- Moderator
- #226
Its pretty indisputably a contentious decision, you yourself are acknowledging its inconsistent but its also not in the top 10 worst decisions for the year but youre also saying overall theyve done a good job.You can go around the ball without going near the nose or face or anywhere that is even going to cause head trauma. I mean the Roosters love a good whinge when it affects them but when it's against them they want the rules applied differently. Verrils wouldn't even be in the worst 10 decisions of the year there have been plenty worse.
Pick a lane mate.