heap of room on the western side to expand. Just a couple of crappy old low level buildings on that side. Can more than justify getting rid of them for an olympics. I think they might be doing that anyway. As for the wings you narrow the ground by 10-15 metres. Its too much of a circle anyway that results in unappealing afl. Plus they will want to narrow the stands width for athletics otherwise the fans will be too far from the action. That gives you heaps of room to expand to 70 thousand.Have you been to the Gabba?
Vulture St and Stanley St come right up to the edge of the stadium. You can't just put on an extra 20,000 seats without widening the base of the stadium to support it. What are you going to do? Build tunnels and have Vulture St and Stanley St buried and effectively run under the stadium so you can build the base of a bigger capacity. What is the cost of that. An insane cost??
By the way, how much is an insane cost?
I personally think the airport location is dumb. IIRC in 2016 the airport idea was for several sports venues, including Brisbane Lions moving their home base there ( before Springfield came up) and was part of the early concept for a Brisbane / SE Qld games bid. The Olympics have changed their requirements for venues since 2016.There is a heap of room on the western side to expand. Just a couple of crappy old low level buildings on that side. Can more than justify getting rid of them for an olympics. I think they might be doing that anyway. As for the wings you narrow the ground by 10-15 metres. Its too much of a circle anyway that results in unappealing afl. Plus they will want to narrow the stands width for athletics otherwise the fans will be too far from the action. That gives you heaps of room to expand to 70 thousand.
ps. An insane amount is any 40 plus thousand stadium that isnt then used for 30 plus years with close to capacity events atleast 6 times every year.
Announced today that it will be the Gabba. Some sanity prevails. Going to rebuild the whole stadium and expand it to only 50 thousand. by 2030 the Gabba really needs to hold 60 thousand regardless of an olympics or not.I personally think the airport location is dumb. IIRC in 2016 the airport idea was for several sports venues, including Brisbane Lions moving their home base there ( before Springfield came up) and was part of the early concept for a Brisbane / SE Qld games bid. The Olympics have changed their requirements for venues since 2016.
But another decent greenfield site has to be seriously be considered.
The Gabba was expanded to match the size of of the MCG and be approx 160m x 140m boundary line to boundary line and run east-west. which means for cricket the straight north-south boundaries are 60m from wicket to wicket.
The ICC has put minimum sizes for grounds. If you take take away 10-15 on the wings the the ICC might not approve the Gabba for Tests and ODI's, unless they grandfather the Gabba.
The fans had no problem watching athletics at the MCG for the Comm Games. Sure having a stadium about 120m wide for athletics on the side is better than 140-150m but you can add or remove a few rows of seats just for the games. I think the city end of the MCG they took out 5 rows of seats so that the track could fit as the MCG fence to fence is 170m but the track from outside of lane 8 at one end to outside of lane 8 at another is 177.8m.
So there is a good chance that's reducing the wings is not going to happen. Sure you could build a huge 25,000 people type stand at the western end and maybe its temporary but that will probably add only 17,000 seats. Something else would have to be done of a temporary nature to get it over 60,000 to say 65,000 so that you can sell 60,000 seats allowing for space taken up by necessary infrastructure.
Since 1960 Olympics (and even pre 1956) the host city has faced the issue that the athletics stadium is an oval and has to be a minimum of 180m x 120m, but the most popular local sport that makes the venue viable has been a rectangle sport. So there has been a degree of inefficiency and waste at every stadium. That probably won't change with Brisbane.
Even in Atlanta where baseball rather than gridiron used the Olympic stadium post Olympic games, Ted Turner and NBC had to come up with around $200mUSD to knock down about 1/3rd of the stadium and transform it into a baseball stadium for Turner's Atlanta Braves. Capacity went from 85,000 to 50,000 But after 2016 season they moved to a new stadium, Truist Park.
View attachment 1071924 View attachment 1071927
50k capacity for the Gabba makes it hard to get tickets for the athletics. Scalped tickets will have a decent premium. Personally dont give a s**t about attending the opening and closing ceremonies.Announced today that it will be the Gabba. Some sanity prevails. Going to rebuild the whole stadium and expand it to only 50 thousand. by 2030 the Gabba really needs to hold 60 thousand regardless of an olympics or not.
40k at the Comm Games yet there were still empty grandstands50k capacity for the Gabba makes it hard to get tickets for the athletics. Scalped tickets will have a decent premium. Personally dont give a sh*t about attending the opening and closing ceremonies.
