Bigger houses on smaller blocks.Thats a good size block these days, funny thing is most people don't want yards to maintain.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Bigger houses on smaller blocks.Thats a good size block these days, funny thing is most people don't want yards to maintain.
It isn't, and the people who bought it won't flip it again in 18 months time for a 50% increase. So stress less.I was looking at a reddit thread the other day where a house in Carnegie had been flipped for a 50% increase in 18 Months. (Approx 800k).
How is that sort of sh*t sustainable in any fashion?
More like can't afford money or time to do landscaping because they rather eat out every night and travel for life experiences.
Thats a good size block these days, funny thing is most people don't want yards to maintain.
I was looking at a reddit thread the other day where a house in Carnegie had been flipped for a 50% increase in 18 Months. (Approx 800k).
How is that sort of sh*t sustainable in any fashion?
When I hear this stuff I keep going back to the money supply. There is twice as much money in the world today cf 12 months ago.I was looking at a reddit thread the other day where a house in Carnegie had been flipped for a 50% increase in 18 Months. (Approx 800k).
How is that sort of sh*t sustainable in any fashion?
was it renovated, subdivided or something? As I find that very heard to believe if not.I was looking at a reddit thread the other day where a house in Carnegie had been flipped for a 50% increase in 18 Months. (Approx 800k).
How is that sort of sh*t sustainable in any fashion?
The developers make most of the decisions about what is built and how its built and landscaped.
Second hand car prices are up due to supply issues - apparently.
They basically want to satisfy the market.. If people can't afford bigger blocks, they get smaller.
Less room for trees and shrubs though, and it sure makes these estates depressing.
People in high numbers are using that equity in their homes to borrow more to buy cars, boats, caravans etc...
Those with few brain cells pulled their super out last year for the same reasons.
Developers rarely want to satisfy the market.......They want to Maximize their $/m2 return
Yeah, like anybody else who sells anything.. You'd do the same if you were a developer.
that's capitalism for you.
What's your point?
You're down on Capitalism because you think it's unfair people can't have what they can't afford?
It's easy for you to take the moral high ground when you're household income is what, 300k? (vaguely remember you mentioning you and your partner on good coin)I am literally the ONLY person I have seen on this thread, who is an investor that has welcomed removal of negative gearing and increased Taxation on investment properties.
The worst attempt at virtue signalling or else being dishonest about his personal circumstancesIt's easy for you to take the moral high ground when you're household income is what, 300k? (vaguely remember you mentioning you and your partner on good coin)
Screaming at the top of your lungs with I'm happy to sacrifice by paying more tax and not negative gear means it doesn't effect you the slightest if it was introduced.
It's easy for you to take the moral high ground when you're household income is what, 300k? (vaguely remember you mentioning you and your partner on good coin)
Screaming at the top of your lungs with I'm happy to sacrifice by paying more tax and not negative gear means it doesn't effect you the slightest if it was introduced.
God.
Any sortof unselfish, kind, or generous attitude is now “virtue signalling”.
fu** me.