Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Lol. Give it up .You sound like a women hater. Your mum is a women don't forget .How do #metoo evangelists respond to these claims about Australia's female soccer players?
I hope they treat these accusations as seriously as they would if they were levelled against a man.
Football Australia to investigate abuse allegations by Matildas players
Football Australia says it will investigate after players allege sexual harassment by teammates.www.google.com
Your mum is a women
How do #metoo evangelists respond to these claims about Australia's female soccer players?
I hope they treat these accusations as seriously as they would if they were levelled against a man.
Football Australia to investigate abuse allegations by Matildas players
Football Australia says it will investigate after players allege sexual harassment by teammates.www.google.com
there circle will only be completed when men make allegations of women making a pass at themI dont understand what you're on about here.
Or rather I understand that you don't understand.
What?there circle will only be completed when men make allegations of women making a pass at them
we have almost each quadrant completed
No current season stats available
Ofcourse it happens , most men take it in their stride and will not find offence when none intendedWhat?
That happens, and it's really hard for men to deal with it, because it's still looked at as humorous to some.
Finding or taking offence is only one aspect in certain circumstances. The same as intending offence isn't necessarily required.Ofcourse it happens , most men take it in their stride and will not find offence when none intended
There might be some things that come and go, like extreme ends. But I think it's more an ongoing evolution of our existence. As our societies become 'more equal', we're better able to understand each other. Is that an era you'd want to end?but this zeitgeist
No society is perfect, it can always improve.sees offence and victimisation as badges of honour to be exploited.
Bad behaviour is bad behaviour
I'd hope that the majority of time it's more somewhere near the middle of 'take it in their stride' and 'Fairfax weaponised megaphone'.does it merit being plastered across Fairfax and weaponised with megaphone ?
But that's been throughout our history. The aim is to reduce how far it goes each time.ReneGirard scapegoat theory
It is not , life seems to have evolved to pit people against people , man/woman old/young whitemen/everyoneelse , political left/right which has become nasty beyond traditional politics , everything is nazi or right-wing , I do not understand the language , everything is flipped or actually verging on fascism , actual Mussolini fascism , I think the pedagogy of my decade has failed the current graduating class ..
As long as the quality of life overall is improving, shouldn't it be worked towards?
Ok.It is not , life seems to have evolved to pit people against people , man/woman old/young whitemen/everyoneelse
not that folks on here would be aware , but I attempt to treat all with generosity and heart , because ALOT of our society require it ... #1 Adam Goodes deserving AOTY* but Mac-Tip and mark Bolton of Bombers would have been equally deserving.
See amount of homeless Melbournians in AclandSt CarlisleStBalaclava ElizabethSt WindsorChapelSt , it has been precipitous since the last half dozen years well before covid
*AG was used by the body in Canberra for the authority's own ends , one of top10 players ever in my reckoning
No actually , I don't support how we have happened to have homeless concern , I sit down and talk to folks and bring food*Ok.
It is, because it is your position.
And you can't support that, because we're too inexperienced and/or uninstructed.
What do you mean? Why does it have to be so binary?No actually , I don't support how we have happened to have homeless concern , I sit down and talk to folks and bring food*
I don't think you represent the problem , Kennett closed Kew cottages and sold schools to Bailieu developments right? I am square in the centre , but I dont see those who mouth woke homilies shoulder2shoulder with Mark Bolton
I see those who mouth the homilies utterly ignorant that the ubereats immigrant delivery person is on indentured servant wages and shares his bedroom 2 to a single bed. I am against that person's conditions in Australiaas much as I am against conditions in Aboriginal stations in NT
*CS Lewis caveat
Why?I am against that person's conditions in Australiaas much as I am against conditions in Aboriginal stations in NT
Yeah, good one.*CS Lewis caveat
I attempt to treat all with generosity and heart
What a nonsensical post.I dont understand what you're on about here.
Or rather I understand that you don't understand.
What a nonsensical post.
If you are against sexual assault, you should be against sexual assault regardless of whether the perpetrator is male or female.How does other forms of sexual assault and harassment (outside of Metoo) diminish or inform Metoo?
This is a deeply stupid, nonsensical analogy.Its like running the argument that the IRA's existence somehow make ISIS less of a threat.
If you are against sexual assault, you should be against sexual assault regardless of whether the perpetrator is male or female.
How is it a strawman? I haven't misrepresented anyone's argument.What a mammoth strawman.
I should hope they're not. That's why I hope they are equally prepared to condemn sexual assault/harrassment perpetrated by women. Which part of that do you find objectionable?Who from Metoo is not against (i.e. OK with) other forms of sexual assault?
How is it a strawman? I haven't misrepresented anyone's argument.
I hope they are equally prepared to condemn sexual assault perpetrated by women.
It really isn't.Its the literal definition of a Strawman.
Where did I suggest they would approve of it?The Metoo movement is focused on abuse of the patriarchy by men to perpetuate sexually predatory behavior. That doesnt lead to the corollary that Metoo must therefore somehow approve of other forms of sexual coercion, abuse and violence.
This is an actual strawman.Using your logic, an entity dedicated to opposing child sex abuse in the Catholic church somehow must approve of other forms of child sex abuse in other organizations or contexts.
So presumably they would also condemn sexual assault/harrassment when perpetrated by women?Why would they? That's not their focus, and it has literally nothing to do with Metoo (which has its focus on the abuse of patriarchal power by men to facilitate sexual abuse).
Another ludicrous analogy/strawman.It's like saying White Ribbon (a group that exists to prevent Mens violence against Women) supports terrorists because they dont comment on other forms of violence (like terrorism).
I don't think you understand that term.It's a strawman argument of the highest order.
Excuse me?Lol. Give it up .You sound like a women hater. Your mum is a women don't forget .
You may actually be the person, overall, getting the most out of it.