- Aug 10, 2005
- 46,545
- 42,486
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

We arn't in GF because we went out in straight sets. Full stop.
So you’re saying we would have beaten port?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
We arn't in GF because we went out in straight sets. Full stop.
I’m not in the “throw out the baby and the bath water” camp but I’m also not in the “success is inevitable with this list” group. I think the truth is somewhere in between.2019 Finals > QF- Tigers 112 d Lions 65. SF- Giants 83 d Lions 80.
2020 Finals > QF- Lions 69 d Tigers 54. PF- Cats 82 d Lions 42.
2021 Finals > QF- Demons 93 d Lions 60. SF- Bulldogs 79 d Lions 78.
_____________________________________________________________________
The 2019 QF in our first final in eons against a seasoned finals side was to be expected.
The 2020 PF and 2021 QF were 2 disappointing performances, for some inexplicable reason we didn't look totally up for it on the night.
The 2020 QF performance was awesome, our next step is bringing that sort of heat to all our finals.
The 2019 SF and 2021 SF were toss of the coin games still in the balance in the last 30 seconds, bounce of the ball away from the Prelims, no way you could say we were shown up for much at all in those 2 games. Nearly every premiership side has gone through a few years of heartbreak in the years preceding the flag win.
Onward and upward towards 2022............ and beyond, with some clever trading and nailing a few draft selections we should be highly competitive for the rest of this decade, even post Richy, Zorks --- Lyons and Neale.
if we played last night Port probably would of turned upSo you’re saying we would have beaten port?
Sorry to butt in but if we won last week against the Dogs, we would have won against Port. No doubt in my mind.So you’re saying we would have beaten port?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
if we played last night Port probably would of turned up
Maybe we got through and made it to GF
Melb would of smashed us for a third time in the year
Sorry being pessimistic. Like the Cats our slow slow game plan then bomb it into 50 does not work under pressure
Swans, Dogs twice, Melb Twice, Saints, Tigers and Hawks beat us when they put pressure on us.
Yes we lost to both grand finalists twice.
Which shows we still not up to it
That's also not including players who may have expressed wish to come/asked their managers to enquire, but were told sorry we don't have room for you. I don't know of any specific names, but I imagine there would have been some in the background. I imagine some players during the Hawks' successful era may have been knocked back as well.I think Hodge, Cameron, Neale, Adams, McCarthy, Lyons, Birchall, Daniher, and Cockatoo is very much destination club worthy. You only have to look back at the list of players we traded in from 2010-2017 to see just how stark that change has been. Also - draftees wanting to come here and stay here is another sign of that.
Reading this thread I just dont get how/why we would casually discuss this year being 'the one that got away'.
This scenario has us going 3 and 1 to win a flag or 2 and 1 to make a Granny... we went 0-2?
We also have a 1-5 record recently in finals.
Who is this incredible Lions finals team we are discussing? who plays in it? who coaches it?
The list we have now and the coach we have now is eminently capable of winning a flag, just need a little luck re timing of injuries.... IMO.Who is this incredible Lions finals team we are discussing? who plays in it? who coaches it?
I think luck has played a significant part but not enough of a part to have stopped us if we'd played a bit better at crucial stages.Nobody is saying it was the one that got away more so that going out in straight sets looks worse than it actually was
And the finals records doesn't look so bad considering we've never played a final against a non-top 2 team
I believe we are a team that relies too much on emotion to raise our performance. Until we find that balance to perform at a benchmark standard regularly and not depend on external emotional fixers to motivate us we will regularly fall short of reaching the ultimate success. What the Dees and Bulldogs and the Tigers before have shown is how to win games relying on nothing more than the game plan and the players maintaining consistent form following such plan.
Yes we are 1-5 but only because we lost on the weekend.I know its easy for the mind to go there with the 'we should be in a GF', 'it hurts even more now' etc.. im seeing it everywhere from Lions fans. but I just can't personally. We are 1 and 5 in finals. We can't win them in the real world, so no point torturing ourselves, thinking about an alternate world where we are in a GF. History suggests we lose to Port given our big game record. We may well have got their and shat the bed or Port may have had a different mind set, its a totally different game. We arnt the Dogs, they are back to the wall specialists who are on a roll.
I get the sentiment but I can't connect the dots between.. straights sets and we should be in a granny.
What it does do, it reaffirms we did well with injured players againts 2 good teams. It reaffirms we are close. It reaffirms, once again, we are the 3rd or 4th best team in the comp.
Dees and Bulldogs maintained a constant level throughout the year. Unlike us, did not have to rely much on emotional sweetener fix.Not sure I agree with this at all. We saw last night what happens when a team comes out fired up and one is going through the motion
Dees and Bulldogs maintained a constant level throughout the year. Unlike us, did not have to rely much on emotional sweetener fix.
The discussion is obviously predicated on an ounce more luck v the dogs which takes us to 1-1. Going from there to 2-1 hardly the greatest leap to make.Reading this thread I just dont get how/why we would casually discuss this year being 'the one that got away'.
This scenario has us going 3 and 1 to win a flag or 2 and 1 to make a Granny... we went 0-2?
We also have a 1-5 record recently in finals.
Who is this incredible Lions finals team we are discussing? who plays in it? who coaches it?
Revisionist history.Dees and Bulldogs maintained a constant level throughout the year. Unlike us, did not have to rely much on emotional sweetener fix.
Mew, a form slump rather than an emotional roller coaster type season.Revisionist history.
Melbourne had a spell where they went 2-1-3, failing to get over the line against three non-finals teams and you must have a really short memory to forgot the Dogs' 0-3 end to the season costing them a top 4 spot to us that included two complete collapses.
Dees and Bulldogs have been very good across the year, but it was definitely not constant compared to some other teams in previous years.
A bit of credit to Goodwin.Revisionist history.
Melbourne had a spell where they went 2-1-3, failing to get over the line against three non-finals teams and you must have a really short memory to forgot the Dogs' 0-3 end to the season costing them a top 4 spot to us that included two complete collapses.
Dees and Bulldogs have been very good across the year, but it was definitely not constant compared to some other teams in previous years.
Dees and Bulldogs maintained a constant level throughout the year. Unlike us, did not have to rely much on emotional sweetener fix.
Our side post the Fantastic 4 and Daniher/McCarthy/Adams(all 3 28 before next season starts) from current players, their age at start of 2025 in brackets >Onward and upward towards 2022............ and beyond, with some clever trading and nailing a few draft selections we should be highly competitive for the rest of this decade, even post Richy, Zorks --- Lyons and Neale.