Yeah, I figured that's what you meant. Both of them sing about equally as much in their falsetto voices I reckon, and while Bellamy can probably get higher and belt it out harder (I'm not sure about his 'real range', I remember hearing something about him having small vocal nodes or something and not being being able to get too low, although I might be completely off the mark there), I think Yorke gets a much better texture and timbre to his voice with much more interesting melodies. Anyway I can think we should be able to at least agree that Jeff Buckley wipes the floor with both of them
Respect all you've said there, but I put Bellamy slightly ahead in all the ways you put Yorke ahead. And yeah I read something about bellamy's small or tight vocal chords too, allowing him to get high. Though most people can get that high IMO, just a matter if they can control the strength and timbre to the point that it's pleasurable and compliments the song.
With the Jeff Buckley thing, he unfortunately didn't get to do enough to fairly compare him against the Giants of Matt Bellamy and Thom Yorke. Along with John Lennon, I feel buckley's death was the biggest theft for music fans... of what they still might've done.
The idea of a collaboration between the three, while impossible, would be something to have behold.