Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Caroline Wilson

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Don’t get the angst over Caro - she was right about Clarko, and was the first to talk about it.

Now she’s copping it for getting the word on the meetings there last week - if you’re still doubting she has a source I’d suggest you’re a dufflecoat nuffie
In what way was she right?

BTW, not having a dig, genuinely want to know.
 
Don’t get the angst over Caro - she was right about Clarko, and was the first to talk about it.

Now she’s copping it for getting the word on the meetings there last week - if you’re still doubting she has a source I’d suggest you’re a dufflecoat nuffie

Someone on the Hawks board broke it DAYS before the media had a clue.

Also her description of the meeting was like 3rd hand news. Maybe it was antagonistic. Maybe it was mediation. Maybe it was a chat.

But then "for sure he wont be there coaching next year". Reputation on the line eh Caro ?

The CEO and President are both talking down the angst and desire to shove Clarko. He has said he isnt going anywhere.

If Clarko does get pushed and Reeves and Kennett lied I imagine there will be an alterate ticket at an EAGM which will probably win.

The fun bit is what clauses are in Reeves' 5 year contract.
 
Don’t get the angst over Caro - she was right about Clarko, and was the first to talk about it.

Now she’s copping it for getting the word on the meetings there last week - if you’re still doubting she has a source I’d suggest you’re a dufflecoat nuffie
Has anyone else gone with the story though?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Had to laugh last night on Footy Classified, as I turned it off, her next big statement, you heard it here first in my most earnest voice, that "I don't believe David Teague will be coaching Carlton next year because blah blah secret dealing blah blah. You don't say.
 
Someone on the Hawks board broke it DAYS before the media had a clue.

Also her description of the meeting was like 3rd hand news. Maybe it was antagonistic. Maybe it was mediation. Maybe it was a chat.

But then "for sure he wont be there coaching next year". Reputation on the line eh Caro ?

The CEO and President are both talking down the angst and desire to shove Clarko. He has said he isnt going anywhere.

If Clarko does get pushed and Reeves and Kennett lied I imagine there will be an alterate ticket at an EAGM which will probably win.

The fun bit is what clauses are in Reeves' 5 year contract.
We garner normalcy dude..priority is players and supporters
 
Someone on the Hawks board broke it DAYS before the media had a clue.

Also her description of the meeting was like 3rd hand news. Maybe it was antagonistic. Maybe it was mediation. Maybe it was a chat.

But then "for sure he wont be there coaching next year". Reputation on the line eh Caro ?

The CEO and President are both talking down the angst and desire to shove Clarko. He has said he isnt going anywhere.

If Clarko does get pushed and Reeves and Kennett lied I imagine there will be an alterate ticket at an EAGM which will probably win.

The fun bit is what clauses are in Reeves' 5 year contract.
They have their own agenda ….Reeves has me worried…he can strike the match at any time
 
She's obviously been told something by someone inside Hawthorn. And that person has characterised the Mitchell/Clarkson relationship a certain way, and the club and Mitchell/Clarkson prefer it not be characterised that way publicly.

Maybe Hawthorn powerbrokers should spend less time potting Wilson and more time asking who has been talking to her?
 
She's obviously been told something by someone inside Hawthorn. And that person has characterised the Mitchell/Clarkson relationship a certain way, and the club and Mitchell/Clarkson prefer it not be characterised that way publicly.

Yep. Im sure she has a source. But how senior are they, are they actually involved in the discussions, and what is their agenda.

The unknowns that would reveal everything about how reliable the info is.

Caro thinks its real or at least real enough that she can gossip about it. But with everyone involved saying its not true it does make you wonder.
 
Yep. Im sure she has a source. But how senior are they, are they actually involved in the discussions, and what is their agenda.

The unknowns that would reveal everything about how reliable the info is.

Caro thinks its real or at least real enough that she can gossip about it. But with everyone involved saying its not true it does make you wonder.
I used to like her but she has become a too incendiary figure…she drops bombs with out rhyme nor reason
 
Yep. Im sure she has a source. But how senior are they, are they actually involved in the discussions, and what is their agenda.
Surely this was addressed by the statement: Maybe Hawthorn powerbrokers should spend less time potting Wilson and more time asking who has been talking to her?

Caro thinks its real or at least real enough that she can gossip about it. But with everyone involved saying its not true it does make you wonder.
Or the situation has changed.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

She's obviously been told something by someone inside Hawthorn. And that person has characterised the Mitchell/Clarkson relationship a certain way, and the club and Mitchell/Clarkson prefer it not be characterised that way publicly.

Maybe Hawthorn powerbrokers should spend less time potting Wilson and more time asking who has been talking to her?

Why? Who cares what Caro says?
 
A lot of people hoping for her to have a stuff up as though it would validate all the previous instances she was right when they were desperate for her to be wrong.
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Surely that would be a significant development.

Yep. But the likelihood is maybe 0.1%.

Which is all the media need to make a story.

Would be interesting to know what % of media rumours end up actually correct. Probably 10%. Maybe 20%. But definitely no higher.
 
Yep. But the likelihood is maybe 0.1%.

Which is all the media need to make a story.

Would be interesting to know what % of media rumours end up actually correct. Probably 10%. Maybe 20%. But definitely no higher.
You asked "who cares what Caro says?"

If she's right, people will care.

Clearly her story is based on something.
 
You asked "who cares what Caro says?"

If she's right, people will care.

Clearly her story is based on something.

I didnt ask that. Her story is definitely based on rumour. We have no idea how senior or connected her leak was.

And in the last 2 weeks she has warned Sam Mitchell and warned Tim Watson.

Is she now an enforcer?
 
I didnt ask that.
My bad. It was another poster. But that was the basis for my post that you quoted.

Her story is definitely based on rumour. We have no idea how senior or connected her leak was.
So the story is based on a leak. That's not the same as "based on a rumour".

And in the last 2 weeks she has warned Sam Mitchell and warned Tim Watson.

Is she now an enforcer?
You can object to her tone but that's not the same as discrediting the story, which she is entitled to defend as much as she wants.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom