- Jul 11, 2019
- 7,076
- 8,413
- AFL Club
- Richmond
and this made you a moronWell that'd make you the nobody.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
and this made you a moronWell that'd make you the nobody.
and this made you a moron
Unlike you I have never reported anyone in the SFA.Unlike you, I'll own my reports masher
For the after party?I see the Fiji sub-committee’s out in force tonight. Anyone bring some kava?
Won't be the lastLabel-five!
Won't be the last
Eventually you'll have more labels then a kindergarteners lunchbox
Your mind is really defiled (well that's obvious reading your posts) if you connect every reference of children to paedophillia.
Your mind is really defiled (well that's obvious reading your posts) if you connect every reference of children to paedophillia.
Ummmmm, you just made it about that, the other post merely said to stop referencing children.
You made the leap, then blamed someone else.
More hypocrisy. Dear, oh dear
Your mind is really defiled (well that's obvious reading your posts) if you connect every reference of children to paedophillia.
Was hoping for better, pity. Some of them had potentialIts hard work playing against ******* SPUDS jab ...
Good job hivemind, only took 3 of you to say the same thing. If you think a reference to children is offensive then clearly you must be making some link to the profane. If you want to shy away from that be my guest. But no amount of mental gymnastics will hide the vulgarity of this young melter's mind.
I'm not backing away from my comment, like you are. And you guys talk about hypocrisy??Geez have a look at the bloke frantically looking for an exit.
It's a lunchbox settle down. But sure, I'll stop.You really need to stop referencing children in everyone of your posts. Ned_Flanders will report you.
fu**! Did you just use the term “ableist”???
fu** me.
M. This “with us or against us” stance drives a divide between people that you’re advocating against. We shriek so loudly, and so persistently, that none of us can hear each other. And the longer it goes on, the less we want to.
I should clarify. I admire those, like you, who fight for good. Who protest against wrong. I watch on and cheer, however I’ve never marched on anything, nor have I waved a placard.
But I do have a natural abhorrence toward racism, homophobia, misogyny, man hating, bullying, bigotry, intolerance or discrimination in any guise. Mostly because it’s unintelligent, but obviously because it’s indecent. I would certainly want it all to end. And surely that’s a given amongst all of us. At least the majority of us.
My question to you is, how is this to be achieved? Preachiness? Piety, denunciation, shaming, accusation, throwing around “…IST” at everyone who challenges us???
Maybe. But doubtful.
Hence my objection to that term. It appears to embody and embrace everything you’re fighting against.
We’d all like the dream, M. To achieve a fair and just world, where everyone is treated with the respect and value they deserve. I just don’t think this language helps. Further more, I see nothing to suggest, it works at all.
One of our greatest human failings, and a major flaw in the human condition, is to prefer to be right, than to be effective.
Progress, and decency, which is what you’re demanding, are not achieved by preachers, semantics, or being right.
We should welcome being proven wrong. It helps us grow. We know what we know. We believe what we believe. Being convinced of something different is how we learn something. Resorting to name calling doesn’t teach anyone anything, nor does it help us learn.
We’ve come a long way, M. However I feel it has less to do with labels, and more to do with genuine human decency. There’s still much work to be done. So let’s focus less on being “correct” and more on being decent.
I'm not backing away from my comment, like you are. And you guys talk about hypocrisy??
It's a lunchbox settle down. But sure, I'll stop.
Don't imply vulgar things then, sicko.I haven't backed away from anything. Y'all took every comment to a f’ed up place. Not my responsibility to reign you back in.
Don't imply vulgar things then, sicko.
Any works.In what order
Never did. That implies some form of intent. Once again you've all taken it to f’ed up places.