- Nov 11, 2012
- 34,784
- 40,788
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Yep cause he gets up and back quickCan we go McLean, Buddy, McDonald?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Yep cause he gets up and back quickCan we go McLean, Buddy, McDonald?
CS Tickets went on sale today.Are those saying they are getting tickets MCC members? My member emails have tickets on sale tomorrow?
Can’t go McLean, buddy amd Sinclair simple imo
Ball will walk out
I know Fritsch is having a good season (ave 3 goals a game), but I think playing against him rather than his likely replacement in Weideman suits our defenders better.Fritsch free to play
Of course he is, playing a non-victorian club.Fritsch free to play
Fritsch free to play
General consensus is that Weideman will come in regardless (McDonald to replace Tomlinson at CHB)I know Fritsch is having a good season (ave 3 goals a game), but I think playing against him rather than his likely replacement in Weideman suits our defenders better.
Fair enough.General consensus is that Weideman will come in regardless (McDonald to replace Tomlinson at CHB)
That is very very lucky.
And he got off. Seems worthwhile challenging.He won't get off but these new challenge rules are silly, it's only a 10k penalty for challenging...and they wonder why every bloke challenges in finals...
Not so different to the Dangerfield result in the end.I have no legal knowledge and even I know an appeal using this as an example would be thrown out in an instant. Dangerfield had just punched the ball and drew his outstretched arm back into protect himself from the oncoming player. Fritsch had possession of the ball and raised his arm in an attempt to fend off. I can only assume that he can't get any more than 1 week and that is why they are trying it on. The likes of Fox Footy trying to suggest these two are similar is laughable.
And he got off. Seems worthwhile challenging.
No real estate talk on here please, ever. Last time I was in Sydney I stopped going to barbies because there was always some ignorant twat rattling on about real estate. The planet is burning but people talk about real estate. WTF ? Not saying you're one of those twats but it just pissed me off. Houses are homes, for people to live in, not commodities.Real estate averages 8% growth p.a. All depends on the interest you pay.
I watched and re-watched the footage and all I can say is "What's the point of handing out bans and fines if a tribunal can override them ?" Like McCartin, he was clearly guilty. He raised his forearm and smacked a young player in the head. Case closed.That Fritz decision by the Tribunal is disgraceful. It just flies in the face of everything else including McCartin who, in my opinion, got his right whack.
Ir just makes no sense.
One could argue that in and out means the team doesn't depend on him. Buddy needs to be told to demand the ball when he's in best position but otherwise create opportunities for others. I think Papley's been told this year. Last year he was always calling for it, short, long, even on top of his head, despite being a relative midget. This year he's as likely to point to someone else who's free.I was actually a bit disappointed at the “Buddy back” news.
Like Ben Brown coming into the Demons, or Cameron into the Cats - the introduction of a new “demanding” forward upsets the team cohesion for a while.
Buddy is an asset if he plays consistently. But if he appears sporadically, I see it as a problem.
You can’t make one mistake then keep repeating it in the name of precedence....there is no clarity now when an elbow to the head is considered fair play.Not so different to the Dangerfield result in the end.
So you are comparing Buddy to Ben Brown....I have now heard everything. This notion of Buddy being a demanding forward is interesting, it’s not up to Buddy who kicks him the ball. The player with the ball in hand needs to make better decisions, every forward worth their salt should demand the ball inside forward fifty.I was actually a bit disappointed at the “Buddy back” news.
Like Ben Brown coming into the Demons, or Cameron into the Cats - the introduction of a new “demanding” forward upsets the team cohesion for a while.
Buddy is an asset if he plays consistently. But if he appears sporadically, I see it as a problem.
Brown 2 goals from 5 touches in first game back. He still adds to their firepower and their mids are also kicking goals. Shut down Fritsch and we'll go a long way towards winning. McCartin takes Brown. Rampe can take Fritsch (if he's back). Then we need to win in the middle.Yeah bit of a joke that overturn. But Brown doesn't worry me whatsoever. He's extremely easy to play on cuz he can only do one thing. Weideman and fritsch the 2 concerns.
Taking down tigers, cats , lions and demons would be a massive, massive effort for the club