- Thread starter
- #751
Bounce the ball ffs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
What would you have done this week as the MC?
Yes that was when he out of form but Teague played SPS forward of centre and he delivered with 14 possessions in half a game. You don't drop a player when they performYou wanted SPS dropped before the Essendon game...
Cmon, Gibbons was borderline diabolical last week. Had a couple of nice moments maybe but was bad overall and has been that way almost the whole year.
I like the bloke but he is clearly down on form atm.
He had 3 bad moments which I have highlighted in an earlier post, so my retort is based on dealing with limited research.
Where this idea of Gibbo being bad for a so called, month, several weeks, all year, is mostly due to not hitting the scoreboard of late
If gibbons isn’t hitting the scoreboard he is basically useless to the team, so that is where the idea comes from.
5 touches against Brisbane, 3 effective didn’t help his cause either.
He was poor last week. He's been poor ever since Betts was picked and Gibbo was pushed out of the pocked up the ground a bit. Might be a function of his position but his ability to impact games when they're still close has been horrendous. He's been a junk time king recently.Think I and many others have acknowledged he was poor in that game, but to state he has been poor for several weeks, or even last week, is laughable
Fairly meaningless stat without knowing the contest each was involved in .. Similar to the Dow reference above, of course he's going to have relatively low DE when playing at the coalface - for the position, you cop that (though not 33%) ... Unfortunately for Dow, I'm not sure how much his would improve regardless of where he played. Gibbons generally has a lot more time than players at the centre bounce, yet recently he's still fluffing it; that's the difference.
Oh... I can go on about quite a few other players too (two of them have been omitted this week), but Gibbo is rightly in the spotlight atm.
Think I and many others have acknowledged he was poor in that game, but to state he has been poor for several weeks, or even last week, is laughable
We need Williams to play his best game for the club today.Our talls will either win or lose this game for us tommorrow -midfield will even out over 4 quarters.
This. Cripps and Ed will get 80 percent of centre bounce time. Leaves 140. Walsh probably gets 60 (I think he plays a bit of wing this week). Cunners and Zac will split their time there. 40/40 mid forward for them.Just don't get the angst. Unless Dow (and to a lesser extent) SPS are going to play on ball,/centre clearances for most of the game we are just trying to shoehorn them in to flanks and positions that water down their effect.
To me (hopefully) this is Teague saying that Cuners is playing a lot of centre bounces with Zac quite a few. Chuck in Cripper, Walsh and Ed then there's not that many left available.
Sounds like a vote of confidence in David cuningham to me.
Thank God we have had the one and only complete arbitrator of all things football join us.Gibbons was beyond atrocious last week. Has a few nice highlights but overall his game has been hot garbage.
Nobody watching our games could come to the conclusion he’s been paying well.
If you’re of the opinion that he played well last week then I’m really not sure about your ability to grasp what makes a good footballer.
He was poor last week. He's been poor ever since Betts was picked and Gibbo was pushed out of the pocked up the ground a bit. Might be a function of his position but his ability to impact games when they're still close has been horrendous. He's been a junk time king recently.
His last good game was against Freo
I'm not targeting Gibbo. I'm targeting the decision to play both him and Betts in the same team.It's strange, some numbers are open to a variety of interpretations, but not when he is featuring in so many that are key indicators, especially compared to more than half our players
As for this padding, downhill skiing, junk time possessions analysis, I find that really strange, considering the game was still in the balance well into the last qtr and more than half of his possessions were contested
But just like Newnes, Levi and Gibbo, I know exactly why people are targeting these types
I'm not targeting Gibbo. I'm targeting the decision to play both him and Betts in the same team.
I was also against playing an injured Levi because I believed that to be unfair on him. Just adjust the structure felt a better and more efficient thing to do.
Newnes is there till Lob takes the spot off him.
This. Gotta take their run away from them and force them to kick to contests ESPECIALLY in their forward line. Also don’t give them the corridor.Anyway, it's gameday, how do we beat the Dogs.....
Good start would be lifting our contested game, but that is a tactical decision that starts with Teague
This. Gotta take their run away from them and force them to kick to contests ESPECIALLY in their forward line. Also don’t give them the corridor.
I stated that we couldn't play Murphy and Betts in the same team, that's now changed for the better, although Betts will continue to be inconsistent, so I prefer a different setup up
Levi is a warrior, our list management has let him down for well over 10 years
Newnes is there till any player takes his spot, but that goes for any player in the side