Rookie and then upgrade if his body is improved by our fitness staff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We retire Russ's#7 and give #8 to the guy who has that now.8, 11, 27, 31, 35 (unlikely) 36, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 46, 47, 49, 50
Do we retire Hamish's 8 for a time like we have with Westy's 39? Next year will be 10 years since JMac died, so 35 probably won't be used. 31 was Finlayson's number at GWS, so that's available if he wants it. Sam Skinner won't be getting his previous 21. I'd hope Meady gets something more befitting PAFC royalty than 44, but he's probably more determined just to stay on the park and push for a senior game.
You mean Duursma?We retire Russ's#7 and give #8 to the guy who has that now.
Russell wouldn't have a bar of his number being retired imo
I feel like he is destined to be our Magpies captain.Dumont is an honest trier but a crab, what a waste of a spot.
I Disagree better Dumont who is a half decent AFL player then pick 87.Dumont is an honest trier but a crab, what a waste of a spot.
My thought is that we know that Dumont is an average player yet pick 87 (or whatever) is an unknown quantity and could be our next Karl Amon if we give him a go.I Disagree better Dumont who is a half decent AFL player then pick 87.
True. We have some great late picks over the years.. but still low % and Dumont is a well he is Dumont we know what we will get.... the correct decision? Time will tell...My thought is that we know that Dumont is an average player yet pick 87 (or whatever) is an unknown quantity and could be our next Karl Amon if we give him a go.
Speaking of clubs that should fold.Greatest fact about Kilburn (apart from me being raised there to age 5)-
Originally called Chicago, Kilburn had its name changed from Chicago in the 1930s because it was emulating the gang culture of its American namesake. And they chose Kill-Burn!!
PS that is why the nickname of the Kilburn footy and cricket clubs is the “Chics.”
That being the case why has the worst team in the competition delisted him?Frog is a good pick up for you. He's certainly AFL quality and a very handy second string option.
That being the case why has the worst team in the competition delisted him?
Nah, you and I both know that if he was any good he'd be there to help foster the kids thru, the fact is he's just a C grade footballer with absolutely nil weapons in his tool box other than being a trier.Because we've drafted a whole heap of kids high in the draft that play his role.
He's not going to play in our next flag, but could very well play in yours.
Nah, you and I both know that if he was any good he'd be there to help foster the kids thru, the fact is he's just a C grade footballer with absolutely nil weapons in his tool box other than being a trier.
Don't bother arguing with that bloke, you're wasting your time.You can only have so many to do that and we have Ziebell, Cunners and Anderson to do that for the mids. Simpkin taking a leadership role too.
If you'd picked up Atley I'd be a bit wtf, but Frog's a very solid performer.
What a superficial and dumb argument.That being the case why has the worst team in the competition delisted him?
Stop your crying for once in your life and just explain to me what Dumont's weapons are, just cos your a fan boi doesn't mean that everyone else has to be.Don't bother arguing with that bloke, you're wasting your time.
Lyons was a stupid move by a stupid club and Mckenzie has a definate weapon in his leg - what does Dumont have?What a superficial and dumb argument.
Jarryd Lyons and Trent McKenzie seem to be going alright