Preview Round 13: North Melbourne vs GWS @ Blundstone Arena | Sunday, 13 June @ 15:20

[Snake_Baker]

Who do you think will take Flynn in that scenario?

I haven't factored if he will play or what his role will be.

If the Giants go with Himmelberg/Finlayson/Flynn in the forward half at Bellerive, then I reckon they will be choking themselves.

 

[Orange crush]

I’d be surprised if they didn’t go in with Mummy + Flynn .... it’s worked well

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

I would be interested to see if there are any tweaks to the gameplan and forward structure after a bit of a midseason review.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Interesting comments re "selection pressure".

 

[Snake_Baker]

I’d be surprised if they didn’t go in with Mummy + Flynn .... it’s worked well

Fair enough. North have been playing 2 rucks. Whether that persists with Tarrant's return remains to be seen.

 

[Val Keating]

With Taz back, Walker forward is a no brainer.

 

[Snake_Baker]

With Taz back, Walker forward is a no brainer.

Josh did do a pretty good job in round 7.

McDonald: 5 marks (0 inside 50/0 contested), 0 goals, 0 goal assists, 1 inside 50, 3 score involvements.
Walker: 8 marks (2 contested), 7 intercepts, 11 x 1%ers.

Statistically, it was McDonald's weakest game of the season. He also took Gawn & Jackson at times and that lot combined added 1.1.

 

[TurnoverMerchant]

Greene, Davis and de Boer to be back this week. We need to be switched on for this game!

 

[disco_cowboy]

Greene, Davis and de Boer to be back this week. We need to be switched on for this game!

de boer v cunnington?

 

[buttox]

de boer v cunnington?

You would think so.
If they choose to tag.
I think its more likely they dont tag as they dont deem us to be a threat.

 

[Val Keating]

Josh did do a pretty good job in round 7.

McDonald: 5 marks (0 inside 50/0 contested), 0 goals, 0 goal assists, 1 inside 50, 3 score involvements.
Walker: 8 marks (2 contested), 7 intercepts, 11 x 1%ers.

Statistically, it was McDonald's weakest game of the season. He also took Gawn & Jackson at times and that lot combined added 1.1.

I’m not knocking his defence. I think with Taz back, it’s better structurally for him to play forward.

 

[danj]

Walker isn't a Gorilla.

The left field move that would catch my attention is McKay to the forward line.

Surely we need Tarrant and McKay in the backline? I think having Walker in the forward line to provide a foil for Larkey is a better option.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Surely we need Tarrant and McKay in the backline? I think having Walker in the forward line to provide a foil for Larkey is a better option.

I dunno what they will do mate. Been that way all season.

 

[muttley45]

Garner to Whitfield ? i want him to have close company most of the time.

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Garner to Whitfield ? i want him to have close company most of the time.

Scott tag.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Garner to Whitfield ? i want him to have close company most of the time.

The only way TG goes with him is if he knocks him out cold.

 

[muttley45]

Scott tag.

Maybe, i wouldn't mind seeing him line up on Kelly

 

[Val Keating]

Scott tag.

Perfect role for him

 

[giantroo]

 

[giantroo]

 

[Snake_Baker]

NO Davis.

 

[The Nostradamus]

menadue stiff

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Stevo and Taz straight in, Walker to CHF and Campbell to the bench by the looks of it.

 

[Val Keating]

He’d be stiff to miss but I reckon they might leave Campbell out and have a look at Walker up forward. Makes us more mobile but means Larkey has to ruck

 

[Ligma]

This is a winnable game imo.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com