The Falcon Strike
Hall of Famer
In yesterday's derby, David Mundy
, whilst in possession of the ball lifted his elbow to deal with a tackler - in a genuine attempt to dispose of the ball.
The result was the tackler losing teeth.
By any view - what Mundy did was perfectly fair and the result on the tackler was nothing more than the unfortunate result of playing a contact sport.
Toby Greene
would be given two weeks for the same incident
The MRP was supposed to make things more consistent, what we end up having is subjective treatment of a players guilt based on past events or whether they are a good bloke or not.
Surely the incident should be assessed on it's own merits - and only when guilty should punishment then be decided based on past form.
What we end up getting is some "good blokes" like Joel Selwood get away with murder and other "bad blokes" get pinged for football incidents.
Whinge over
PLAYERCARDSTART
16
David Mundy
- Age
- 38
- Ht
- 192cm
- Wt
- 92kg
- Pos.
- Mid
Career
Season
Last 5
- D
- 23.1
- 5star
- K
- 11.2
- 4star
- HB
- 11.8
- 5star
- M
- 3.6
- 4star
- T
- 4.3
- 5star
- CL
- 5.1
- 5star
- D
- 15.7
- 4star
- K
- 6.7
- 3star
- HB
- 9.0
- 4star
- M
- 2.3
- 2star
- T
- 2.7
- 4star
- CL
- 3.7
- 5star
- D
- 27.8
- 5star
- K
- 15.4
- 5star
- HB
- 12.4
- 5star
- M
- 5.8
- 5star
- T
- 6.2
- 5star
- CL
- 7.2
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
The result was the tackler losing teeth.
By any view - what Mundy did was perfectly fair and the result on the tackler was nothing more than the unfortunate result of playing a contact sport.
Toby Greene
PLAYERCARDSTART
4
Toby Greene
- Age
- 30
- Ht
- 182cm
- Wt
- 85kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
Career
Season
Last 5
- D
- 22.7
- 5star
- K
- 12.5
- 5star
- HB
- 10.2
- 5star
- M
- 4.8
- 5star
- T
- 3.0
- 5star
- G
- 1.2
- 4star
- D
- 17.5
- 4star
- K
- 9.5
- 4star
- HB
- 8.0
- 4star
- M
- 4.8
- 4star
- T
- 1.0
- 2star
- G
- 2.3
- 5star
- D
- 26.6
- 5star
- K
- 12.4
- 5star
- HB
- 14.2
- 5star
- M
- 4.8
- 5star
- T
- 3.6
- 5star
- G
- 0.0
- 1star
PLAYERCARDEND
The MRP was supposed to make things more consistent, what we end up having is subjective treatment of a players guilt based on past events or whether they are a good bloke or not.
Surely the incident should be assessed on it's own merits - and only when guilty should punishment then be decided based on past form.
What we end up getting is some "good blokes" like Joel Selwood get away with murder and other "bad blokes" get pinged for football incidents.
Whinge over