Got tickets for every evening session in Sydney and went to half the morning sessions as had other things on for the other half. With 110k capacity it was relatively easy to get a single or double ticket for every session. Only one I had trouble with was the night of Freeman's 400m final. There were 9 finals all up and it was one of the best night of Olympic or world champs finals.
Ended up lining up at 2.30am when over a week period, maybe a fortnight before the games, SOCOG released the so called 300,000 seats for the rich, the ticketing guru hid from the board at most stadiums/events and wanted to sell at a premium to corporates so SOCOG could meet its revenue budgets. I ended up sitting 5m before the finish line on level 4 for that evening of athletics. Also bought some great seats for the cycling velodrome.
As I wrote a few weeks ago, to get the Gabba to 60k or 70k would probably mean having to pinch Stanley Street and Vulture Street and using that area for the base of a larger stadium and thye would have to build a tunnel for the vehicle traffic. 50k capacity suggests that wont be happening. Seems stupid to demolish current stadium and not try and squeeze in 60k new one.
Olympics are different to Comm Games. They had 95k at most morning sessions of the Olympics at Sydney.40k at the Comm Games yet there were still empty grandstands
Agree it does seem stupid to demolish a whole stadium to only increase its capacity to 50 thousand. 70 thousand would of been ideal but surely it has to be atleast 60 thousand. If a tunnel is needed for stanley street then so be it.50k capacity for the Gabba makes it hard to get tickets for the athletics. Scalped tickets will have a decent premium. Personally dont give a sh*t about attending the opening and closing ceremonies.
Got tickets for every evening session in Sydney and went to half the morning sessions as had other things on for the other half. With 110k capacity it was relatively easy to get a single or double ticket for every session. Only one I had trouble with was the night of Freeman's 400m final. There were 9 finals all up and it was one of the best night of Olympic or world champs finals.
Ended up lining up at 2.30am when over a week period, maybe a fortnight before the games, SOCOG released the so called 300,000 seats for the rich, the ticketing guru hid from the board at most stadiums/events and wanted to sell at a premium to corporates so SOCOG could meet its revenue budgets. I ended up sitting 5m before the finish line on level 4 for that evening of athletics. Also bought some great seats for the cycling velodrome.
As I wrote a few weeks ago, to get the Gabba to 60k or 70k would probably mean having to pinch Stanley Street and Vulture Street and using that area for the base of a larger stadium and thye would have to build a tunnel for the vehicle traffic. 50k capacity suggests that wont be happening. Seems stupid to demolish current stadium and not try and squeeze in 60k new one.
You would think if they start construction after the November test say in 2027, they could complete it by March 2029. If they need say April and May the Lions could play mainly away games and say a couple at home at Metricon.Will lions play at Metricon for a couple seasons?
Not to mention somehow Annastacia Palaszczuk couldn't find time to consult the local and state members for the Gabba whl have put forth very reasonable and legitimate reasons as to why this is a terrible idea.
Or do they play through but drag the round out over the course of the Olympics?You would think if they start construction after the November test say in 2027, they could complete it by March 2029. If they need say April and May the Lions could play mainly away games and say a couple at home at Metricon.
I have no idea how much they are going to raise the stadium, otherwise they could do a staged development like at the MCG between October 2002 and October/November 2005 for the 2006 Comm Games.
They will have to play home games away in 2032, but they could say play first 6 games at home games between mid March and end of April, build the track in the month of May and test in in June and early July, for a 23rd July start of the Olympics.
Actually having the Olympics between 23rd July and 8 August raises several interesting questions. Does the AFL season end before the Olympics? Does it take a month off say between 11th July and 11th August? Do they start early to compensate for the month off? Or do they finish the home and away part of the season early and then have the finals from 3rd weekend of August??
You reckon 7 will cover both? AFL and NRL want to compete against the Olympics for crowds, eyeball and sponsors?Or do they play through but drag the round out over the course of the Olympics?
They’ve done it in the past. Just look at the CWGYou reckon 7 will cover both? AFL and NRL want to compete against the Olympics for crowds, eyeball and sponsors?
The Commonwealth Games are mickey mouse they don't rank with the Olympics. Sure they get decent media coverage but they don't absolutely dominate the media landscape like the Olympics.They’ve done it in the past. Just look at the CWG
Yeah, I know, but they're still elected representatives. I've become very disenfranchised with QLD ALP. Frequently bitch and moan about Greens targetting inner-city seats then pull s**t like against the desires of the electorate.The local and state members are both Greens and the Palaszczuk government and Greens are in a race to the death for the inner city seats.
I really can’t envisage a scenario where Palaszczuk will sit down with a local Green under any circumstances