Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It means to many clangers. We turn the ball over the per team the second most in the comp.
The stats don’t lie.
Suprising we have won a game.
Ranked 15th in Contested Possessions Per Game
● Ranked 18th in Metres Gained Per Game
Ranked 18th in Tackles Per Game ● Ranked 18th in Inside 50s Per Game ● Ranked 17th in Clangers Per Game ● Ranked 17th in Rebound 50s Per Game
You sure? Coming into this round we turned the ball over the second-least in the comp. 257 clangers in five rounds, behind only the Bulldogs (250).
Not pleasant reading, but to be honest the stats don't surprise me at all, especially the tackle count and the contested possessions, we play bruise free football and when our raw talent is on we cover a whole multitude of, shortcomings in the "hard yakka" work department.
We have way to many seagulls and players that are shy of physicality.
Our supporters know it.
But more poignantly the opposition coaches and players know it, put the blow torch on the West Coast players consistently and its only a matter of time before the cracks appear and they expose their soft underbelly, at which point you put your foot down, overrun and out body them.
Sad indictment on both the players, the coaching staff and the Club itself to accept this from its charges.
The Board needs to issue an emphatic " Please Explain " to all beneath them - Football Operations, Coaching and Recruiting.
First stage of fixing a problem is acknowledging that you have one.
I still think you've read this wrong Shark. Less Clangers = better. No way Kangaroos are more effective than usIt means to many clangers. We turn the ball over the per team the second most in the comp.
How I read it too. Not sugarcoating our problems but one less thing to be upset about.You sure? Coming into this round we turned the ball over the second-least in the comp. 257 clangers in five rounds, behind only the Bulldogs (250).
I still think you've read this wrong Shark. Less Clangers = better. No way Kangaroos are more effective than us
View attachment 1110999
How I read it too. Not sugarcoating our problems but one less thing to be upset about.
That’s not an overreaction at all.
65% winning record, puts him a touch ahead of Malthouse as best in club history, finals every year since 2015, flag just over two years ago. But nah sack the bloke six weeks into the season because of a bad loss.
Let’s ignore how we inconsistent we have been since 2016 - with 2018 being an outlier - and that while our recruiting of talls is very good, our midfield recruiting has been poor.
So a premiership is a meaningless “outlier”, not an achievement of the ultimate goal of playing footy. And the coach is responsible for recruiting now.
We have lost vital games due to poor team selection and predictable game tactics going back to 2019 and the only threat we pose is to the mirror from a vanity perspective.
Simpson refuses to address fundamental issues in our game plan and certain players are ‘untouchable’ no matter how bad they play.
But hey we won a premiership in 2018 so let’s forget about everything else.
So a premiership is a meaningless “outlier”, not an achievement of the ultimate goal of playing footy. And the coach is responsible for recruiting now.
And we’ve made finals every year since 2015, made two grand finals, won 65% of our games, won as many or more flags than anyone in that time bar Richmond and ... nope, that’s it.
But hey we lost a game by 97 points so let’s forget about everything else.
The thing I'd like to know is what actually happened at the end of 2018 that caused us to change our playing style out of nowhere and ramp up our contested game.The stats don’t lie.
Suprising we have won a game.
Ranked 15th in Contested Possessions Per Game
● Ranked 18th in Metres Gained Per Game
Ranked 18th in Tackles Per Game ● Ranked 18th in Inside 50s Per Game ● Ranked 17th in Clangers Per Game ● Ranked 17th in Rebound 50s Per Game
Did you actually watch his press conference? Called our players weak and alluded to them being mentally fragile, which he admitted is the responsibility of the coaching group and that they also weren't up to it.I don't disagree.
The question is, do we except this gentle gentle/softly-softly BS which apparently this cornerstone to modern coaching, or, do we demand a coach who is more brutal and not everyone's best mate?
Of all the current coaches i have seen (with the excpetion of David Teague) our coach would be the bone fide softest.
I just wanna see him truly mad so I can ascertain what sort of standards from the playing group he refuses to accept
2018 was an anomalyThe thing I'd like to know is what actually happened at the end of 2018 that caused us to change our playing style out of nowhere and ramp up our contested game.
Don't tell Miguel2018 was an anomaly
Did you actually watch his press conference? Called our players weak and alluded to them being mentally fragile, which he admitted is the responsibility of the coaching group and that they also weren't up to it.
* knows. It’s the million dollar question that will sum up this side when people look back in 10 years time. I’m too hungover to think about it right nowDon't tell Miguel
But seriously though, why? You don't just randomly change the way you play for no reason, there must have been some sort of catalyst.
Did you actually watch his press conference? Called our players weak and alluded to them being mentally fragile, which he admitted is the responsibility of the coaching group and that they also weren't up to it.
Not sure exactly what more you want him to say?
He still has to keep the playing group on side and publicly naming and shaming will lose them very fast.
Your wish for a 'rant' is completely flawed.
how did we smash port?The stats don’t lie.
Suprising we have won a game.
Ranked 15th in Contested Possessions Per Game
● Ranked 18th in Metres Gained Per Game
Ranked 18th in Tackles Per Game ● Ranked 18th in Inside 50s Per Game ● Ranked 17th in Clangers Per Game ● Ranked 17th in Rebound 50s Per Game
No one, and I mean absolutely no one said that Langdon was any good. You said that his legs had no muscle definition and then looked like a dickhead when pictures were posted showing him with legs with muscle definition.I was expecting him to just mirror the thoughts of this website
"Personally I thought the game went to custard when Brayden Ainsworth came on. Cant kick, cant run. I dont even know why he has a contract to be honest. He does nothing for me at all. Vardy is useless. Rucks for 20% of the game poorly then spends 80% of the game contemplating what he is doing with the rest of his life. He will definetly get the chop. Dont get me started on Jamie Cripps. He has the composure of a frog in a blanket. One person who wont be dropped is ThunderThighs Langdon. With leg muscles like that and his ability to hit 65m chest thumpers Id expect he will make a late charge for the Brownlow Medal"
No one, and I mean absolutely no one said that Langdon was any good. You said that his legs had no muscle definition and then looked like a dickhead when pictures were posted showing him with legs with muscle definition.
Yep the early 90s Eagles were elite.Remember when we were seriously making arguments that Simpson is better than Mick?
I'd have Woosha ahead too atm. Didn't get pumped in a Grand Final, rebuilt the team from wooden spoon to top 4, and dragged a team that was one of the worst West Coast sides of all time in 2001 to the finals in 2002, often with a forward line of Phil Matera in the early years. Had a recruitment team that knew how to draft a midfield. Hell, he even rebuilt the forward line between 2011 and 2012 when we lost all our leading goal kickers from 2011 to injury. We got pumped under Woosha in that 2008-2010 period, but at least it was a clear re-build, both culturally and on the field. This team is meant to be a contender. Injuries don't help the W-L columns, but they shouldn't have an impact on intent. Tackle, tackle, tackle.
If Simpson can turn this around, we can re-open the Woosha vs Simpson debate, but Mick is untouchable.
It tells me he's s**t.Mate, 3 times yesterday he roosted the ball and it went 35-40m? Whats that tell you