Calm down Karen, I'm making your point for youFFS, It's got to be investigated first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Calm down Karen, I'm making your point for youFFS, It's got to be investigated first.
People are making so many assumptions here about what the police did wrong and the punishment for the bloke who took the photo not being severe enough when they actually don’t know the facts of either
Mate.If you see someone shoot someone do you need to wait for a court to find them guilty before you call them a murderer?
VICTORIA POLICE ACT 2013 - SECT 227I asked "which law did they break"
your being deliberalty obtuse but you are right.. everything is always being questioned.. and everyone is in the sight of the gun.. not even aWeak as piss. How hard would the cops go after someone if someone released photos of say, Shane Patton that he wouldn't want in the public. A 1-3k fine? You would be looking at 5 to 10 times that and probably a month in a cell.
fu** these idiots.
Any chance you can ban Kappa while you're here?VICTORIA POLICE ACT 2013 - SECT 227
Unauthorised access to, use of or disclosure of police information by members or former members of Victoria Police personnel—summary offence
(1) A member or former member of Victoria Police personnel must not, without reasonable excuse, access, use or disclose any police information if it is the duty of the member or former member not to access, make use of or disclose the information.
Penalty: 240 penalty units or imprisonment for 2 years or both.
(2) Without limiting what may be a reasonable excuse, it is a reasonable excuse if the member or former member took reasonable steps not to access, use or disclose the police information.
Note
See also section 72 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 , which deals with the evidential burden of proof.
Yeah but what law did they break?VICTORIA POLICE ACT 2013 - SECT 227
Unauthorised access to, use of or disclosure of police information by members or former members of Victoria Police personnel—summary offence
(1) A member or former member of Victoria Police personnel must not, without reasonable excuse, access, use or disclose any police information if it is the duty of the member or former member not to access, make use of or disclose the information.
Penalty: 240 penalty units or imprisonment for 2 years or both.
(2) Without limiting what may be a reasonable excuse, it is a reasonable excuse if the member or former member took reasonable steps not to access, use or disclose the police information.
Note
See also section 72 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 , which deals with the evidential burden of proof.
Don't think it was transphobia- just excited it was a high profile person methed upIf Dean Laidley had been arrested there's no way there's no way the rozzers would have leaked photos but because it was Dani and your average cop has the eq of a ten year, out they went. It was casual transphobia pure and simple.
Hence the world casual, there was no hostility behind it but there's no way it would have been leaked had the circumstances been different.Don't think it was transphobia- just excited it was a high profile person methed up
OK so we have two higher profile footy people arrested under very unusual circumstances.Why are you asking me I don't work there.
Do you mean like it wouldn't have been leaked IF Laidley wasn't in dress?Hence the world casual, there was no hostility behind it but there's no way it would have been leaked had the circumstances been different.
I am pretty much certain. But no doubt these blokes won’t do it again.
Why wasn’t Bomber Thompson’s photo taken surreptitiously and then shared?
I'd say the community has a right to know if there's a drugged-up crossdressing lunatic lurking outside people house's, surely