Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

[DaTBird187]

She should have just squirted it onto their shirt if that's what they wanted.

Wait...are we still talking vaccines here or did I miss a whole conversation.

 

[G3TWOTYAD3S3RV]

Good news for most of us but surely antivaxers will refuse the experimental drug ?

NO DEAL X


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[G3TWOTYAD3S3RV]

She was serving the antivaxers

Yes you drug addict.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Del165198]

NO DEAL X


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

How long before you get sacked from your job pushing trolleys around the woolies carpark for not getting a jab?

 

[Contested Marx]

How long before you get sacked from your job pushing trolleys around the woolies carpark for not getting a jab?

NO DEAL X

 

[Janus]

This new drug is a protease inhibitor. Protease inhibitors are commonly used to treat HIV (as well as Hepatitis C), which is why in the study they had the patients take it with Ritonavir - which is taken with HIV protease treatments.

If you remember way back when COVID was first analysed, some scientists claimed that it showed a remarkable similarity to HIV. At the time, this was dismissed as a 'conspiracy theory'.

 

[Del165198]

NO DEAL X

DEAL OR?
Xx

 

[G3TWOTYAD3S3RV]

NO DEAL X

NO DEAL X


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[dav3]

How long before you get sacked from your job pushing trolleys around the woolies carpark for not getting a jab?

You're assuming he can actually hold down a job, they should make people get jabbed or lose their centrelink payments

 

[JimmyBC]

You're assuming he can actually hold down a job, they should make people get jabbed or lose their centrelink payments

God you sound like the reincarnation of Bob Francis.

 

[Contested Marx]

NO DEAL X


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

NO DEAL X

 

[FishingRick04]

Should she?

Well If she wanted to get away with fraud, the worst scenario is trying to throw out full syringes, seems like a pretty stupid plan.

 

[Portology]

What is unbelievable is that she did it in front of the supervising doctor. Those of us who have had the jabs at a GP clinic will know there are two health professionals present. The nurse administers the jab while the supervising doctor records the jab. In this case the doctor reported her, how did she expect to get away with it?

Not in NSW for myself and my partner.

Same doc jabbing and recording and they made an error recording the second jab that I only spotted when later when hunting for our digital vacc certificates.

 

[Portology]

Same but I was going to say Playford...


Is the implication they were doing it to someone that was actually expecting to get the vaccine? Or were they just doing what the patient wanted?

Only the nurse has been charged with fraud, so it's reasonable at this stage to assume the patient was expecting to get a real jab.

 

[StrappingTape]

My God just go away Trumper.

It's cute you pretend to be American and have zero grasp of their internal politics but really really want to be part of it. Meanwhile the rest of us can see the worst pandemic policy response in history by a geriatric.

 

[Portology]

It's cute you pretend to be American and have zero grasp of their internal politics but really really want to be part of it. Meanwhile the rest of us can see the worst pandemic policy response in history by a geriatric.

yeah I don't like the guy but Bolsonaro is not really geriatric.

 

[wallumi]

Good news for most of us but surely antivaxers will refuse the experimental drug ?

People seeking optimal health care responses to the Covid19 condition (a category you've been induced to aggressively dismiss as 'anti-vaxers') have been advocating a range of early intervention treatments all along whilst being systematically vilified and marginalised by mainstream authorities for doing so. A recent meta-study of all relevant papers available to date has validated the positive capacity of many of these allegedly 'fake' treatments:

COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 889 studies

COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 889 studies

c19early.com

Suddenly now a miracle early treatment drug is available and endorsed by the orthodox authorities. It is patented, corporate branded and enormously expensive. No correlation involved there at all?

 

[wallumi]

A significant question raised by the situation described above is whether tax-payers would prefer to support early intervention treatments at $1/dose (Ivermectin) or X00's/dose (the Pfizer miracle pill)?

Do you want to pay more tax or reduce other medical services to cover the difference? Such significant public policy issues are buried out of sight by the current totalitarian fear and narrative control campaign. Again, mere correlation?

 

[Del165198]

A significant question raised by the situation described above is whether tax-payers would prefer to support early intervention treatments at $1/dose (Ivermectin) or X00's/dose (the Pfizer miracle pill)?

Do you want to pay more tax or reduce other medical services to cover the difference? Such significant public policy issues are buried out of sight by the current totalitarian fear and narrative control campaign. Again, mere correlation?

A more significant question is whether it's a good idea, when you have no medical qualifications, to do your own research instead of listening to medical experts? The answer is no.

I clicked a few random studies and most of them came up with no result, e.g. not statistically significant that the treatment was effective.

According to this website, you can pretty much treat covid symptoms with anything and it'll work pretty good. Vitamin C, vitamin D, probiotics, horse paste, bleach (probably). People read this shit and go I dont need to take a vaccine, if I get covid I'll just take a couple of aspirin, a vitamin D pill and shoot up some ivermectin and be right.

