Southerntakeover
Hall of Famer
It's amazing Fogarty has played as much as he has really, given that he weighs 412 kgs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That kid that got syndesmosis is chunky erThere's no way he's under 100. He's a massive unit, with legs the size of tree trunks.
Worrell could replace Butts, Murray, Kelly, or Doedee in the named team this week. Sadly for him, Murray & Butts are preferred as KPDs, and Kelly is playing the best season of his career.You’re perception is to win the game other than to give Worrell a taste. It’s just old school serving the sponsors.
Do you know what? He plays at the weight he’s asked.It's amazing Fogarty has played as much as he has really, given that he weighs 412 kgs.
Have you ever stopped to think that Fogarty may not, in reality, be the player that you hope/wish/dream he would be?Have you ever stopped to think that we might have a few people at the club who have absolutely no ******* clue how to develop some players properly?
Ben hart was at the club during that period ffs
Sure, but Worrell isn’t a kpdWorrell could replace Butts, Murray, Kelly, or Doedee in the named team this week. Sadly for him, Murray & Butts are preferred as KPDs, and Kelly is playing the best season of his career.
Worrell's time will come, and hopefully sooner rather than later, but the vacancies which opened up this week were not ones which he could reasonably expect to fill.
I don't know what KPIs the club uses, only what KPIs the AFL chooses to include on it's publicly available stats site. The stats on that page tell exactly the story we see with our eyes - a player who is elite at marking on the lead, and converting those marks into goals, but who is "below standard" at pretty much everything else. I doubt the club's KPIs would say anything different, which is why Fogarty was dropped from the team today.No it does not cos you and I know the ip is completely different from standard.
It’s like going from whatever to Helvetica.
Embarrassing myself? You're the one who hasn't got a ****ing clue what a depth chart is, and how it differs from a positional chart.You must know you're embarrassing yourself. Why do you persist?
Not to an AFL standard, he can't. Not in the forward line, and not in the midfield. Maybe we should see if he can play at AFL standard in defence?The best part about this discussion is hearing that Fogarty cannot play anywhere on the ground.
Not to an AFL standard, he can't. Not in the forward line, and not in the midfield. Maybe we should see if he can play at AFL standard in defence?
Pretty much anyone who's watched him without rose coloured blinkers. That would include the majority of non-Adelaide supporters.Do you think anyone believes you when you say he isn't an AFL standard forward?
Have you ever stopped to think that Fogarty may not, in reality, be the player that you hope/wish/dream he would be?
Fog being dropped from today’s team no worries, three taller. I’m not necessarily arguing his place.I don't know what KPIs the club uses, only what KPIs the AFL chooses to include on it's publicly available stats site. The stats on that page tell exactly the story we see with our eyes - a player who is elite at marking on the lead, and converting those marks into goals, but who is "below standard" at pretty much everything else. I doubt the club's KPIs would say anything different, which is why Fogarty was dropped from the team today.
Pretty much anyone who's watched him without rose coloured blinkers. That would include the majority of non-Adelaide supporters.
Would be a better version in Mc Phersons positionWorrell could replace Butts, Murray, Kelly, or Doedee in the named team this week. Sadly for him, Murray & Butts are preferred as KPDs, and Kelly is playing the best season of his career.
Worrell's time will come, and hopefully sooner rather than later, but the vacancies which opened up this week were not ones which he could reasonably expect to fill.
Embarrassing myself? You're the one who hasn't got a ****ing clue what a depth chart is, and how it differs from a positional chart.
It’s probably better to Fog versus Tex.So if you asked a group of supporters at other clubs whether Darcy Fogarty would be a best 22 player at their club, you reckon "pretty much anyone" would say no?
So if you asked a group of supporters at other clubs whether Darcy Fogarty would be a best 22 player at their club, you reckon "pretty much anyone" would say no?
So if you asked a group of supporters at other clubs whether Darcy Fogarty would be a best 22 player at their club, you reckon "pretty much anyone" would say no?
Well yeah, that’s a cracking range. Sound thoughtsFogarty is simultaneously better than Lockett and also incapable of being on an AFL field because he stinks.
He has trunk legs mate it's genetic, Toumpas was the same and unfortunately this physique is not conducive to being quickFor him to become more mobile than your average Stobie Pole, he'd have to lose at least 5-10kg of muscle bulk.
I don’t think so, they’re plAying Jonex heavier. You gotta get dynamite then.He has trunk legs mate it's genetic, Toumpas was the same and unfortunately this physique is not conducive to being quick
I totally agree but the higher ups have always had an allegiance to him, especially our football director.