Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You'd probably need pick 2 to get Callaghan though. Doubt even 7 and 15 gets 2.
Oh it was a shocking trade and made even worse by the fact they could have taken the second best kid AND got Daicos, as North won't bid at 1, Horne is the best player in the draft and they will call his name out.
its more if Richmond really wanted Callaghan and there was a strong feeling that GWS are taking Mac Andrew with pick 2 and GC taking Gibcus to bookend with B King as top end key position players. Callaghan may still be on the board at the crows pick. FWIW, there has been talk GWS are really looking hard at Mac Andrew - he could be anything but will be a bit of a slow burn due to his body frame being so light. It would make absolute sense for GC to be looking at the best key defender in the draft as they have drafted quite a few mids but lack that extra high end key position player to work with Collins in Defence. But do the clubs see it like that, god only knowsGibcus is surely one at least, but really it's those 4-5. up the pointy end then it evens out for 20 or so picks. It's why trading into the top 5 will cost a mint!
Not much. we got a couple of guys we really rate late.What did Collingwood get for giving away pick2?
North should bid at one. It looks dumb to not
its more if Richmond really wanted Callaghan and there was a strong feeling that GWS are taking Mac Andrew with pick 2 and GC taking Gibcus to bookend with B King as top end key position players. Callaghan may still be on the board at the crows pick. FWIW, there has been talk GWS are really looking hard at Mac Andrew - he could be anything but will be a bit of a slow burn due to his body frame being so light. It would make absolute sense for GC to be looking at the best key defender in the draft as they have drafted quite a few mids but lack that extra high end key position player to work with Collins in Defence. But do the clubs see it like that, god only knows
What did Collingwood get for giving away pick2?
North should bid at one. It looks dumb to not
Not much. we got a couple of guys we really rate late.
but our 3 best draftees - Henry, Macrae, McInnis were recruited before hand. We didn’t need to trade our future first.
They won't though for a number of reasons and the main one being marketing and for a smaller club it's important.
Yes - it will come down to how much they want a player that they think gone at pick 7 v going for another player and then retaining a pick between 15-20. The good news is we have another 4 weeks + to wait to find outThis might be a good result for the tigers if they keep #7
Leaves a better rated next tier mid on the table
its more if Richmond really wanted Callaghan and there was a strong feeling that GWS are taking Mac Andrew with pick 2 and GC taking Gibcus to bookend with B King as top end key position players. Callaghan may still be on the board at the crows pick. FWIW, there has been talk GWS are really looking hard at Mac Andrew - he could be anything but will be a bit of a slow burn due to his body frame being so light. It would make absolute sense for GC to be looking at the best key defender in the draft as they have drafted quite a few mids but lack that extra high end key position player to work with Collins in Defence. But do the clubs see it like that, god only knows
Ah yes hard to market non pick ones like Judd dusty and franklin.
For north to not bid would be very stupid and the pies will likely flog them in a big future final as karma
I would bid on Daicos but reality is North won't as they are set on Horne, it's fine GWS will bid at 2 anyway. Either way Pies are paying a premium.
Still think you shouldn't try and play funny buggers at the pointy end, take the best available talent.
Pick 24 and 30 for pick 2?I looked it up cause I didn't understand your answer.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...-r4-to-collingwood-for-2021-r1.1252475/page-2 holy sh*t
Agree. What will be a factor would be in any thought of a trade down should one present is a guy like Goater whom I suspect the crows have a real interest in - he may very well still be there at 7 so could you trade down - still get the guy you rate the best available after JHF and garner the extra teens pick maybe?Still think you shouldn't try and play funny buggers at the pointy end, take the best available talent.
I think GWS will bid on Darcy rather than Daicos. They would rather a young ruckman before another midfielder.I would bid on Daicos but reality is North won't as they are set on Horne, it's fine GWS will bid at 2 anyway. Either way Pies are paying a premium.
I think GWS will bid on Darcy rather than Daicos. They would rather a young ruckman before another midfielder.
I think GWS will bid on Darcy rather than Daicos. They would rather a young ruckman before another midfielder.
There is a less than zero chance they won't match because if they don't they will be waiting till pick 30 something which will be their first live pick. It is a risk free bid for north as Collingwood are not passing up a guy rated either 1 or 2 in the draft pool for a series of junk picksThey will get Horne anyway.
What's the odds Collingwood don't match?
I know it won't happen but it highlights north are dills imho.
Not sure how why it is to help a fellow rebuilding team. Directly helping a future rival
Agree. What will be a factor would be in any thought of a trade down should one present is a guy like Goater whom I suspect the crows have a real interest in - he may very well still be there at 7 so could you trade down - still get the guy you rate the best available after JHF and garner the extra teens pick maybe?
Yeah we’ve been through this at least 6000 times lolI looked it up cause I didn't understand your answer.
GWS trade pick
#24,
#30
and 2021 R4
to Collingwood for 2021 R1
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...-r4-to-collingwood-for-2021-r1.1252475/page-2
holy sh*t
Not happening, not close either13 for 27, 28 and a future 5th
Still 38 and 40 was sufficient for 27. Trading a future 3rd really tips the scales collingwoods way. If by trade up you mean 26-28 into teens picks possibly..but i cant see anyone earlier than pick 7 doing a trade up with them.
It doesn’t tho. That’s just wishful thinking trying to justify this trade.draft drops off a cliff after pick 30
Little to no exposed form the reason