To believe this shit you have to believe that governments around the world are actively surpressing these "highly effective" treatments in some sort of global vaccine conspiracy.

These treatments are LESS EFFECTIVE, and less tested than vaccines which are already out. Yet people are going to forego getting a vaccine because they did their own research, despite having a room temperature IQ, and heard on the interwebs that Joe Rogan said ivermectin is the way to go. It's absolutely ****ing bizarre. Logically you have to be some sort of conspiracy theorist to buy into it. Oh we don't want a vaccine that has been administered to literally billions with no ill effect, instead I want some random combination of drugs that a study in Mexico said was 28% effective at reducing death, but the results haven't been replicated.

When the clinical trials conclusively prove what is an effective treatment, that's what people will get. That's how medicine works.

Also who are these looney posters that pop out of the woodwork in the middle of the night and are never seen before or after, but just are really passionate about horse paste?

 

[davesnothere]

Only the nurse has been charged with fraud, so it's reasonable at this stage to assume the patient was expecting to get a real jab.

Would think investigation may lead to further charges. If there's a text or email that suggests otherwise?

 

[EskimoPAFC]

Only the nurse has been charged with fraud, so it's reasonable at this stage to assume the patient was expecting to get a real jab.

If this is true the nurse should be jailed for medical malpractice.

Awful stuff, and as I've said before, it makes zero sense that this group that claim to want choice then try to take away the choice of others.

 

[Del165198]

The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce does daily searches for new ivermectin studies, but currently recommends ivermectin not be used to treat COVID-19 outside of "randomised trials with appropriate ethical approval"

Support for the drug follows the political divide in the US, while similarly in Australia it is championed by several right-wing politicians

 

[Del165198]

Good news for most of us but surely antivaxers will refuse the experimental drug ?

Depends if Joe Rogan endorses it.

 

[Holden Hillbilly]

The number of people coming forward for their first COVID-19 vaccine in Adelaide’s northern suburbs has not increased despite efforts to boost lagging jab rates, with parts of the region not forecast to hit 80 per cent double dose vaccination until the end of the year.
The latest federal government figures, correct as of Sunday, show the northern suburbs of Playford and Salisbury are at 56 and 63.6 per cent fully vaccinated for over-16s.


That’s compared to a statewide double-dose vaccination average of 70.6 per cent, with 83.8 per cent of South Australians over the age of 16 having received at least one dose of a vaccine.Salisbury is edging closer to the 80 per cent single dose milestone, with 79.5 per cent in the area having come forward for a jab. Playford is around five points behind at 74.3 per cent single dosed.

Yet the percentage of over-16s in Playford to receive a first dose increased by only 3.8 points this week, marginally down on the 4.2 and 4.5 point increases the area recorded in the two weeks before. Similarly, Salisbury only recorded a 3.1 point growth in first dose vaccinations – its lowest-ever recorded weekly increase and well down on its previous average first dose growth of 3.61 points per week.

More positively, the number of fully vaccinated residents in Playford and Salisbury grew by 4.7 percentage points, the largest increase recorded in both areas since the federal government began publishing local government area vaccination data on August 27.

According to updated projections from South Australian data scientist Ben Moretti, Playford is now on track to reach the 80 per cent double-dose milestone on January 2 – five days earlier than his model’s previous projections, but still more than five weeks after the state reopens its borders on November 23.

 

[OneGreatClub]

The number of people coming forward for their first COVID-19 vaccine in Adelaide’s northern suburbs has not increased despite efforts to boost lagging jab rates, with parts of the region not forecast to hit 80 per cent double dose vaccination until the end of the year.
The latest federal government figures, correct as of Sunday, show the northern suburbs of Playford and Salisbury are at 56 and 63.6 per cent fully vaccinated for over-16s.


That’s compared to a statewide double-dose vaccination average of 70.6 per cent, with 83.8 per cent of South Australians over the age of 16 having received at least one dose of a vaccine.Salisbury is edging closer to the 80 per cent single dose milestone, with 79.5 per cent in the area having come forward for a jab. Playford is around five points behind at 74.3 per cent single dosed.

Yet the percentage of over-16s in Playford to receive a first dose increased by only 3.8 points this week, marginally down on the 4.2 and 4.5 point increases the area recorded in the two weeks before. Similarly, Salisbury only recorded a 3.1 point growth in first dose vaccinations – its lowest-ever recorded weekly increase and well down on its previous average first dose growth of 3.61 points per week.

More positively, the number of fully vaccinated residents in Playford and Salisbury grew by 4.7 percentage points, the largest increase recorded in both areas since the federal government began publishing local government area vaccination data on August 27.

According to updated projections from South Australian data scientist Ben Moretti, Playford is now on track to reach the 80 per cent double-dose milestone on January 2 – five days earlier than his model’s previous projections, but still more than five weeks after the state reopens its borders on November 23.

Geez