Crowden was very good when he went to inside mid. The others I agree wih you. Shame we are trying to re-sign Tucker. I hope he is only depth.List cloggers like Acres, Crowden and Tucker all have to go after that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Crowden was very good when he went to inside mid. The others I agree wih you. Shame we are trying to re-sign Tucker. I hope he is only depth.List cloggers like Acres, Crowden and Tucker all have to go after that.
I slept in too. Didn't watch the game until half timeDon’t blame them, it’s Sunday and I’m only just waking up too
Pearce was actually decent. Never understood why he was maligned. Fit, could run and helped Hill and others break free.Who’s kicks have a worse height to length ratio
Blake Acres or Danyle Pierce
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
Indeed. One can only assume that Bell must have decided to can Hughes as he is rookie listed and uncontracted I think. A real shame, as for all his faults Hughes always gives 110% and never shirks a tackle, way better list depth option than Tucker, Acres or Bewley.- I'm generally in favour of JLo phasing out guys who stifle our ball movement but I'm mystified that Hughes can't get a game when we're clearly one of the softest teams in the comp. Especially when someone like Acres gets a run who's a worse distributer and adds nothing defensively
Tucker had no possessions? Yikes. He’s cooked and only 24.What is Blake Acres? I have no idea what this guy is suppose to be doing on the footy field.
Even more amazing is Darcy Tucker not having a single possession after HT. Our forward line is a huge issue, and frankly JLo can fu** off if he thinks supporters will be happy with burning a high pick on some Vicco kid who can run fast.
As much as i agree and like crowden in the midfield ... it shows what's wring with our list.Shoutout to Crowden for a promising game in the middle when given a chance. Crowden, Serong, Ryan, Young, Brayshaw, Mundy and Switta before getting injured played at the required level. The rest got injured, didn’t turn up, or clearly weren’t at the level required for AFL
Pearce was actually decent. Never understood why he was maligned. Fit, could run and helped Hill and others break free.
I don’t know but at least Danyle was capable of the sublime. Acres is barely capable of the reasonable.Who’s kicks have a worse height to length ratio
Blake Acres or Danyle Pierce
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
Add Bewley to that list. Total waste of time
uAdd Bewley to that list. Total waste of time
He has a 3 year deal. Next ideaIndeed. One can only assume that Bell must have decided to can Hughes as he is rookie listed and uncontracted I think. A real shame, as for all his faults Hughes always gives 110% and never shirks a tackle, way better list depth option than Tucker, Acres or Bewley.
Hughes? 3 years?u
He has a 3 year deal. Next idea
u
He has a 3 year deal. Next idea
I hate Fremantle for trading for him.I hate Blake Acres.
Don't agree about Henry being soft. That mark he took late was very courageous. He is young and slight. His defensive run is an issue, I agree.Yes I forgot I was going to mention him.
The very definition of a nothing player. Built like Tarzan, plays like Jane.
I'd get rid and play Henry on the wing next year. Solves two problems:
i) that Henry is the very definition of softness in any contest - and gives absolutely no chase whatsoever up forward - yet looks good in space; and ii) that Bewley does absolutely nothing in space and can't get involved in the slightest.
I would like to apologise to everyone
Some of the contracts we give out are just insane