- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,829
- 56,807
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #2
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They (the family) will be getting Victims of Crime Support now and through that they can claim compensation.It’s the psychological damage to parents and community and Cleo. That’s the thing. I know you can sue for that can’t you? For scaring the sh*te outta everyone.
Im assuming the max is 25yrs? , he may plead guilty.. which gives him a discount..I predict that he’ll be given the maximum penalty that the judge can give him for the crimes he’s found guilty for.
It’s been stated the family didn’t know him.. she would have been asleep, easy to move a young child while sleepingAgree why didn't she make a noise. I think she knew him
I predict that he’ll be given the maximum penalty that the judge can give him for the crimes he’s found guilty for.
I think it's on Netflix, but I got it elsewhere. VPNdid you stream it? from where?
thanks its not on Netflix anymoreI think it's on Netflix, but I got it elsewhere. VPN
Im assuming the max is 25yrs? , he may plead guilty.. which gives him a discount..
Im think 15-20 yrs.
She was likely asleep and didn't wake.Agree why didn't she make a noise. I think she knew him
Hence why I said 15-20..
Nah we all noticed. It's very annoying that people are still getting her name wrongYes my bad, not sure what I was thinking.
You’ve been the only one to pick up on it.
She was likely asleep and didn't wake.
Glad you’ve got nothing else in life to worry about.Nah we all noticed. It's very annoying that people are still getting her name wrong
Yep spot on. They had a time limit to charge him with something, or they would have to release him. Further charges later for sure.All they needed for now was one charge that was strong enough to have him thrown in gaol without bail, there will be an array of additional charges by the time he gets to court in my view.
I reckon Kelly knew Cleo. Or she was talking to someone right throughout the 18 days that she knew. Who were these people with Kelly in the car when he was arrested?
Hence why I said 15-20..
All other charges will be served concurrently… he ain’t getting 30+ yrs unfortunately.. you get less for murderProbably 15-20 just for the kidnapping charge alone, then it will extend with each other charge he gets found guilty of. I can see many more charges being laid....especially driving unlicensed again
I'm surprised they printed that townspeople called the street Toxic Crescent haha.https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www...narvon-home-of-alleged-abductor-c-4457784.amp 2 months seems like an extreme amount of time but who knows what the police know?
Whatever motive he gives will probably suggest that he could offend again.That's what most would be hoping for - but, while not a good comparison, given the bizarre nature of this case, when a child is abducted for ransom motives and providing they are not physically harmed in anyway, the perpetrator/s can often receive sentences of as little as 5 years jail...
Again, while not a good comparison, if you swap 'ransom' for 'obsession', that could at least be a starting point with sentencing - but actual motive is not going to be easy to determine here, given the perpetrator clearly has a few Roos loose in the top paddock...
The press found his facebook posts the night Cleo was abducted. Some of us knew they were there but weren't absolutely sure at the time if it was the correct account.
The man accused of kidnapping Cleo Smith .. wrote about needing privacy and adults being 'careful online too' the day she disappeared.
Terence Darrell Kelly has been charged with two offences including forcibly taking a child under 16 after four-year-old Cleo was taken from her tent at the Blowholes campsite, in WA, in the early hours of October 16.
Kelly's Facebook profile showed that hours before Cleo's mother discovered her missing, he posted about his need for privacy.
'I can't accept friend requests from strangers... I live a private life and I respect those who are on my friend list to ensure their privacy is respected too,' his Facebook status read.
'Us adults have to be careful online too.'
The post explained he would not become 'mates' with people just because they know his family or other friends.
It's understood the post was made about 5am.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...pDia-vSi50O_ltUoL3VX7IVe7yUarAWT9Hco0XAKjIlAk
every town has one I’m sure lolI'm surprised they printed that townspeople called the street Toxic Crescent haha.
Here's some of the most interesting bits in this long article.It looks interesting.
Dangerous descent into make-believe
This leads me to believe that he regularly does get messages through Facebook messenger. It also seems he is talking to a network when he states “is adults have to be careful online too”. I wonder if he is warning his fellow likeminded online friends. The police will have found out who had sent him friend requests. He s paranoid at this point too (seeing as he has Cleo in his possession at this time) and is showing frustration and warning off time wasters. He is being quite direct with his instructions on how to contact him.Here's my screenshot of the post I screenshot on 3 Nov 2021 around 9pm.
I recall that I screenshot it direct from going to his Terence TezKelz Facebook account, as opposed to getting it 2nd hand from somewhere.
The time on the post is 9:07am Sydney AEST which would be 6:07am WST Carnarvon time (not 5am)
View attachment 1275401